Synergistic folding of two intrinsically disordered proteins: searching for conformational selection.

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) lack stable structures under physiological conditions but often fold into stable structures upon specific binding. These coupled binding and folding processes underlie the organization of cellular regulatory networks, and a mechanistic understanding is thus of fundamental importance. Here, we investigated the synergistic folding of two IDPs, namely, the NCBD domain of transcription coactivator CBP and the p160 steroid receptor coactivator ACTR, using a topology-based model that was carefully calibrated to balance intrinsic folding propensities and intermolecular interactions. As one of the most structured IDPs, NCBD is a plausible candidate that interacts through conformational selection-like mechanisms, where binding is mainly initiated by pre-existing folded-like conformations. Indeed, the simulations demonstrate that, even though binding and folding of both NCBD and ACTR is highly cooperative on the baseline level, the tertiary folding of NCBD is best described by the "extended conformational selection" model that involves multiple stages of selection and induced folding. The simulations further predict that the NCBD/ACTR recognition is mainly initiated by forming a mini folded core that includes the second and third helices of NCBD and ACTR. These predictions are fully consistent with independent physics-based atomistic simulations as well as a recent experimental mapping of the H/D exchange protection factors. The current work thus adds to the limited number of existing mechanistic studies of coupled binding and folding of IDPs, and provides a first direct demonstration of how conformational selection might contribute to efficient recognition of IDPs. Interestingly, even for highly structured IDPs like NCBD, the recognition is initiated by the more disordered C-terminal segment and with substantial contribution from induced folding. Together with existing studies of IDP interaction mechanisms, this argues that induced folding is likely prevalent in IDP-protein interaction, and emphasizes the importance of understanding how IDPs manage to fold efficiently upon (nonspecific) binding. Success of the current study also further supports the notion that, with careful calibration, topology-based models can be effective tools for mechanistic study of IDP interaction and regulation, especially when combined with physics-based atomistic simulations and experiments.

[1]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: a critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[6]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[7]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Insights from Coarse-Grained Gō Models for Protein Folding and Dynamics , 2009, International journal of molecular sciences.

[9]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Flexible nets , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[10]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Drugs for 'protein clouds': targeting intrinsically disordered transcription factors. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[12]  A. Caflisch,et al.  Kinetic analysis of molecular dynamics simulations reveals changes in the denatured state and switch of folding pathways upon single‐point mutation of a β‐sheet miniprotein , 2008, Proteins.

[13]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Flexible nets: disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[14]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Structured disorder and conformational selection , 2001, Proteins.

[15]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[16]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[17]  Arthur S Edison,et al.  Kinetics of folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein: the inhibitor of yeast aspartic proteinase YPrA. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Nonnative Interactions in Coupled Folding and Binding Processes of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Enzyme dynamics point to stepwise conformational selection in catalysis. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[20]  P. Wolynes Recent successes of the energy landscape theory of protein folding and function , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[21]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Fly-casting in protein-DNA binding: frustration between protein folding and electrostatics facilitates target recognition. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[23]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[24]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Sung-Hun Bae,et al.  NMR relaxation study of the complex formed between CBP and the activation domain of the nuclear hormone receptor coactivator ACTR. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[26]  I. Bahar,et al.  Discovery of novel Myc-Max heterodimer disruptors with a three-dimensional pharmacophore model. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declara... , 2008 .

[28]  Debabani Ganguly,et al.  Structural interpretation of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement-derived distances for disordered protein states. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Debabani Ganguly,et al.  Atomistic details of the disordered states of KID and pKID. Implications in coupled binding and folding. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  Andreas Vitalis,et al.  Characterizing the conformational ensemble of monomeric polyglutamine , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Capillarity theory for the fly-casting mechanism , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Donald Bashford,et al.  Disordered p27Kip1 exhibits intrinsic structure resembling the Cdk2/cyclin A-bound conformation. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Albert H. Mao,et al.  Role of backbone-solvent interactions in determining conformational equilibria of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Janice Bramham,et al.  Structural Diversity in p160/CREB-binding Protein Coactivator Complexes* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  S. Metallo,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins are potential drug targets. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[37]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[38]  István Simon,et al.  Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  István Simon,et al.  Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  H. Dyson,et al.  Unfolded proteins and protein folding studied by NMR. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[41]  E. Fraenkel,et al.  A small domain of CBP/p300 binds diverse proteins: solution structure and functional studies. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[42]  Timothy H. Click,et al.  Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in a Physics-Based World , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[43]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Qiang Lu,et al.  Exploring the mechanism of flexible biomolecular recognition with single molecule dynamics. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[45]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Network and graph analyses of folding free energy surfaces. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[48]  T. Oas,et al.  Conformational selection or induced fit: A flux description of reaction mechanism , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  H. Dyson,et al.  Linking folding and binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  The protein folding 'speed limit'. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[51]  Florian Praetorius,et al.  Mapping backbone and side-chain interactions in the transition state of a coupled protein folding and binding reaction , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Sending Signals Dynamically , 2009, Science.

