Teachers’ Views About Multiple Strategies in Middle and High School Mathematics

Despite extensive scholarship about the importance of teaching mathematics with multiple strategies in the elementary grades, there has been relatively little discussion of this practice in the middle and high school levels or in the context of introductory algebra. This article begins our exploration of this practice by addressing the following questions: (1) What do middle and high school Algebra I teachers describe as the advantages of instruction that includes a focus on multiple strategies?; and (2) What disadvantages to this practice do these teachers describe? Our analysis, based on the data from interviews (N= 13) and surveys (N= 79) conducted with experienced middle and secondary mathematics teachers, indicates that middle and secondary math teachers’ reported views surrounding multiple strategies appear to differ in important ways from those typically associated with teaching with multiple strategies in the elementary grades.

[1]  A. Thompson.  The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice , 1984 .

[2]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[3]  M. Lampert.  Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication , 1986 .

[4]  G. Leinhardt.  Development of an Expert Explanation: An Analysis of a Sequence of Subtraction Lessons , 1987, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[5]  M. Mclaughlin.  Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation , 1987 .

[6]  Sandra Hollingsworth,et al.  Prior Beliefs and Cognitive Change in Learning to Teach , 1989 .

[7]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Teachers' Pedagogical Content Beliefs in Mathematics , 1989 .

[8]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching , 1990 .

[9]  M. Mclaughlin.  The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities , 1990 .

[10]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Significant and Worthwhile Change in Teaching Practice , 1990 .

[11]  Carol V. Lloyd,et al.  The Relationship Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[12]  A. Thompson.  Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. , 1992 .

[13]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[14]  D. Kagan.  Implication of Research on Teacher Belief , 1992 .

[15]  M. Pajares,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct , 1992 .

[16]  D. Ball.  With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  S. Stodolsky,et al.  Content as Context: The Role of School Subjects in Secondary School Teaching , 1995 .

[18]  Alice J. Gill,et al.  Bridging second-grade children's thinking and mathematical recording , 1995 .

[19]  Susan S. Stodolsky,et al.  The Impact of Subject Matter on Curricular Activity: An Analysis of Five Academic Subjects , 1995 .

[20]  Z. Fang.  A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices , 1996 .

[21]  P. Cobb,et al.  Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .

[22]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Learning to Use Children's Thinking in Mathematics Instruction , 1996, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[23]  J. Kolodner.  Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[24]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction , 1998 .

[25]  James P. Spillane.  A Cognitive Perspective on the Role of the Local Educational Agency in Implementing Instructional Policy: Accounting for Local Variability , 1998 .

[26]  William M. Carroll.  Invented Computational Procedures of Students in a Standards-Based Curriculum , 1999 .

[27]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison in the Development of Categories , 1999 .

[28]  K. Fuson,et al.  Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms , 1999 .

[29]  J. Clement.  Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability , 2000 .

[30]  James P. Spillane.  Cognition and Policy Implementation: District Policymakers and the Reform of Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[31]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[32]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[33]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[34]  Vicki L. Wilkins,et al.  Teaching , 2001, Transcultural Graffiti.

[35]  D. Cohen,et al.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works , 2001 .

[36]  Terry Wood,et al.  Beyond Classical Pedagogy : Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 2001 .

[37]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research , 2002 .

[38]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[39]  Jr. Laurence E. Lynn.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Worksby David K. Cohen and Heather C. Hill. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2001. x+226 pp.; appendixes, notes, references, index. $35.00 (cloth). , 2003 .

[40]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Assessing Prospective Elementary School Teachers' Beliefs About Mathematics and Mathematics Learning: Rationale and Development of a Constructed-Response-Format Beliefs Survey , 2004 .

[41]  Kimberly Hufferd-Ackles,et al.  Describing Levels and Components of a Math-Talk Learning Community. , 2004 .

[42]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Middle School Students’ Understanding of Core Algebraic Concepts: Equivalence & Variable , 2005 .

[43]  C. Coburn.  The Role of Nonsystem Actors in the Relationship Between Policy and Practice: The Case of Reading Instruction in California , 2005 .

[44]  Robert T. Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative Studies in Special Education , 2005 .

[45]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom , 2005 .

[46]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. , 2007 .

[47]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Effects of Early Field Experiences on the Mathematical Content Knowledge and Beliefs of Prospective Elementary School Teachers: An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[48]  Roza Leikin,et al.  Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks , 2007 .

[49]  J. Wilkins.  The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices , 2008 .

[50]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell , 2008 .

[51]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Flexibility in Problem Solving: The Case of Equation Solving. , 2008 .

[52]  Candice L. Ridlon.  Learning Mathematics via a Problem-Centered Approach: A Two-Year Study , 2009 .

[53]  Andrew Izsák,et al.  Meta-Representation in an Algebra I Classroom , 2009 .

[54]  Despina A. Stylianou.  Teachers’ conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics , 2010 .

[55]  Facilitating use of multiple strategies in a high poverty classroom through problem-based instruction , 2010 .

[56]  Jon R. Star,et al.  The Power of Comparison in Learning and Instruction: Learning Outcomes Supported by Different Types of Comparisons , 2011 .

[57]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Early algebraization : a global dialogue from multiple perspectives , 2011 .

[58]  Margaret Smith.  A Procedural Focus and a Relationship Focus to Algebra: How U.S. Teachers and Japanese Teachers Treat Systems of Equations , 2011 .

[59]  Karen S. Karp,et al.  Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. , 2012 .

[60]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics , 2013 .

[61]  J. Star,et al.  Exploring the nature and impact of model teaching with worked example pairs , 2013 .

[62]  D. Ball.  Teaching, With Respect to Mathematics and Students , 2014 .

[63]  Murat Akkuş.  The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics , 2015 .

[64]  Developing thinking abilities in arithmetic class , 2016 .