Computer-based intrapartum fetal monitoring and beyond

The second Signal Processing and Monitoring in Labor workshop gathered researchers who utilize promising new research strategies and initiatives to tackle the challenges of intrapartum fetal monitoring. The workshop included a series of lectures and discussions focusing on: new algorithms and techniques for cardiotocogoraphy (CTG) and ECG acquisition and analyses; the results of a CTG evaluation challenge comparing state-of-the-art computerized methods and visual interpretation for the detection of arterial cord pH<7.05 at birth; the lack of consensus about the role of intrapartum acidemia in the etiology of fetal brain injury; the differences between methods for CTG analysis ‘mimicking’ expert clinicians and those derived from ‘data-driven’ analyses; a critical review of the results from two randomized controlled trials testing the former in clinical practice; and relevant insights from modern physiologybased studies. We concluded that the automated algorithms performed comparably to each other and to clinical assessment of the CTG. However, the sensitivity and specificity urgently need to be improved (both computerized and visual assessment). Data-driven CTG evaluation requires further work with large multicenter datasets based on well-defined labor outcomes. And before first tests in the clinic, there are important lessons to be learnt from clinical trials that tested automated algorithms mimicking expert CTG interpretation. In addition, transabdominal fetal ECG monitoring provides reliable CTG traces and variability estimates; and fetal ECG waveform analysis is subject to promising new research. There is a clear need for close collaboration between computing and clinical experts. We believe that progress will be possible with multidisciplinary collaborative research.

[1]  R D Keith,et al.  Development, evaluation and validation of an intelligent system for the management of labour. , 1994, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  Sandy Weininger,et al.  Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Rosen,et al.  An approach to the study of brain damage. The principles of fetal electroencephalography. , 1973, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J A Westgate,et al.  Fetal heart rate variability changes during brief repeated umbilical cord occlusion in near term fetal sheep , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  H. Eswaran,et al.  Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in the human fetus during labor. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  Martin G. Frasch,et al.  Can Monitoring Fetal Intestinal Inflammation Using Heart Rate Variability Analysis Signal Incipient Necrotizing Enterocolitis of the Neonate? , 2016, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[7]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  A practical guide to non-invasive foetal electrocardiogram extraction and analysis , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Yoram Louzoun,et al.  Adaptive shut-down of EEG activity predicts critical acidemia in the near-term ovine fetus , 2015, Physiological reports.

[9]  Leah Antoniewicz,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Classification Using Generative Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  K. Lindecrantz,et al.  Fetal heart rate short term variation during labor in relation to scalp blood lactate concentration , 2018, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  B. Schifrin Graded classification of fetal heart rate tracings: association with neonatal metabolic acidosis and neurologic morbidity. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Artificial neural networks applied to fetal monitoring in labour , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[14]  G. Clifford,et al.  Clinically accurate fetal ECG parameters acquired from maternal abdominal sensors. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  A. Gunn,et al.  The fetus at the tipping point: modifying the outcome of fetal asphyxia , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  B. Schifrin,et al.  The CTG and the timing and mechanism of fetal neurological injuries. , 2004, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  R D Keith,et al.  A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Understanding Fetal Heart Rate Patterns That May Predict Antenatal and Intrapartum Neural Injury. , 2018, Seminars in pediatric neurology.

[19]  G. Macones,et al.  Association of Atypical Decelerations With Acidemia , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Anthony O Odibo,et al.  Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Computerized data‐driven interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocogram: a cohort study , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[22]  Rik Vullings,et al.  The electrical heart axis and ST events in fetal monitoring: A post-hoc analysis following a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2017, PloS one.

[23]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[24]  E H Hon,et al.  The classification of fetal heart rate. II. A revised working classification. , 1967, Connecticut medicine.

[25]  R. Keith The INFANT study—a flawed design foreseen , 2017, The Lancet.

[26]  J Randall Moorman The modern age of Physiological Measurement. , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[27]  M. Benders,et al.  Cardiotocography Plus ST Analysis of Fetal Electrocardiogram Compared With Cardiotocography Only for Intrapartum Monitoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  A. Leviton Why the term neonatal encephalopathy should be preferred over neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  A. Ugwumadu,et al.  Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[30]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Umbilical cord gases in relation to the neonatal condition: the EveREst plot. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[31]  R. Sokol,et al.  Fetal electroencephalographic monitoring related to infant outcome. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Dwight J Rouse,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  G. Boylan,et al.  Commentary: Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[34]  S J Payne,et al.  Phase‐rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[35]  J. Gerald Quirk,et al.  Supervised and Unsupervised Learning of Fetal Heart Rate Tracings with Deep Gaussian Processes , 2018, 2018 14th Symposium on Neural Networks and Applications (NEUREL).

