Cell-specific and pH-activatable rubyrin-loaded nanoparticles for highly selective near-infrared photodynamic therapy against cancer.

Spatiotemporal control of singlet oxygen ((1)O2) release is a major challenge for photodynamic therapy (PDT) against cancer with high therapeutic efficacy and minimum side effects. Here a selenium-rubyrin (NMe2Se4N2)-loaded nanoparticle functionalized with folate (FA) was designed and synthesized as an acidic pH-activatable targeted photosensitizer. The nanoparticles could specifically recognize cancer cells via the FA-FA receptor binding and were selectively taken up by cancer cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter lysosomes, in which NMe2Se4N2 was activated to produce (1)O2. The pH-controllable release of (1)O2 specially damaged the lysosomes and thus killed cancer cells in a lysosome-associated pathway. The introduction of selenium into the rubyrin core enhanced the (1)O2 generation efficiency due to the heavy atom effect, and the substitution of dimethylaminophenyl moiety at meso-position led to the pH-controllable activation of NMe2Se4N2. Under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, NMe2Se4N2 possessed high singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) at an acidic pH (ΦΔ = 0.69 at pH 5.0 at 635 nm) and could be deactivated at physiological pH (ΦΔ = 0.06 at pH 7.4 at 635 nm). The subcellular location-confined pH-activatable photosensitization at NIR region and the cancer cell-targeting feature led to excellent capability to selectively kill cancer cells and prevent the damage to normal cells, which greatly lowered the side effects. Through intravenous injection of FA-NMe2Se4N2 nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice, tumor elimination was observed after NIR irradiation. This work presents a new paradigm for specific PDT against cancer and provides a new avenue for preparation of highly efficient photosensitizers.

[1]  Manivannan Ethirajan,et al.  The role of porphyrin chemistry in tumor imaging and photodynamic therapy. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[2]  Samuel Achilefu,et al.  In vivo targeted deep-tissue photodynamic therapy based on near-infrared light triggered upconversion nanoconstruct. , 2013, ACS nano.

[3]  Brian C. Wilson,et al.  Direct Near‐infrared Luminescence Detection of Singlet Oxygen Generated by Photodynamic Therapy in Cells In Vitro and Tissues In Vivo ¶ , 2002 .

[4]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Imidazole-modified porphyrin as a pH-responsive sensitizer for cancer photodynamic therapy. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[5]  Anirban Sen Gupta,et al.  Photodynamic nanomedicine in the treatment of solid tumors: perspectives and challenges. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  R. Jain,et al.  Photodynamic therapy for cancer , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  W. Fong,et al.  A pH-responsive fluorescence probe and photosensitiser based on a tetraamino silicon(IV) phthalocyanine. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[8]  B. Wilson,et al.  Photodynamic molecular beacon as an activatable photosensitizer based on protease-controlled singlet oxygen quenching and activation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer-doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Patrizia Agostinis,et al.  Molecular effectors of multiple cell death pathways initiated by photodynamic therapy. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  N. Oleinick,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy-induced Apoptosis in Epidermoid Carcinoma Cells , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Ana B. Descalzo,et al.  Synthesis and properties of fused-ring-expanded porphyrins that were core-modified with Group 16 heteroatoms. , 2012, Chemistry.

[13]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[14]  P. Hammond,et al.  Controlling in vivo stability and biodistribution in electrostatically assembled nanoparticles for systemic delivery. , 2011, Nano letters.

[15]  R. Gillies,et al.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  F. Dosio,et al.  Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential , 2006, International journal of nanomedicine.

[17]  T. K. Chandrashekar,et al.  STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MESO ARYL SAPPHYRINS , 1999 .

[18]  I. Tannock,et al.  Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. , 1989, Cancer research.

