The selection of the key ergonomic indicators influencing work efficiency in railway control rooms

This paper presents an analytical–synthetic model of ergonomic research of the abilities of the dispatcher/operator in the control room for the automatic control of railway transportation. Twenty performance indicators describing the operators’ performance (work capacity and perceptive abilities) and the main characteristics of the control room (work organization and ergo-technical analysis) are identified. A group fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied in the process of ranking and selection of key performance indicators of railway control rooms. The selected key performance indicators (the operator’s hand movement, visual symptoms of fatigue, device error analysis, location and dimensions of the control desk) are analysed in detail.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan Human supervisory control of aircraft, rail and highway vehicles , 1999 .

[2]  Poong-Hyun Seong,et al.  A human-machine interface evaluation method: A difficulty evaluation method in information searching (DEMIS) , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Emilie M. Roth USING OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AS A TOOL FOR DISCOVERY: UNCOVERING COGNITIVE AND COLLABORATIVE DEMANDS AND ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES , .

[4]  Tzai-Zang Lee,et al.  Comparing appropriate decision support of human resource practices on organizational performance with DEA/AHP model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Questioning, exploring, narrating and playing in the control room to maintain system safety , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[9]  Laura Pickup,et al.  Understanding of Mental Workload in the Railways , 2017 .

[10]  S Popkin,et al.  A Preliminary Examination of Railroad Dispatcher Workload, Stress, and Fatigue , 2001 .

[11]  Sunqi,et al.  Study on Fuzzy Evaluation of Train Operation Dispatching System for China Passenger Dedicated Lines Based on AHP , 2011 .

[12]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  How do operators monitor a complex, dynamic work domain? The impact of control room technology , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Minli Dai Innovative Computing and Information , 2011 .

[14]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method - application to railway system , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Dileep Buddaraju Performance of control room operators in alarm management , 2011 .

[17]  John R Wilson,et al.  Rail human factors: Past, present and future. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin,et al.  Effects of VDT workstation lighting conditions on operator visual workload. , 2008, Industrial health.

[19]  Yao Chen,et al.  A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: A railway risk management system , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[20]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of control room human factors: a case study in the railway industry , 1999 .

[21]  Theresa Clarke,et al.  On the Right Track: Systematic Implementation of Ergonomics in Railway Network Control , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[22]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Elise G. C. Crawford,et al.  New control room technologies: human factors analytical tools for railway safety , 2013 .

[24]  René J. Jorna,et al.  Analysis and support of planning in the Dutch railroad company , 2005 .

[25]  M. T. Isaai,et al.  Intelligent timetable evaluation using fuzzy AHP , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey , 2004 .

[27]  Kim J. Vicente *,et al.  Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: a qualitative cognitive model based on field observations , 2004 .

[28]  Salman Nazir,et al.  Performance Indicators for the Assessment of Industrial Operators , 2012 .

[29]  Najmedin Meshkati,et al.  Safety and Human Factors Considerations in Control Rooms of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems: Conceptual Issues and Practical Observations , 2006, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[30]  Hepu Deng Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[31]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[32]  Okan Duru,et al.  Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  X. Li The control room operator : The forgotten element in mineral process control , 2018 .

[34]  A Mills,et al.  Future train traffic control, control by re-planning , 2004 .

[35]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[36]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Practical use of work analysis to support rail electrical control rooms: A case of alarm handling , 2013 .

[37]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[38]  Laura Pickup,et al.  A Conceptual Framework of Mental Workload and the Development of a Self-reporting Integrated Workload Scale for Railway Signallers , 2017 .