[53]  P. Wright,et al.  Packing, specificity, and mutability at the binding interface between the p160 coactivator and CREB‐binding protein , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[55]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[56]  Debabani Ganguly,et al.  Topology‐based modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: Balancing intrinsic folding and intermolecular interactions , 2011, Proteins.

[57]  F. Rao,et al.  The protein folding network. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[60]  H. Dyson,et al.  Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein , 2007, Nature.

[61]  Yong Wang,et al.  Multi-Scaled Explorations of Binding-Induced Folding of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Inhibitor IA3 to its Target Enzyme , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[62]  Cheng Liu,et al.  Crystal structure of IRF-3 in complex with CBP. , 2005, Structure.

[63]  Wei Xu,et al.  Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators , 2002, Nature.

[64]  Jianhan Chen Intrinsically Disordered p53 Extreme C-Terminus Binds to S100B(ββ) through “Fly-Casting” , 2009 .

[65]  V. Hilser,et al.  Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  Assessing protein disorder and induced folding , 2005, Proteins.

[67]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Ronald D. Hills,et al.  Subdomain competition, cooperativity, and topological frustration in the folding of CheY. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  Eugene Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[70]  Andreas Vitalis,et al.  ABSINTH: A new continuum solvation model for simulations of polypeptides in aqueous solutions , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[71]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[72]  Kaare Teilum,et al.  Conformational selection in the molten globule state of the nuclear coactivator binding domain of CBP , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Ariele Viacava Follis,et al.  Multiple independent binding sites for small-molecule inhibitors on the oncoprotein c-Myc. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[74]  P. Rios,et al.  Complex network analysis of free-energy landscapes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Vincent A Voelz,et al.  Unfolded-state dynamics and structure of protein L characterized by simulation and experiment. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[76]  R. Levy,et al.  Protein folding pathways from replica exchange simulations and a kinetic network model. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  Caitlin L. Chicoine,et al.  Net charge per residue modulates conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  C. Chothia,et al.  Helix to helix packing in proteins. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[79]  John L Markley,et al.  Intrinsically disordered γ-subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase encodes functionally relevant transient secondary and tertiary structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  John Karanicolas,et al.  The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[81]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  DNA search efficiency is modulated by charge composition and distribution in the intrinsically disordered tail , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Roles of Phosphorylation and Helix Propensity in the Binding of the KIX Domain of CREB-binding Protein by Constitutive (c-Myb) and Inducible (CREB) Activators* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  S. Takada,et al.  Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: Induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[84]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Coarse-grained models of protein folding: toy models or predictive tools? , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[85]  Charles L Brooks,et al.  Coevolution of function and the folding landscape: correlation with density of native contacts. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[86]  Djamal Bouzida,et al.  Simulating disorder–order transitions in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins: Where folding meets binding , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Nonnative electrostatic interactions can modulate protein folding: molecular dynamics with a grain of salt. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[88]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[89]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[90]  J. Marsh,et al.  Sequence determinants of compaction in intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[91]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Structure of the p53 transactivation domain in complex with the nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CREB binding protein. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[92]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[93]  D. Eliezer,et al.  Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[94]  Joshua N Adkins,et al.  Functional consequences of preorganized helical structure in the intrinsically disordered cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1). , 2001, Biochemistry.

[95]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Protein folded states are kinetic hubs , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  John Karanicolas,et al.  Improved Gō-like models demonstrate the robustness of protein folding mechanisms towards non-native interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[97]  John Karanicolas,et al.  The structural basis for biphasic kinetics in the folding of the WW domain from a formin-binding protein: Lessons for protein design? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.