Comparison of Low-Cost Commercial Unpiloted Digital Aerial Photogrammetry to Airborne Laser Scanning across Multiple Forest Types in California, USA

Science-based forest management requires quantitative estimation of forest attributes traditionally collected via sampled field plots in a forest inventory program. Three-dimensional (3D) remotely sensed data such as Light Detection and Ranging (lidar), are increasingly utilized to supplement and even replace field-based forest inventories. However, lidar remains cost prohibitive for smaller areas and repeat measurements, often limiting its use to single acquisitions of large contiguous areas. Recent advancements in unpiloted aerial systems (UAS), digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) and high precision global positioning systems (HPGPS) have the potential to provide low-cost time and place flexible 3D data to support forest inventory and monitoring. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of low-cost commercial off the shelf UAS DAP and HPGPS to create accurate 3D data and predictions of key forest attributes, as compared to both lidar and field observations, in a wide range of forest conditions in California, USA. A secondary objective was to assess the accuracy of nadir vs. off-nadir UAS DAP, to determine if oblique imagery provides more accurate 3D data and forest attribute predictions. UAS DAP digital terrain models (DTMs) were comparable to lidar DTMS across most sites and nadir vs. off-nadir imagery collection (R2 = 0.74–0.99), although model accuracy using off-nadir imagery was very low in mature Douglas-fir forest (R2 = 0.17) due to high canopy density occluding the ground from the image sensor. Surface and canopy height models were shown to have less agreement to lidar (R2 = 0.17–0.69), with off-nadir imagery surface models at high canopy density sites having the lowest agreement with lidar. UAS DAP models predicted key forest metrics with varying accuracy compared to field data (R2 = 0.53–0.85), and were comparable to predictions made using lidar. Although lidar provided more accurate estimates of forest attributes across a range of forest conditions, this study shows that UAS DAP models, when combined with low-cost HPGPS, can accurately predict key forest attributes across a range of forest types, canopies densities, and structural conditions.

[1]  L. Heath,et al.  Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species , 2014 .

[2]  Harold S. J. Zald,et al.  Do forest fuel reduction treatments confer resistance to beetle infestation and drought mortality? , 2021, Ecosphere.

[3]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulating the impacts of error in species and height upon tree volume derived from airborne laser scanning data , 2014 .

[4]  Masayuki Itoh,et al.  Estimating Tree Height and Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) from Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Obtained with an Unmanned Aerial System for a Japanese Cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) Forest , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[6]  C. Woodall,et al.  Imputing forest carbon stock estimates from inventory plots to a nationally continuous coverage , 2013, Carbon Balance and Management.

[7]  Neal C. Swayze,et al.  Influence of flight parameters on UAS-based monitoring of tree height, diameter, and density , 2021 .

[8]  Gregory J. McDermid,et al.  Assessing the Value of UAV Photogrammetry for Characterizing Terrain in Complex Peatlands , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inventory of Small Forest Areas Using an Unmanned Aerial System , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Peter Surový,et al.  UAV RTK/PPK Method - An Optimal Solution for Mapping Inaccessible Forested Areas? , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  A new approach with DTM-independent metrics for forest growing stock prediction using UAV photogrammetric data , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[12]  M. Gillis,et al.  Monitoring Canada's forests: The National Forest Inventory , 2005 .

[13]  H. Pretzsch.  Description and Analysis of Stand Structures , 2009 .

[14]  Danny Pfeffermann,et al.  Small Area Estimation , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[15]  Wade T. Tinkham,et al.  Influence of Agisoft Metashape Parameters on UAS Structure from Motion Individual Tree Detection from Canopy Height Models , 2021 .

[16]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Assessing the Ability of Image Based Point Clouds Captured from a UAV to Measure the Terrain in the Presence of Canopy Cover , 2019, Forests.

[17]  Blake M. Allan,et al.  The application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to estimate above-ground biomass of mangrove ecosystems , 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[18]  H. Andersen,et al.  Using multilevel remote sensing and ground data to estimate forest biomass resources in remote regions: a case study in the boreal forests of interior Alaska , 2011 .