[19]  Xing Chen,et al.  Cell-selective metabolic glycan labeling based on ligand-targeted liposomes. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  S. Santra,et al.  Cell-specific, activatable, and theranostic prodrug for dual-targeted cancer imaging and therapy. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  V. Turk,et al.  Lysosomes and lysosomal cathepsins in cell death. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  T. K. Chandrashekar,et al.  Meso-tetrakis(p-sulfonatophenyl)N-confused porphyrin tetrasodium salt: a potential sensitizer for photodynamic therapy. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Ronnie H. Fang,et al.  Quick synthesis of lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles with low polydispersity using a single-step sonication method. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. , 2004, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[25]  Mei-Rong Ke,et al.  A pH-responsive fluorescent probe and photosensitiser based on a self-quenched phthalocyanine dimer. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[26]  E. Akkaya,et al.  Thinking outside the silicon box: molecular and logic as an additional layer of selectivity in singlet oxygen generation for photodynamic therapy. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  P. Messersmith,et al.  Catechol Polymers for pH-Responsive, Targeted Drug Delivery to Cancer Cells , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  Stanley B. Brown,et al.  The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: an emerging paradigm. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[30]  S. Ganta,et al.  A review of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[31]  Baowei Fei,et al.  Highly efficient drug delivery with gold nanoparticle vectors for in vivo photodynamic therapy of cancer. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  D. Xing,et al.  Cell death via mitochondrial apoptotic pathway due to activation of Bax by lysosomal photodamage. , 2011, Free radical biology & medicine.

[33]  Kai Yang,et al.  Graphene in mice: ultrahigh in vivo tumor uptake and efficient photothermal therapy. , 2010, Nano letters.

[34]  Ana B. Descalzo,et al.  A core-modified rubyrin with meso-aryl substituents and phenanthrene-fused pyrrole rings: a highly conjugated near-infrared dye and Hg2+ probe. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy,et al.  Heteroatom Substitution Induced Changes in Excited-State Photophysics and Singlet Oxygen Generation in Chalcogenoxanthylium Dyes: Effect of Sulfur and Selenium Substitutions† , 2004 .

[36]  D. Euhus,et al.  Tumor measurement in the nude mouse , 1986, Journal of surgical oncology.

[37]  Yifan Ma,et al.  Indocyanine green-loaded biodegradable tumor targeting nanoprobes for in vitro and in vivo imaging. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[38]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[39]  Xunbin Wei,et al.  pH‐Activated Near‐Infrared Fluorescence Nanoprobe Imaging Tumors by Sensing the Acidic Microenvironment , 2010 .

[40]  Klaus Suhling,et al.  Imaging intracellular viscosity of a single cell during photoinduced cell death. , 2009, Nature chemistry.

[41]  Kai Yang,et al.  Organic stealth nanoparticles for highly effective in vivo near-infrared photothermal therapy of cancer. , 2012, ACS nano.

[42]  Yifan Ma,et al.  Single-step assembly of DOX/ICG loaded lipid--polymer nanoparticles for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy. , 2013, ACS nano.

[43]  A. B. Descalzo,et al.  meso-Aryl phenanthroporphyrins: synthesis and spectroscopic properties. , 2011, Chemistry.

[44]  Muthu Kumara Gnanasammandhan,et al.  In vivo photodynamic therapy using upconversion nanoparticles as remote-controlled nanotransducers , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[45]  Y. Urano,et al.  Design and development of enzymatically activatable photosensitizer based on unique characteristics of thiazole orange. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  Rongrong Wang,et al.  Application of poly(ethylene glycol)–distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-DSPE) block copolymers and their derivatives as nanomaterials in drug delivery , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[47]  Michael J. Hall,et al.  Supramolecular photonic therapeutic agents. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[48]  D. Ramaiah,et al.  Tuning photosensitized singlet oxygen generation efficiency of novel aza-BODIPY dyes. , 2010, Organic letters.

[49]  Marc Dellian,et al.  Acid production in glycolysis-impaired tumors provides new insights into tumor metabolism. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.