Modularity and economic organization: concepts, theory, observations, and predictions

This paper addresses modularity as a basis for organizing economic activity. We first define the key concepts of architecture and of modularity as a special form of architecture. We then suggest how modular systems of all types may exhibit several properties of fundamental importance to the organization of economic activities, including greater adaptability and evolvability than systems that lack modular properties. We draw extensively on our original 1996 paper on modularity and subsequent research to suggest broad theoretical implications of modularity for (i) firms' product strategies and the nature of product market competition, (ii) the organization designs firms may adopt and the industry structures that can result when significant numbers of firms adopt modular product architectures, and (iii) learning processes and knowledge structures at the firm and industry levels in modular product markets. We also discuss an evolutionary perspective on modularity as an emergent phenomenon in firms and industries. We explain how modularity as a relatively new field of strategy and economic research may provide a new theoretical perspective on economic organizing that has significant potential for achieving important integrations of microeconomic and macroeconomic theory. We suggest some areas for further research that may be especially fruitful in this regard.

[1]  Matti Rossi,et al.  Architecture as a coordination tool in multi-site software development , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[2]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[3]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Detecting Coordination Problems in Collaborative Software Development Environments , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  R. Sanchez,et al.  The New Strategic Management: Organization, Competition, and Competence , 2003 .

[5]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  The innovator's non-dilemma: the case of next-generation lithography , 2008 .

[6]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity in the mediation of market and technology change , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Davide Consoli,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Change in UK Retail Banking Services: An Evolutionary Perspective , 2005 .

[8]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Product, Process, and Knowledge Architectures in Organizational Competence , 2003 .

[9]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[10]  R. Kevin Wood,et al.  Retrieving and Transferring Embodied Data: Implications for the Management of Interdependence Within Organizations , 1999 .

[11]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[12]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancement , 2004 .

[13]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[14]  M. Jacobides,et al.  The Dynamic Limits of Specialization: Vertical Integration Reconsidered , 2005 .

[15]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Interfirm Modularity and Its Implications for Product Development , 2005 .

[16]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[17]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence From the B-2 , 1999 .

[18]  R. Gulati,et al.  Adaptation in Vertical Relationships: Beyond Incentive Conflict , 2005 .

[19]  Tomoatsu Shibata,et al.  Empirical analysis of evolution of product architecture: Fanuc numerical controllers from 1962 to 1997 , 2005 .

[20]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[21]  Arvin Sahaym,et al.  The Influence of Information Technology on the Use of Loosely Coupled Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[22]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Architectures, coordination, and distance: Conway’s law and beyond , 1999 .

[23]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[24]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[25]  武石 彰 Bridging inter-and intra-firm boundaries : management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 1998 .

[26]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Pragmatic Collaborations: Advancing Knowledge While Controlling Opportunism , 2000 .

[27]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[28]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[29]  R. Sanchez,et al.  A systems view of the firm in competence-based competition , 1996 .

[30]  Judy E. Scott Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Measuring Modularity-Based Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Mass Customization Capability: A Customer-Driven Perspective , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[32]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organisational learning: new management processes for product creation , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[33]  R. Sanchez Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[34]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Coordination: Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth " Bomber , 2008 .

[35]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  management revue The International Review of Management Studies , 2004 .

[36]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[37]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[38]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[39]  John B. Rae,et al.  The Technical Development of Modern Aviation , 1971 .

[40]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing , 2007 .

[41]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[42]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[43]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .

[45]  R. Sanchez Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence , 2004 .

[46]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[47]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[48]  M. Porter How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[49]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Organization as a Nexus of Rules: Emergence in the Evolution of Systems of Exchange , 2010 .

[50]  M. Jacobides Industry Change Through Vertical Dis-Integration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking , 2004 .

[51]  G. Hoetker Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[52]  A. Tiwana Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances , 2008 .

[53]  A. Tiwana Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[54]  M. Hobday,et al.  Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: the Case of Flight Simulation , 1995 .

[55]  Lyra J. Colfer The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence on the Correspondence between the Structure of Products and Organizations , 2007 .

[56]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter‐firm learning , 2003 .

[57]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Creating Modular Platforms for Strategic Flexibility , 2010 .

[58]  Kirk Monteverde Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry , 1995 .

[59]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Competing—and Learning—in Modular Markets , 2001 .

[60]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study , 1994 .

[61]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .