A performance comparison of convolutional neural network based anthropomorphic model observer and linear model observer for signal-known statistically detection tasks

Signal-known-statistically (SKS) detection task is more relevant to the clinical tasks compared to signal-knownexactly (SKE) detection task. However, anthropomorphic model observers for SKS tasks have not been studied as much as those for SKE tasks. In this study, we compare the ability of conventional model observers (i.e., channelized Hotelling observer and nonprewhitening observer with an eye-filter) and convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict human observer performance on SKS and background-known-statistically tasks in breast cone beam CT images. For model observers, we implement 1) the model which combines the responses of each signal template and 2) two-layer CNN. We implement two-layer CNN in linear and nonlinear schemes. Nonlinear CNN contains max pooling layer and nonlinear activation function which are not contained in linear CNN. Both linear and nonlinear CNN based model observers predict the rank of human observer performance for different noise structures better than conventional model observers.

[1]  Hua Li,et al.  Approximating the Ideal Observer and Hotelling Observer for Binary Signal Detection Tasks by Use of Supervised Learning Methods , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[3]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  Investigation on slice direction dependent detectability of volumetric cone beam CT images. , 2016, Optics express.

[5]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  Andrew L. Maas Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models , 2013 .

[7]  Byeongjoon Kim,et al.  Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Xiaogang Wang,et al.  Medical image classification with convolutional neural network , 2014, 2014 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV).

[11]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[12]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[14]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Mass detection on mammograms: influence of signal shape uncertainty on human and model observers. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.