Sensitivity-free damage identification based on incomplete modal data, sparse regularization and alternating minimization approach

Abstract The incomplete modal data is mostly measured for experimental and engineering structures, however, its application into structural damage identification suffers from the drawback that the amount of the incomplete modal data is often insufficient, rendering the identification very sensitive to the measurement noise. Aiming to overcome this drawback, this paper proposes a new damage identification approach that combines the incomplete modal data with the sparse regularization. The realization of the proposed damage identification approach is mainly threefold: (a) The first is the establishment of a new goal function which is decoupled with respect to the damage parameters. To this end, the decomposition of the stiffness matrix so that the damage parameters are contained in a diagonal matrix must be introduced. (b) The second is the application of the alternating minimization approach to get the solution of the new goal function. (c) The third is the development of a novel and simple threshold setting method to properly determine the sparse regularization parameter. The feature of the proposed damage identification approach lies in that the sensitivity analysis is not involved and the exact orders of the modal data are not demanded. Numerical and experimental examples are conducted to verify the proposed damage identification approach. As a result, the proposed new goal function along with the sparse regularization indeed improves the accuracy and robustness for damage identification, in comparison to the cases when no regularization is used with the new goal function and when the Tikhonov regularization is incorporated into the conventional nonlinear least-squares goal function. Moreover, the proposed damage identification approach can work for various types of structures and even for only frequency measurements.

[1]  Ying Wang,et al.  Damage Identification Scheme Based on Compressive Sensing , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[2]  Yuequan Bao,et al.  Selection of regularization parameter for l1-regularized damage detection , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[3]  M. A. Lukas Robust generalized cross-validation for choosing the regularization parameter , 2006 .

[4]  F. Bakhtiari-Nejad,et al.  A structural damage detection method using static noisy data , 2005 .

[5]  Keith Hjelmstad,et al.  CRACK IDENTIFICATION IN A CANTILEVER BEAM FROM MODAL RESPONSE , 1996 .

[6]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Compressed sensing techniques for detecting damage in structures , 2013 .

[7]  Shun Weng,et al.  L1 regularization approach to structural damage detection using frequency data , 2015 .

[8]  Scott W. Doebling,et al.  Minimum-rank optimal update of elemental stiffness parameters for structural damage identification , 1996 .

[9]  Kurt Bryan,et al.  Making Do with Less: An Introduction to Compressed Sensing , 2013, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Eric M. Hernandez,et al.  Identification of Localized Structural Damage from Highly Incomplete Modal Information: Theory and Experiments , 2016 .

[11]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[12]  P. G. Bakir,et al.  Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm , 2007 .

[13]  Nam-Gyu Park,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING SPATIALLY INCOMPLETE FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTIONS , 2003 .

[14]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  Flaw detection in sandwich plates based on time-harmonic response using genetic algorithm , 2001 .

[15]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification , 2014 .

[16]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Yong Xia,et al.  Structural damage detection based on l1 regularization using natural frequencies and mode shapes , 2018 .

[18]  Li Wang,et al.  An enhanced response sensitivity approach for structural damage identification: convergence and performance , 2017 .

[19]  H. I. Epstein,et al.  The effect of curvature on Stoneley waves , 1976 .

[20]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[21]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS FOR DAMAGE DETECTION IN SMART STRUCTURES , 1997 .

[22]  Nikos A. Aspragathos,et al.  Identification of crack location and magnitude in a cantilever beam from the vibration modes , 1990 .

[23]  H. Y. Hwang,et al.  Damage detection in structures using a few frequency response measurements , 2004 .

[24]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[25]  Mohamed Kaouk,et al.  Structural damage assessment using a generalized minimum rank perturbation theory , 1993 .

[26]  Than Soe Maung,et al.  Regularised finite element model updating using measured incomplete modal data , 2014 .

[27]  Jared Tanner,et al.  Explorer Compressed Sensing : How Sharp Is the Restricted Isometry Property ? , 2011 .

[28]  F. Hemez,et al.  Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology , 1993 .

[29]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  1 Trend Filtering , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[30]  M. D. Paola,et al.  An Integral Equation for Damage Identification of Euler-Bernoulli Beams under Static Loads , 2004 .

[31]  S. S. Law,et al.  Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection , 2007 .

[32]  Z. Yao,et al.  Structural damage identification using static test data and changes in frequencies , 2001 .

[33]  C. D. Zhang,et al.  Comparative studies on damage identification with Tikhonov regularization and sparse regularization , 2016 .

[34]  Branislav Titurus,et al.  Regularization in model updating , 2008 .

[35]  Stéphane Pagano,et al.  Identification of Mechanical Properties by Displacement Field Measurement: A Variational Approach , 2003 .

[36]  Amir Beck,et al.  On the Convergence of Alternating Minimization for Convex Programming with Applications to Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares and Decomposition Schemes , 2015, SIAM J. Optim..

[37]  Michael Link,et al.  Damage identification by multi-model updating in the modal and in the time domain , 2009 .

[38]  Ning Hu,et al.  Damage assessment of structures using modal test data , 2001 .

[39]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  REGULARIZATION TOOLS: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems , 1994, Numerical Algorithms.

[40]  Zhengqi Lu,et al.  Damage identification in plates using finite element model updating in time domain , 2013 .

[41]  Hamid Ahmadian,et al.  Generic element matrices suitable for finite element model updating , 1995 .

[42]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Generalized Cross-Validation Approach to Regularization Parameter Estimation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[43]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[44]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory , 1994 .