Depressional wetland vegetation types: A question of plant community development

When wetland restoration includes re-establishing native plant taxa as an objective, an understanding of the variables driving the development of plant communities is necessary. With this in mind, we examined soil and physiographic characterstics of depressional wetlands of three vegetation types (cypressgum swamps, cypress savannas, and grass-sedge marshes) located in a fire-maintained longleaf pine ecosystem in southwestern Georgia, USA. Our objective was to establish wether plant community development in these wetlands is controlled primarily by hydrogeomorphic features or by different disturbance histories. We did not identify physical features that uniquely separate the wetland vegetation types. Instead, we observed a range of topo-edaphic conditions that likely drive variations in hydrologic regimes, which in turn, are probable influences on fire regime. We propose that several long-term successional trajectories may be initiated in the prolonged absence of fire, altered hydrology, or both, which link the distinctive vegetation types. Thus, a range of vegetation types may be suitable as potential restoration goals for these depressional wetlands. We suggest that the opportunities or constraints for use of prescribed fire in the long-term management of restored wetlands and adjacent uplands should be a significant consideration in the development of restoration strategies targeting specific plant communities.

[1]  R. Král,et al.  The ecology, status, and conservation of two non-alluvial wetland communities in the South Atlantic and eastern Gulf Coastal plain, USA , 1994 .

[2]  M. Lelong A TAXONOMIC TREATMENT OF THE GENUS PANICUM POACEAE IN MISSISSIPPI USA , 1986 .

[3]  B. Palik,et al.  USING LANDSCAPE HIERARCHIES TO GUIDE RESTORATION OF DISTURBED ECOSYSTEMS , 2000 .

[4]  L. Kirkman,et al.  Biodiversity in Southeastern, Seasonally Ponded, Isolated Wetlands: Management and Policy Perspectives for Research and Conservation , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  B. W. Taylor,et al.  Invertebrate communities of forested limesink wetlands in southwest Georgia, USA: Habitat use and influence of extended inundation , 1997, Wetlands.

[6]  Frank P. Day,et al.  Litter Decomposition Rates in the Seasonally Flooded Great Dismal Swamp , 1982 .

[7]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[8]  F. Day,et al.  ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS IN FOUR SEASONALLY FLOODED FOREST COMMUNITIES OF THE DISMAL SWAMP , 1988 .

[9]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  An Approach to Improving Decision-Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation , 1992 .

[10]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  VASCULAR PLANT BREAKDOWN IN FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 1986 .

[11]  M. Drew,et al.  Ecotone characterization between upland longleaf pine/wiregrass stands and seasonally-ponded isolated wetlands , 1998, Wetlands.

[12]  R. R. Sharitz,et al.  Ecology of southeastern shrub bogs (pocosins) and Carolina bays: a community profile , 1982 .

[13]  Thomas A. Spies,et al.  Ecological species groups of upland northern hardwood – hemlock forest ecosystems of the Sylvania Recreation Area, Upper Peninsula, Michigan , 1985 .

[14]  R. Sharitz,et al.  Vegetation Disturbance and Maintenance of Diversity in Intermittently Flooded Carolina Bays in South Carolina , 1994 .

[15]  R. Sharitz,et al.  Vegetation changes and land-use legacies of depression wetlands of the western coastal plain of South Carolina: 1951–1992 , 1996, Wetlands.

[16]  C. W. Ramm,et al.  Field sampling and data analysis methods for development of ecological land classifications: An application on the Manistee National Forest. Forest Service general technical report , 1993 .

[17]  M. M. Moore,et al.  DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS , 1997 .

[18]  E. L. Hendricks,et al.  Water-level fluctuations in limestone sinks in southwestern Georgia , 1952 .

[19]  V. J. Kilmer,et al.  METHODS OF MAKING MECHANICAL ANALYSES OF SOILS , 1949 .

[20]  H. J. Walker,et al.  Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province , 1987 .

[21]  E. Cypert The effects of fire in the Okefenokee Swamp in 1954 and 1955. , 1961 .

[22]  M. G. Messina,et al.  Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management , 1998 .

[23]  B. Hill Uptake and release of nutrients by aquatic macrophytes , 1979 .

[24]  W. M. Lewis,et al.  Wetlands : Characteristics and Boundaries , 1995 .

[25]  F. Day,et al.  Decay Rates and Nutrient Dynamics in Confined and Unconfined Leaf Litter in the Great Dismal Swamp , 1983 .

[26]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Are Small, Isolated Wetlands Expendable? , 1998 .

[27]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[28]  Barbara L. Bedford,et al.  The Need to Define Hydrologic Equivalence at the Landscape Scale for Freshwater Wetland Mitigation , 1996 .

[29]  J. Pearcy,et al.  Forest ecosystems of the Marietta Unit, Wayne National Forest, southeastern Ohio: multifactor classification and analysis , 1997 .

[30]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[31]  C. Craft Biology of Wetland Soils , 2000 .

[32]  A. Clewell Guide to the Vascular Plants of the Florida Panhandle , 1985 .

[33]  D. Demaree Submerging Experiments with Taxodium , 1932 .

[34]  Mark M. Brinson,et al.  The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation , 1996 .

[35]  E. Blood,et al.  The Role of the Floridan Aquifer in Depressional Wetlands Hydrodynamics and Hydroperiod , 1997 .

[36]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Avoiding the Old Pitfalls: Opportunities in a New Discipline , 1994 .