Embracing Paradox and Conflict: Towards a Conceptual Model to drive Project Portfolio Ambidexterity

Abstract An organisation’s portfolio of new product development (NPD) projects represents its potential for survival. Innovation ambidexterity holds the key to longevity. Accordingly, selecting the right projects for a portfolio critically impacts organisational success, both in the short and longer term. Selecting for successful portfolios is further complicated in dynamic, highly competitive and highly regulated markets. Furthermore, in current economies that demand value from investment, decision-making around project selection for the portfolio becomes even more crucial. However, there is a dearth of discussion and empirical evidence that focuses on project portfolio selection and more specifically in contexts of ambidexterity and ongoing change. Moreover, the tensions between exploratory and exploitative projects are likely to be made salient during project portfolio selection, and manifest in conflicts between different selection options, yet these tensions have not yet been addressed in the portfolio selection literature. Drawing on the current and heretofore non-connected literatures across fields of ambidexterity and paradox, project portfolio selection, cognition and performance control, this paper proposes an initial conceptual model of the factors that impact project portfolio selection and ambidexterity. This paper contributes to a greater appreciation of the pivotal role of project portfolio selection, as distinct from project and portfolio management, in generating a portfolio that drives organisational success. Moreover, it identifies performance measures and managing conflict as important determinants of project portfolio ambidexterity. Future work is required to enhance and validate this model.

[1]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands , 2016 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Woods.  Using Cognitive Conflict to Promote the Use of Dialectical Learning for Strategic Decision-Makers. , 2012 .

[3]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .

[4]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[5]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Project Portfolios in Dynamic Environments: Organizing for Uncertainty , 2012 .

[6]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  How control systems influence product innovation processes: examining the role of entrepreneurial orientation , 2015 .

[7]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures , 2007 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[9]  José Figueiredo,et al.  Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios , 2015 .

[10]  J. Mikkola.  Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management , 2001 .

[11]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TENSIONS: EXPLORING CONTRASTING STYLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[12]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[13]  Alexander Kock,et al.  Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success , 2013 .

[14]  Sascha Meskendahl.  The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success — A conceptual framework , 2010 .

[15]  Laila Kjiri,et al.  Project portfolio selection: Multi-criteria analysis and interactions between projects , 2015, ArXiv.

[16]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[17]  T. Laine,et al.  Management Control of Project Portfolio Uncertainty: A Managerial Role Perspective , 2014 .

[18]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do Firms Manage Strategic Dualities? A Process Perspective , 2016 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[20]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity Through the Lens of Paradox Theory , 2015 .

[21]  J. Swart,et al.  Making it happen: How managerial actions enable project-based ambidexterity , 2016 .

[22]  Sérgio Luis da Silva,et al.  Product-portfolio management: A framework based on Methods, Organization, and Strategy , 2014, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[23]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[24]  Mika Ylinen,et al.  The Effects of Organic and Mechanistic Control in Exploratory and Exploitative Innovations , 2014 .

[25]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[26]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[27]  Cheng-Yu Lee,et al.  Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance , 2012 .

[28]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Problems, New Solutions: Making Portfolio Management More Effective , 2000 .

[29]  Tony Davila,et al.  Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It , 2005 .

[30]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[31]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[32]  Antonio Dávila,et al.  Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies , 2009 .

[33]  Ian P. McCarthy,et al.  Achieving Contextual Ambidexterity in R&D Organizations: A Management Control System Approach , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  David S. Bedford,et al.  Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance , 2015 .

[35]  Alden S. Bean,et al.  Meet Your Competition: Results from the 1994 IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey , 1996 .

[36]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[38]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[39]  Donovan Hardenbrook.  Innovator's Guide to Growth: Putting Disruptive Innovation to Work. Edited by Scott D. Anthony, Mark W. Johnson, Joseph V. Sinfield, Elizabeth J. Altman , 2009 .

[40]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[41]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Dynamic Portfolio Selection of NPD Programs Using Marginal Returns , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[42]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[43]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[44]  Norman P. Archer,et al.  Project portfolio selection through decision support , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Wendy K. Smith.  Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[46]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[47]  S. Walsh,et al.  Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[48]  A. Griffin,et al.  Exploring Portfolio Decision‐Making Processes* , 2011 .

[49]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Creative Tension in the Innovation Process: How to Support the Right Capabilities , 2007 .

[50]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[51]  Ricardo Malagueño,et al.  Using Strategic Performance Measurement Systems for Strategy Formulation: Does It Work in Dynamic Environments? , 2012 .

[52]  N. Drouin,et al.  Advancing project and portfolio management research: Applying strategic management theories ☆ , 2012 .

[53]  R. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study , 2001 .

[54]  P. Eskerod,et al.  Project portfolio management - There's more to it than what management enacts , 2008 .

[55]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[56]  M. Martinsuo.  Project portfolio management in practice and in context , 2013 .

[57]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[58]  Frederik Ahlemann,et al.  Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment , 2015 .

[59]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Does Market Orientation Facilitate Balanced Innovation Programs? An Organizational Learning Perspective , 2007 .

[60]  Zannie Giraud Voss,et al.  Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Accounting and Control, Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Venturing into New Research Opportunities , 2009 .

[62]  R. Müller,et al.  Project Portfolio Control and Portfolio Management Performance in Different Contexts , 2008 .

[63]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets , 2008, Manag. Sci..