Capturing teacher students’ emotional experiences in context: does inquiry-based learning make a difference?

In the present study teacher students’ contextual learning experiences were examined longitudinally in authentic study environments using the contextual activity sampling system, a means of mobile-supported experience sampling. The students’ (n = 9) experiences were first recorded during a 2 week period in their first year of study. The same measurements were repeated again for a 2 week follow-up in the second year, accompanied by interviews before and after the follow-up. The first year of study consisted mostly of lectures and ordinary small-group work, whereas the second measurement period ran parallel to the completion of an intensive inquiry-based project, which was the focus of the present study. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed that studying during the inquiry-based period produced stronger experiences of being challenged as well as negative affects than the teacher-centered period. The participants’ experiences of competence, commitment and positive affects did not differ during the two periods. However, interview data indicated that the participants enjoyed the inquiry-based period and that the work was intensive. Contextual data and interviews were also used to describe students’ experiences during one particular study session during the inquiry-based project. The results suggest that negative affects may be an essential part of the process of gradually learning to take responsibility for both individual and collaborative learning processes. Possibilities for using experience-sampling methods to analyze collaborative learning are also discussed.

[1]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. , 2000 .

[2]  V. Lee,et al.  Teaching and learning through inquiry : a guidebook for institutions and instructors , 2004 .

[3]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  What makes lessons interesting?: The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects , 2008 .

[4]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  The Interrogative Model of Inquiry and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2002 .

[6]  Mien Segers,et al.  Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning , 2008 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. , 1988 .

[8]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[9]  David Kember,et al.  Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive , 2006 .

[10]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Students’ approaches to learning and assessment preferences in a portfolio-based learning environment , 2008 .

[11]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[12]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[13]  Peter Op 't Eynde,et al.  Focusing on the Complexity of Emotion Issues in Academic Learning: A Dynamical Component Systems Approach , 2006 .

[14]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  B. Mesquita,et al.  The experience of emotion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Rebecca Walker,et al.  Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? , 2010 .

[17]  Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al.  Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: introducing a multi-directional approach , 2008 .

[18]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[19]  K. Lonka,et al.  Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education , 1995 .

[20]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[21]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Individual Ways of Interacting with the Learning Environment--Are They Related to Study Success?. , 1998 .

[22]  J. Overall,et al.  Concerning least squares analysis of experimental data. , 1969 .

[23]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Progress and open problems in educational emotion research , 2005 .

[24]  R. Pekrun.  The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice , 2006 .

[25]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Students' Accounts of Their Participation in an Intensive Long-Term Learning Community. , 2005 .

[27]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Congruence and friction between learning and teaching , 1999 .

[28]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[29]  K. Lonka,et al.  Interaction between Learning Environment and Expert Learning. , 2000 .

[30]  A. Renkl.  Why constructivists should not talk about constructivist learning environments: a commentary on Loyens and Gijbels (2008) , 2009 .

[31]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions , 2000 .

[32]  Joel M. Hektner,et al.  Experience sampling method , 2007 .

[33]  H. Reis,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[34]  Lasse Lipponen,et al.  Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education. , 2011 .

[35]  Hanni Muukkonen,et al.  Technology-Mediation and Tutoring: How Do They Shape Progressive Inquiry Discourse? , 2005 .

[36]  Mikko Inkinen,et al.  CASS-methods and tools for investigating higher education knowledge practices , 2008, ICLS.

[37]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Models of Concentration in Natural Environments: A Comparative Approach Based on Streams of Experiential Data , 1999 .

[38]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving Beyond the Cognitive–Situative Divide and Combining Individual and Social Processes , 2010 .

[39]  James J.F. Forest,et al.  University Teaching , 2001 .

[40]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment , 2006 .

[41]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  Progressive inquiry learning for children — Experiences, possibilities, limitations , 2000 .

[42]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative phenomenological analysis. , 2008, Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.)..

[43]  Eija Kimonen.  Curriculum Approaches: Readings and Activities for Educational Studies. , 2001 .

[44]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.