Coping with Illness Online: The Case of Patients'Online Communities

This article identifies and analyzes characteristics of patients' online communities (POC) in Sweden. Using a qualitative approach, it presents a fine-grained picture of the communities covering both the structural and cultural factors. Acknowledging the debate about quality of health information online and the potential risks of e-health, the article argues that a deeper understanding of the dynamics of POC, which offer unique aides for the coping process of chronically ill patients, can contribute to the design of the emergent forms of Internet-based health care resources.

[1]  P. Reeves.  Coping in Cyberspace: The Impact of Internet Use on the Ability of HIV-Positive Individuals to Deal with Their Illness , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[2]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The internet and health communication : experience and expectations , 2001 .

[4]  Beatrice A. Wright,et al.  Physical disability - a psychosocial approach, 2nd ed. , 1983 .

[5]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  A survey of patient-provider e-mail communication: what do patients think? , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Flis Henwood,et al.  Turned on or Turned Off? Accessing health information on the Internet , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  P. Kollock.  DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR ONLINE COMMUNITIES , 1997 .

[8]  J. K. Johnsen,et al.  Social support in a wired world: Use of online mental health forums in Norway , 2002, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[9]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[10]  N. Baym.  The emergence of on-line community , 1998 .

[11]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[12]  M. Hardey.  'E-health': the internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge , 2001 .

[13]  M. Hardey.  Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[14]  Agneta Ranerup,et al.  Consumerism revisited: The emergent roles of new electronic intermediaries between citizens and the public sector , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[15]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Janine Pierret,et al.  The illness experience: state of knowledge and perspectives for research. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[17]  Ann-Christine Gullacksen.  När smärtan blir en del av livet , 1999 .

[18]  R. Rice,et al.  The Internet and Health Communication , 2000 .

[19]  K. McPherson,et al.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  M. Cain,et al.  The future of the Internet in healthcare: a five-year forecast. , 2000, Hospital quarterly.

[21]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Etiquette online: from nice to necessary , 2004, CACM.

[22]  J. Finn,et al.  An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. , 1999, Health & social work.

[23]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Mobile Virtual Healthcare Communities : An Approach To Community Engineering For Cancer Patients , 2002, ECIS.

[24]  M. White,et al.  Receiving social support online: implications for health education. , 2001, Health education research.

[25]  David Myers.  “Anonymity is part of the magic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts , 1987 .

[26]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[27]  R. Elizabeth,et al.  Electropolis: Communication and community on internet relay chat , 1991 .

[28]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the Physician–Patient Relationship , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[30]  L. Griffiths,et al.  Humour as resistance to professional dominance in community mental health teams , 1998 .

[31]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory , 1993 .

[32]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[33]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[34]  Beatrice A. Wright,et al.  Physical disability--a psychological approach , 1960 .

[35]  Malin Sveningsson.  Creating a sense of community : Experiences from a Swedish web chat , 2001 .

[36]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. , 1999, Archives of dermatology.

[37]  Charles E. Kahn,et al.  Design and implementation of an Internet-based health information resource , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[38]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[39]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Information Exchange in Virtual Communities: A Comparative Study , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  T. Ferguson,et al.  Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: a new partnership for high quality health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  Laurel Nan Hellerstein.  The social use of electronic communication at a major university , 1986 .