Elimination of visual field effects by use of a single report technique: Evidence for order-of-report artifact.

[1]  M. Bryden,et al.  A model for the sequential organization of behaviour. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Orbach,et al.  Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  H. Terrace,et al.  The effects of retinal and attention on the perception of words. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Ayres,et al.  Some artifactual causes of perceptual primacy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G. Sperling,et al.  Successive approximations to a model for short term memory. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Harcum Er,et al.  PRE- VERSUS POST-KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIRED REPRODUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1963 .

[8]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. , 1960 .

[9]  M. White,et al.  Laterality differences in perception: a review. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Bryden,et al.  LEFT-RIGHT DIFFERENCES IN TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[12]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1966 .

[13]  A. Elithorn,et al.  CEREBRAL DOMINANCE IN REACTION TIME RESPONSES. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[14]  W. A. Winnick,et al.  Signal detection approach to the study of retinal locus in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  R. Goldman,et al.  Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition as a function of order of report, expectancy, and training , 1969 .