The neural mechanisms underlying passive and active processing of numerosity

To investigate the difference in passive viewing and active processing of numerosity, we presented participants arrays of dots and concurrently measured their EEG. In the first condition, participants naïve to the subject under study passively viewed the dot-arrays. In the second condition, the participants were informed about the changes in numerosity and had to actively process numerosity. The visual properties of the dot-arrays were controlled and could therefore not explain possible numerosity related effects. The results revealed no numerosity related effects in the passive and active conditions. Instead, when the data was reorganised according to visual cue size (surface or diameter, etc.), strong effects of the visual cues were present at lateral occipital and parietal electrode sites. These electrode sites and time windows correspond to the ERP components often suggested to support numerosity processes. Furthermore, a larger central-parietal P3 amplitude effect was present for active versus passive numerosity processing. This result was not influenced by numerosity itself and could not be explained by response processing. It therefore appears to reflect general cognitive processes. Together, our results show that we do not (automatically) extract numerosity from a visual scene during passive or active processing of numerosity. Instead, these results are consistent with the notion that we rely on the continuous sensory properties of numerosity stimuli to make numerosity judgments.

[1]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[2]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[4]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009) , 2011, Cognition.

[5]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[7]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Norman Ginsburg.  Numerosity Estimation as a Function of Stimulus Organization , 1991, Perception.

[9]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Age-related Changes in the Activation of the Intraparietal Sulcus during Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing: An Event-related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[12]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children , 2009, Cognition.

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[15]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[16]  Wim Fias,et al.  Number Processing Pathways in Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Evidence against a strong association between numerical symbols and the quantities they represent , 2012, CogSci.

[18]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Contributions of primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to length and numerosity representation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Continuous visual properties explain neural responses to nonsymbolic number. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Number and density discrimination rely on a common metric: Similar psychophysical effects of size, contrast, and divided attention. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[29]  Wim Fias,et al.  Salience maps in parietal cortex: Imaging and computational modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Role of Visual Information in Numerosity Estimation , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  Conflict processing of symbolic and non-symbolic numerosity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[35]  Wim Fias,et al.  Stages of Nonsymbolic Number Processing in Occipitoparietal Cortex Disentangled by fMRI Adaptation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets , 2001 .

[37]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[38]  T. Tuulmets,et al.  Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Relationships between magnitude representation, counting and memory in 4- to 7-year-old children: A developmental study , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[40]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[42]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  False Approximations of the Approximate Number System? , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[44]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.