Enterprise Architecture Model: an approach proposition A case study of information systems in the hospitality industry

This paper discusses the role of enterprise architecture representation, in the context of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) information systems, as an instrument for an organization to reflect on itself and develop its business strategies and respective alignment with Information Systems. The paper proposes a representation model of enterprise architecture, as a tool for recommending good practices, and it emerges from a case study undertaken in the context of and investigation on advantages and limitations of ERP systems in the hospitality industry. The proposed approach is also inspired on other academic or market propositions suitable for the objectives of the investigation. It consists on a set of items representing the steps that must be taken by top managers and IS managers. With the purpose of identifying major critical success factors when implementing ERP systems, as well as factors that may obstruct organizations from being competitive, a case study was carried out based on data gathered on an important economic Portuguese group. The study also intended to understand how the hospitality industry can solve the problem of the disintegration of information of the various implemented business applications. The research did not seek to confirm or refute hypotheses or the quantitative measurement of the influence of variables in a particular phenomenon. Instead, it attempted to answer proposed questions, interpreting, through the systematic analysis of the collected data, ratings, perceptions, needs and limitations of IS/IT submitted by the people involved in the study.

[1]  Melita Kozina Evaluation of ARIS and Zachman Frameworks as Enterprise Architectures , 2006 .

[2]  Anand Teltumbde,et al.  A framework for evaluating ERP projects , 2000 .

[3]  Trevor A. Spedding,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[4]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[5]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: emperical evidence from Canadian organizations , 2003 .

[6]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Information system integration , 2000, CACM.

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  David Garlan,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Software Architecture , 1995, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  Injazz J. Chen,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementations: Theory and Practice , 2008, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[12]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[13]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility And Change , 2004, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[14]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[15]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[16]  Michael Tiemann,et al.  UPDATING THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING MODEL , 2006 .

[17]  Steven C. Hill,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology , 1993 .

[18]  Birdoğan Baki,et al.  Determining the ERP package-selecting criteria: The case of Turkish manufacturing companies , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[19]  Robert Winter,et al.  Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-IT approach , 2008, SAC '08.