Low Impact of Traditional Risk Factors on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: The ELSA-Brasil Cohort

Objective—There is little information about how much traditional cardiovascular risk factors explain common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) variance. We aimed to study to which extent CCA-IMT values are determined by traditional risk factors and which commonly used measurements of blood pressure, glucose metabolism, lipid profile, and adiposity contribute the most to this determination in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) cohort baseline. Approach and Results—We analyzed 9792 individuals with complete data and CCA-IMT measurements. We built multiple linear regression models using mean left and right CCA-IMT as the dependent variable. All models were stratified by sex. We also analyzed individuals stratified by 10-year coronary heart disease risk and, in separate, those with no traditional risk factors. Main models’ R2 varied between 0.141 and 0.373. The major part of the explained variance in CCA-IMT was because of age and race. Indicators of blood pressure, lipid profile, and adiposity that most frequently composed the best models were pulse pressure, low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and neck circumference. The association between neck circumference and CCA-IMT persisted significant even after further adjustment for vessel sizes and body mass index. Indicators of glucose metabolism had smaller contribution. Conclusions—We found that >60% of CCA-IMT were not explained by demographic and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, which highlights the need to study novel risk factors. Pulse pressure, low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and neck circumference were the most consistent contributors.

[1]  R. Sacco,et al.  The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque in the Northern Manhattan Study. , 2015, Atherosclerosis.

[2]  J. Jeng,et al.  The Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (SPAD): Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[3]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Biomarkers of cardiovascular stress and subclinical atherosclerosis in the community. , 2014, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  Lianne Sheppard,et al.  Predictors of Carotid Thickness and Plaque Progression During a Decade: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2014, Stroke.

[5]  I. Benseñor,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness value distributions in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). , 2014, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  A. Guven,et al.  Serum uric acid and carotid artery intima media thickness in patients with masked hypertension , 2014, Acta cardiologica.

[7]  N. Wong,et al.  Neck Circumference Is Not Associated With Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Retired National Football League Players , 2014, Clinical cardiology.

[8]  L. Manzoli,et al.  Depression symptoms and the progression of carotid intima-media thickness: a 5-year follow-up study. , 2014, Atherosclerosis.

[9]  B. Duncan,et al.  Cohort Profile Cohort Profile : Longitudinal Study of Adult Health ( ELSA-Brasil ) , 2015 .

[10]  S. Koh,et al.  Adiponectin Provides Additional Information to Conventional Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Assessing the Risk of Atherosclerosis in Both Genders , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Neck Circumference, Carotid Wall Intima-Media Thickness, and Incident Stroke , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[12]  R. Sacco,et al.  Traditional Risk Factors Are Not Major Contributors to the Variance in Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , 2013, Stroke.

[13]  A. Orekhov,et al.  Association of Mitochondrial Genetic Variation with Carotid Atherosclerosis , 2013, PLoS ONE.

[14]  J. G. Mill,et al.  Afericoes e exames clinicos realizados nos participantes do ELSA-Brasil , 2013 .

[15]  J. Polak,et al.  Pulse pressure and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. , 2013, American journal of hypertension.

[16]  Eugene I. Drigalenko,et al.  Genetic Architecture of Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in Mexican Americans , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[17]  R. Sacco,et al.  Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors Explain the Minority of the Variability in Carotid Plaque , 2012, Stroke.

[18]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Socioeconomic Status, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young Adults: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study , 2012, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[19]  Moyses Szklo,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Practice of Epidemiology Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (elsa-brasil): Objectives and Design , 2022 .

[20]  J. Spence.  Carotid plaque measurement is superior to IMT Invited editorial comment on: carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis-Yoichi Inaba, M.D., Jennifer A. Chen M.D., Steven R. Bergmann M.D., Ph.D. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[21]  J. S. Dias-da-Costa,et al.  Racial inequalities in access to women's health care in southern Brazil. , 2011, Cadernos de saude publica.

[22]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[23]  J. D. Spenc.  711 CAROTID PLAQUE MEASUREMENT IS SUPERIOR TO IMT , 2011 .

[24]  Xue-ping Du,et al.  Neck Circumference Positively Related With Central Obesity, Overweight, and Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes: Beijing Community Diabetes Study 4 , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[25]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. , 2010, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[26]  Gilles Chironi,et al.  The value of carotid intima-media thickness for predicting cardiovascular risk. , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[27]  R. Virmani,et al.  Correlation between carotid intimal/medial thickness and atherosclerosis: a point of view from pathology. , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[28]  J. Recio-Rodríguez,et al.  Pulse pressure and nocturnal fall in blood pressure are predictors of vascular, cardiac and renal target organ damage in hypertensive patients (LOD-RISK study) , 2009, Blood pressure monitoring.

[29]  T. Laitinen,et al.  Pulse Pressure in Youth and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study , 2009, Stroke.

[30]  Matthias W. Lorenz,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Circulation.

[31]  Y. Yamasaki,et al.  Recent Advances of Intervention to Inhibit Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2006, Stroke.

[32]  Hafiz M. R. Khan,et al.  Differences between carotid wall morphological phenotypes measured by ultrasound in one, two and three dimensions. , 2005, Atherosclerosis.

[33]  A. Dart,et al.  Pulse pressure--a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  J. Lekakis,et al.  Pulse pressure in normotensives: a marker of cardiovascular disease. , 2001, American journal of hypertension.

[35]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Cross-sectional and 4-year longitudinal associations between brachial pulse pressure and common carotid intima-media thickness in a general population. The EVA study. , 1999, Stroke.

[36]  MahmoudZureik,et al.  Cross-Sectional and 4-Year Longitudinal Associations Between Brachial Pulse Pressure and Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in a General Population , 1999 .

[37]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Variance components analysis of carotid and femoral intima-media thickness measurements. REGRESS Study Group, Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[39]  J. Salonen,et al.  Determinants of carotid intima‐media thickness: a population‐based ultrasonography study in Eastern Finnish men , 1991, Journal of internal medicine.

[40]  P Pignoli,et al.  Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. , 1986, Circulation.

[41]  E. Falk,et al.  Mechanisms of Plaque Formation and Rupture , 2014 .

[42]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[43]  I. Benseñor,et al.  [Medical assessments and measurements in ELSA-Brasil]. , 2013, Revista de saude publica.

[44]  Steven R. Bergmann,et al.  Carotid plaque measurement is superior to IMT Invited editorial comment on: Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease , 2012 .

[45]  A. von Eckardstein,et al.  Is there a need for novel cardiovascular risk factors? , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.