Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

OBJECTIVES Because musculoskeletal pain is the second most frequent reason for seeking health care, the aims of this study were to determine the value of psychosocial variables in evaluating risk for developing chronic back pain problems and to develop a screening methodology to identify patients likely to have a poor prognosis. STUDY DESIGN A prospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with acute or subacute back pain, in which patients completed a screening questionnaire and were then followed up for 6 months to determine outcome. The primary outcome variable was accumulated sick leave. METHODS One hundred forty-two consecutive patients were asked to complete a questionnaire designed for this study. This questionnaire contained 24 items concerning psychosocial aspects of the problem. Six months later, patients were contacted to complete outcome questions about accumulated sick leave. RESULTS A total of 97% of the patients completed both questionnaires. Although patients, on average, improved greatly, 18% had 1-30 days and 20% had fewer than 30 days of sick leave during the follow-up period. Five variables were found to be the strongest predictors of sick leave outcome (fear-avoidance work beliefs, perceived improvement, problems with work function, stress, and previous sick leave), correctly classifying 73% of the patients as opposed to a chance rate of 33%. A total score was evaluated as a means of judging risk and found to be strongly related to outcome. CONCLUSION Potent psychosocial risk factors associated with future sick absenteeism were identified. Because the total score was related to outcome, the instrument may have use in screening patients with acute or subacute spinal pain in clinical situations.

[1]  S. Linton Activities of Daily Living Scale for Patients with Chronic Pain , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  L. Haugh,et al.  Early Prediction of Chronic Disability After Occupational Low Back Injury , 1996, Spine.

[3]  W. Fordyce,et al.  A Prospective Study of Work Perceptions and Psychosocial Factors Affecting the Report of Back Injury , 1991, Spine.

[4]  S. Linton,et al.  The Reliability of Self-reported Sick Absenteeism: A Pilot Study , 1995 .

[5]  M. Skovron,et al.  Epidemiology of low back pain. , 1992, Bailliere's clinical rheumatology.

[6]  A. Burton,et al.  Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble , 1995, Spine.

[7]  L. Warg,et al.  Attributions (Beliefs) and Job Satisfaction Associated with Back Pain in an Industrial Setting , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[8]  G. Waddell,et al.  A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability , 1993, Pain.

[9]  S. Linton,et al.  The Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: Description and Initial Findings , 1992 .

[10]  S. Linton,et al.  Working despite pain: Factors associated with work attendance versus dysfunction , 1995, International journal of behavioral medicine.

[11]  S. Linton,et al.  Coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ): Reliability of the swedish version of the CSQ , 1993 .

[12]  Francis J. Keefe,et al.  The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment , 1983, Pain.

[13]  S. Hollis,et al.  The Distress and Risk Assessment Method: A Simple Patient Classification to Identify Distress and Evaluate the Risk of Poor Outcome , 1992, Spine.

[14]  R. Gatchel,et al.  Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  Predicting disability from low back pain. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.