[19]  Janet L. Ohmann,et al.  Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest- neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A. , 2002 .

[20]  Mukunda Dev Behera,et al.  Lidar remote sensing for forestry applications: The Indian context , 2002 .

[21]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services , 2012 .

[22]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Area-Based and Individual Tree-Based Methods for Predicting Plot-Level Forest Attributes , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Sarah Parks,et al.  An effective assessment protocol for continuous geospatial datasets of forest characteristics using USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data , 2010 .

[24]  D. Morton,et al.  Quantifying Boreal Forest Structure and Composition Using UAV Structure from Motion , 2018 .

[25]  S. Goetz,et al.  UAV‐derived estimates of forest structure to inform ponderosa pine forest restoration , 2019, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[26]  Margaret M. Moore,et al.  Evaluating Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images for Estimating Forest Canopy Fuels in a Ponderosa Pine Stand , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  An Easy-to-Use Airborne LiDAR Data Filtering Method Based on Cloth Simulation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[28]  Harold S. J. Zald,et al.  Influence of lidar, Landsat imagery, disturbance history, plot location accuracy, and plot size on accuracy of imputation maps of forest composition and structure , 2014 .

[29]  Barbara Koch,et al.  UAV Photogrammetry of Forests as a Vulnerable Process. A Sensitivity Analysis for a Structure from Motion RGB-Image Pipeline , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Carlos Cabo,et al.  Structure from Motion Photogrammetry in Forestry: a Review , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[31]  Scott L. Powell,et al.  Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing , 2014 .

[32]  Hailemariam Temesgen,et al.  A comparison of selected parametric and imputation methods for estimating snag density and snag quality attributes , 2012 .

[33]  Markus Gerke,et al.  Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns , 2016 .

[34]  Nikolay S. Strigul,et al.  Augmentation of Traditional Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning with Unmanned Aerial Systems and Photogrammetry for Forest Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[35]  Tetsuji Ota,et al.  Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Structure from Motion Approach with Aerial Photographs in a Seasonal Tropical Forest , 2015 .

[36]  Pedro Pina,et al.  Assessment of the Influence of Survey Design and Processing Choices on the Accuracy of Tree Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Measurements Using UAV-Based Photogrammetry , 2021, Drones.

[37]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[38]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[39]  D. Lu.  The potential and challenge of remote sensing‐based biomass estimation , 2006 .

[40]  Jeongho Cho,et al.  Delaunay Triangulation-Based Spatial Clustering Technique for Enhanced Adjacent Boundary Detection and Segmentation of LiDAR 3D Point Clouds , 2019, Sensors.

[41]  Mary H. Nichols,et al.  Considerations for Achieving Cross-Platform Point Cloud Data Fusion across Different Dryland Ecosystem Structural States , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[42]  Satoshi Tsuyuki,et al.  The use of fixed-wing UAV photogrammetry with LiDAR DTM to estimate merchantable volume and carbon stock in living biomass over a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[43]  Yanjun Su,et al.  A practical method for SRTM DEM correction over vegetated mountain areas , 2014 .

[44]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation Structure Using Computer Vision , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  lidR: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data , 2020 .

[46]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[47]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Combining national forest inventory field plots and remote sensing data for forest databases , 2008 .

[48]  Fabio Tozeto Ramos,et al.  Airborne vision‐based mapping and classification of large farmland environments , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[49]  H. Andersen,et al.  Large Area Forest Yield Estimation with Pushbroom Digital Aerial Photogrammetry , 2019, Forests.

[50]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Area-based vs tree-centric approaches to mapping forest carbon in Southeast Asian forests from airborne laser scanning data , 2017 .

[51]  Ryan L. Perroy,et al.  Assessing the impacts of canopy openness and flight parameters on detecting a sub-canopy tropical invasive plant using a small unmanned aerial system , 2017 .