Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems

Sustainable transportation systems are the need of modern times. There has been an unexpected growth in the number of transportation activities over years and the trend is expected to continue in the coming years. This has obviously associated environmental costs like air pollution, noise, etc. which is degrading the quality of life in modern cities. To cope us this crisis, municipal administrations are investing in sustainable transportation systems that are not only efficient, robust and economical but also friendly towards environment. The challenge before the transportation decision makers is how to evaluate and select such sustainable transportation systems. In this paper, we present a multicriteria decision making approach for selecting sustainability transportation systems under partial or incomplete information (uncertainty). The proposed approach comprises of three steps. In step 1, we identify the criteria for sustainability assessment of transportation. In step 2, experts provide linguistic ratings to the potential alternatives against the selected criteria. Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to generate aggregate scores for sustainability assessment and selection of best alternative. In step 3, sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the influence of criteria weights on the decision making process. A numerical illustration is provided to demonstrate the applicability of the approach. The strength of the proposed work is its practical applicability and the ability to generate good quality solutions under uncertainty.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Özgür Kabak,et al.  A problem-structuring model for analyzing transportation-environment relationships , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  R. Daniel Jonsson,et al.  Analysing sustainability in a land-use and transport system , 2008 .

[4]  M. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating Urban Sustainability Using Land-Use Transport Interaction Models , 2004 .

[5]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multicriteria analysis , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[6]  Caroline M. Eastman,et al.  Review: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications : Arnold Kaufmann and Madan M. Gupta, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985 , 1987, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[7]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  A tool for evaluating urban sustainability via integrated transportation and land use simulation models , 2009 .

[9]  W. Pedrycz.  Why triangular membership functions , 1994 .

[10]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[11]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative transport policy scenarios in an Irish city-region , 2008 .

[12]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Classification Using Belief Functions: Relationship Between Case-Based and Model-Based Approaches , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[13]  Becky P.Y. Loo.  Role of stated preference methods in planning for sustainable urban transportation: state of practice and future prospects , 2002 .

[14]  R. Buliung,et al.  Estimating the Contribution of Commercial Vehicle Movement to Mobile Emissions in Urban Areas , 2008 .

[15]  Marcus Henricus Petrus Zuidgeest,et al.  Sustainable urban transport development: a dynamic optimisation approach , 2005 .

[16]  Euro Beinat,et al.  Multi‐criteria analysis for environmental management , 2001 .

[17]  Ram M. Shrestha,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH FOR THE SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN DELHI , 2003 .

[18]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  The application of knowledge management to support the sustainable analysis of urban transportation infrastructure , 2005 .

[19]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions , 2009 .

[20]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[21]  K M Gwilliam,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: PRIORITIES FOR POLICY REFORM , 1996 .

[22]  R.-S. Lu,et al.  Analysis of reservoir water quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation , 1999 .

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination , 1985, AI Mag..

[24]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review , 1995 .

[25]  Todd Alexander Litman,et al.  Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Research Program For Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data , 2009 .

[26]  Carys Jones,et al.  Policy, Plan, and Programme Environmental Assessment in England, the Netherlands, and Germany: Practice and Prospects , 2002 .

[27]  John Handley,et al.  The Application of Environmental Impact Assessment to Land Reclamation Practice , 2001 .

[28]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  EFECT – evaluation framework of environmental impacts and costs of transport initiatives , 2000 .

[29]  Yang Tao,et al.  FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT, FUZZY CLUSTERING ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATION FOR URBAN TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENT QUALITY EVALUATION , 1998 .

[30]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: LINKAGES BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, PUBLIC TRANSPORT, NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORT AND SAFETY , 2000 .

[31]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms , 1982 .

[32]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[33]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[34]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[35]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Sustainability indicators: the problem of integration , 2001 .

[36]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Linkage-Based Frameworks for Sustainability Assessment: Making a Case for Driving Force-Pressure-State-Exposure-Effect-Action (DPSEEA) Frameworks , 2009 .

[37]  William R. Black,et al.  Sustainable transportation: a US perspective , 1996 .

[38]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Sustainable Urban Transport in the 21st Century: A New Agenda , 2002 .

[39]  J. Buckley.  Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1985 .

[40]  A. Páez,et al.  Sustainable Urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches , 2002 .

[41]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Sustainability Assessment at the Transportation Planning Level: Performance Measures and Indexes , 2008 .

[43]  Gin-Shuh Liang,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Barbara C. Richardson,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS , 2005 .

[45]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Linguistic decision‐making models , 1992, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[46]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multi-criteria task assignment in workflow management systems , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[47]  Norman Lee,et al.  Integrated Impact Assessment for Sustainable Development: A Case Study Approach , 2001 .

[48]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[49]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic , 2001 .