[36]  Martin G. Frasch,et al.  Correlating multidimensional fetal heart rate variability analysis with acid-base balance at birth , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[37]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[38]  R. Caldeyro-barcia,et al.  Effects of atropine on the heart rate of the human fetus during labor. , 1963, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  Christopher Mabey,et al.  Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[40]  A. Seely,et al.  Temporal Patterns in Sheep Fetal Heart Rate Variability Correlate to Systemic Cytokine Inflammatory Response: A Methodological Exploration of Monitoring Potential Using Complex Signals Bioinformatics , 2016, PloS one.

[41]  Samuel Smith,et al.  The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[42]  J. Dieleman,et al.  Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter. , 2017, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[43]  M. Ross,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Electrocortical Activity during Labour for Predicting Worsening Acidemia: A Prospective Study in the Ovine Fetus Near Term , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  João Bernardes,et al.  Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  João Bernardes,et al.  SisPorto 4.0 – computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2017, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[46]  R. H. Philpott,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FETAL HEAD COMPRESSION AND FETAL ACIDAEMIA DURING LABOUR ON HUMAN FETAL CEREBRAL FUNCTION AS MEASURED BY THE FETAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM , 1979, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[47]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Scattering Transform for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Fractal Analysis: A Case-Control Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Everett F. Magann,et al.  Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[49]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Deep Learning for Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Labor , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[50]  I. Amer-Wåhlin,et al.  Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: A review. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[51]  Nelly Pustelnik,et al.  Sparse learning for Intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis , 2018 .

[52]  J. Parer,et al.  Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Is there evidence of an association? , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[53]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians , 2010, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[54]  Barrie Hayes-Gill,et al.  Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[55]  Izmail Batkin,et al.  Sampling Rate of Heart Rate Variability Impacts the Ability to Detect Acidemia in Ovine Fetuses Near-Term , 2014, Front. Pediatr..

[56]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[57]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[58]  R. Vullings,et al.  Detection rate of fetal distress using contraction-dependent fetal heart rate variability analysis , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[59]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Sparse Support Vector Machine for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[60]  Alison G. Cahill,et al.  A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[61]  Michael G. Ross,et al.  Online Detection of Fetal Acidemia during Labour by Testing Synchronization of EEG and Heart Rate: A Prospective Study in Fetal Sheep , 2014, PloS one.

[62]  Nadia Badawi,et al.  Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. , 2010, Early human development.

[63]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[64]  J. Westgate,et al.  The myths and physiology surrounding intrapartum decelerations: the critical role of the peripheral chemoreflex , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[65]  Martin G. Frasch,et al.  Does heart rate variability reflect the systemic inflammatory response in a fetal sheep model of lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis? , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[66]  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CHANGES IN THE CONTINUOUS FETAL HEART RATE IN THE FIRST STAGE OF LABOUR , 1971, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[67]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Information Theory to Probe Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Dynamics , 2017, Entropy.

[68]  Martin G. Frasch,et al.  Efficient Fetal-Maternal ECG Signal Separation from Two Channel Maternal Abdominal ECG via Diffusion-Based Channel Selection , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[69]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[70]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[71]  Stephen J Payne,et al.  Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[72]  R. Ball,et al.  The physiologic mechanisms of variable decelerations. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[73]  K. Greene,et al.  Changes in the ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with hypoxemia. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[74]  N. Marlow,et al.  The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study: further analyses to enhance policy and service delivery decision-making for planned place of birth , 2015 .

[75]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[76]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Real-Time Spectral Analysis of the Fetal EEG: A New Approach to Monitoring Sleep States and Fetal Condition during Labor , 2000, Pediatric Research.

[77]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Fractal Analysis and Hurst Parameter for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Analysis: A Versatile Alternative to Frequency Bands and LF/HF Ratio , 2015, PloS one.

[78]  Mark D. Skowronski,et al.  Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[79]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.