Influence and Compensation of Truncation Artifacts in MR-Based Attenuation Correction in PET/MR

The goal of this article is to quantify the influence of truncation artifacts in the magnetic resonance (MR)-based attenuation map (MRMap) on reconstructed positron emission tomography (PET) image volumes and to propose a new method for minimizing this influence. Methods: PET data sets of 20 patients investigated in a Philips Ingenuity PET/MR were reconstructed with and without applying two different methods for truncation compensation (TC1 vendor-provided, TC2 newly developed). In this patient group, the extent of truncation artifacts and quality of the truncation compensation (TC) was assessed visually in the MRMaps. In three additional patients MRMaps generated by algorithm TC2 could be compared to the ground truth of transmission-based attenuation maps obtained with a Siemens ECAT HR+ scanner. The influence of truncation on regional SUVs in lesions, other hot structures (bladder, kidney, myocardium) and the arms was assessed in suitable volume of interests (VOI). Results: Truncation compensated MRMaps exhibited residual artifacts in the arms in 16 patients for algorithm TC1 and to a lesser extent in eight patients for algorithm TC2. Compared to the transmission-based attenuation maps algorithm TC2 slightly overestimated the size of the truncated arms by 0.3 cm in the radial direction. Without truncation compensation, VOIs located in the trunk showed an average SUVmax underestimation of less than 5.4% relative to the results obtained with TC2. Inside the patients' arms underestimations up to 46.5% were found. Conclusion: In the trunk, standardized uptake values (SUV) underestimations due to truncation artifacts in the MRMap are rather small. Inside the arms, severe SUV underestimations can occur. Therefore, reliable TC is mandatory and can be achieved by applying the newly developed algorithm TC2 which has yielded promising results so far. Implementation of the proposed method is straightforward and should be easily adaptable to other PET/MR systems.

[1]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET , 2011, Nuklearmedizin.

[2]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[3]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Vincent Keereman,et al.  Simultaneous MR-Compatible Emission and Transmission Imaging for PET Using Time-of-Flight Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[6]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  H H Quick,et al.  The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction , 2013, Magma.

[9]  K. Bae,et al.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  K. Scheffler,et al.  MR‐based field‐of‐view extension in MR/PET: B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement (HUGE) , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  H. Quick,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging: MR-based attenuation correction of local radiofrequency surface coils. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  John Aldo Lee,et al.  Edge-Preserving Filtering of Images with Low Photon Counts , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Liane Oehme,et al.  Suitability of bilateral filtering for edge-preserving noise reduction in PET , 2011, EJNMMI research.

[19]  Zhiqiang Hu,et al.  Comparison of threshold-based and watershed-based segmentation for the truncation compensation of PET/MR images , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Truncation artifact on PET/CT: impact on measurements of activity concentration and assessment of a correction algorithm. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[22]  J. Hsieh,et al.  A novel reconstruction algorithm to extend the CT scan field-of-view. , 2004, Medical physics.

[23]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[25]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  PET/CT imaging artifacts. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[26]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[28]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.