Multicriteria cost-benefit assessment of tannery production: The need for breakthrough process alternatives beyond conventional technology optimization

Abstract The worldwide use of chromium-based processes in tanneries generates increased concerns about their related environmental burdens. Cleaner production alternatives for leather production are being proposed, based on the optimization of specific aspects or criteria, for instance, reducing demand for specific materials and energy, or reducing local toxicological emissions. While improvement on individual characteristics of the process is certainly to be favored, a more comprehensive evaluation of alternatives is also needed to prevent the risk of shifting the burden to increase global load while addressing one specific critical factor of production. This work aims to discuss the importance of a multicriteria, multiscale approach to address cleaner production strategy costs and benefits. For this, materials balance, an economic approach, and emergy (with an “m”) accounting methods are applied to selected unhairing/liming, pickling/tanning and wastewater treatment steps in a tannery process, which was chosen as a case study. Results show that the assessed recycling cleaner production strategies assessed allow the manufacturer to reduce by one half the amount of water used and the demand for chemicals up to 4% with respect to the business-as-usual process, at the expense of increasing electricity demand by 10%. Economic cost-to-benefit ratio was 25$ benefits per 1$ invested, as well as an emergy-based cost-to-benefit of 33Em$ per 1Em$ invested, of course these improvements were limited to the three investigated process steps. The improvement in cost/benefit ratios indicates that converting scenario #0 into #1 is favorable under economic and emergy views. However, when the two scenarios are investigated from the point of view of the imbalance in local and renewable resource use versus imported and nonrenewable use, the emergy method shows a small overall increase in renewability (from 3.51% to 3.85%), a low, but expected, emergy yield ratio equal to 1, and a high environmental loading ratio (24.95 and 27.47). While the environmental cost–benefit ratio shows that recycling is a favorable option, the emergy performance indicators highlight that the efficiency of recycling is still insufficient and improvements in the tanning processes are needed to ensure renewability and sustainability. A number of process chemicals were involved in the investigated tannery operations, which required emergy evaluations. As a side result of this study, the Unit Emergy Values (UEVs) of SO2, H2SO4 Na2SO4, HCL, Na2S, NaOH, CaO, Ca(OH)2, Cr2O3, MnSO4, and Al(OH)3, were also calculated thus adding to the emergy database about chemicals.

[1]  Feni Agostinho,et al.  Support area as an indicator of environmental load: Comparison between Embodied Energy, Ecological Footprint, and Emergy Accounting methods , 2013 .

[2]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[3]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Integrated food, energy and environmental services production as an alternative for small rural properties in Brazil , 2012 .

[4]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: A review and refinement of the emergy baseline , 2010 .

[5]  S. Asia CHROME MANAGEMENT IN THE TANYARD , 2000 .

[6]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[7]  N. K. Chandra Babu,et al.  Recovery and reuse of chromium from chrome tanning waste water aiming towards zero discharge of pollution , 2008 .

[8]  A. A. Jensen Life cycle assessment (LCA) : a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources , 1998 .

[9]  Xin-shi Zhang,et al.  Environmental and economic consequences of the overexploitation of natural capital and ecosystem services in Xilinguole League, China , 2014 .

[10]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Use of Life Cycle assessment in the procedure for the establishment of environmental criteria in the catalan ECO-label of leather , 2002 .

[11]  Mariliz Gutterres,et al.  Environmentally friendly hide unhairing: enzymatic hide processing for the replacement of sodium sulfide and delimig , 2013 .

[12]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting , 2006 .

[13]  H. Chum,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering , 2010 .

[14]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method , 2005 .

[15]  Kurian Joseph,et al.  Material flows in the life cycle of leather , 2009 .

[16]  Mingxi Wang,et al.  Ecological utilization of leather tannery waste with circular economy model , 2011 .

[17]  Julika Zimmermann,et al.  Reducing the environmental impact , 2013, ADHESION ADHESIVES&SEALANTS.

[18]  C. Muralidharan,et al.  Cleaner chrome tanning — emerging options , 2002 .

[19]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[20]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[21]  K. Mori,et al.  Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) , 2012 .

[22]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Assessment of a large watershed in Brazil using Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System , 2010 .

[23]  Rita Puig,et al.  Environmental optimization of chromium recovery from tannery sludge using a life cycle assessment approach. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  Z. Shan,et al.  Cleaner beam house processes trial on cattle sofa leather , 2010 .

[25]  F. Cherubini,et al.  Environmental driving forces of urban growth and development: An emergy-based assessment of the city of Rome, Italy , 2009 .

[26]  B Rivela,et al.  Life cycle assessment as a tool for the environmental improvement of the tannery industry in developing countries. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil , 2008 .

[28]  A. Buenfil,et al.  EMERGY EVALUATION OF WATER , 2001 .

[29]  Luigi Campanella,et al.  Emergy-based complexity measures in natural and social systems , 2011 .

[30]  Amalia Zucaro,et al.  Material, energy and environmental performance of technological and social systems under a Life Cycle Assessment perspective , 2011 .

[31]  R. B. Chavan,et al.  Environmentally friendly dyes , 2011 .

[32]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Labor and Services as Information Carriers in Emergy-LCA Accounting , 2014 .

[33]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Less bad is not good enough: approaching zero emissions techniques and systems , 2007 .

[34]  Maarten A. Siebel,et al.  Reducing the environmental impact of the unhairing–liming process in the leather tanning industry , 2006 .

[35]  Feni Agostinho,et al.  Hidden costs of a typical embodied energy analysis: Brazilian sugarcane ethanol as a case study. , 2014 .

[36]  Palanisamy Thanikaivelan,et al.  Approach towards zero discharge tanning: role of concentration on the development of eco-friendly liming–reliming processes , 2003 .

[37]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems , 2002 .

[38]  Amalia Zucaro,et al.  Urban resource use and environmental performance indicators. An application of decomposition analysis , 2014 .

[39]  Thomas Abel,et al.  Emergy evaluation of DNA and culture in ‘information cycles’ , 2013 .

[40]  Renner Manfred,et al.  Free of water tanning using CO2 as process additive—An overview on the process development , 2012 .

[41]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergy assessment of a coffee farm in Brazilian Cerrado considering in a broad form the environmental services, negative externalities and fair price , 2011 .

[42]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Improved emergy indices for the evaluation of industrial systems incorporating waste management , 2011 .

[43]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Primary evidences on the robustness of environmental accounting from emergy , 2013 .

[44]  Balachandran Unni Nair,et al.  Recouping the wastewater: a way forward for cleaner leather processing , 2003 .

[45]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergy diagnosis and reflections towards Brazilian sustainable development , 2013 .

[46]  Jun Wu,et al.  Emergy evaluation of the impact of waste exchanges on the sustainability of industrial systems , 2011 .

[47]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Cleaner production practices in a medium size gold-plated jewelry company in Brazil: when little changes make the difference , 2008 .

[48]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergetic ternary diagrams: five examples for application in environmental accounting for decision-making , 2007 .

[49]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions The case of electricity production , 2002 .

[50]  Valeria Monno,et al.  Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings , 2012 .

[51]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Overcoming the inadequacy of single-criterion approaches to Life Cycle Assessment , 2006 .

[52]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a giant bamboo plantation in Brazil: exploring the influence of labour, time and space , 2010 .

[53]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas , 2011 .