Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia.

PURPOSE To determine the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia. METHODS Fifty-five subjects with anisometropic myopia were recruited. None of them had amblyopia. Refractive error and axial length were measured in each subject. Ocular dominance was determined using the hole-in-the-card test and convergence near-point test. RESULTS There was a threshold level of anisometropia (1.75 D) beyond which the dominant eye was always more myopic than the nondominant eye. Of the 33 subjects with anisometropia of < or =1.75 D, the dominant eye was more myopic in 17 (51.5%) subjects. Dominant eyes, determined by the hole-in-the-card test, had a significantly greater myopic spherical equivalent (-5.27 +/- 2.45 D) than nondominant eyes (-3.94 +/- 3.10 D; P < 0.001). Dominant eyes also had a longer axial length than nondominant eyes (25.15 +/- 0.96 mm vs. 24.69 +/- 1.17 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). The difference was more evident in those subjects with higher anisometropia (>1.75 D), but was not significant in those with lower anisometropia (< or =1.75 D). Similar results were obtained using the convergence near-point test. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows that the dominant eye has a greater degree of myopia than the nondominant eye in subjects with anisometropic myopia. Taking ocular dominance into account in the design of randomized clinical trails to assess the efficacy of myopia interventions may provide useful information.

[1]  B. Curtin,et al.  Unilateral high myopia in childhood: clinical characteristics and treatment. , 1976, The American orthoptic journal.

[2]  J. D. Abrams The Myopias , 1987 .

[3]  Ahmad M Mansour,et al.  Hand dominance, eye laterality and refraction. , 2003, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[4]  Joanne Katz,et al.  Epidemiology of myopia. , 2002, Epidemiologic Reviews.

[5]  E. Ball,et al.  A study of consensual accommodation. , 1952, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  S Coren,et al.  OCULAR DOMINANCE AND AMBLYOPIA* , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  W. R. Vinten MYOPIA IN CHILDREN , 1953 .

[9]  B. Curtin The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management , 1985 .

[10]  D R Weakley,et al.  The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[11]  S. Coren,et al.  The dominant eye. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  R. Held,et al.  Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  K Ohtsuka,et al.  Dynamic asymmetries in convergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. , 2001, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Laidlaw,et al.  Disease laterality, eye dominance, and visual handicap in patients with unilateral full thickness macular holes , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  S. Jain,et al.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. , 1996, Survey of ophthalmology.

[16]  S Coren,et al.  PATTERNS OF OCULAR DOMINANCE* , 1973, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  K. Ibi,et al.  Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes. , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  D. Goss,et al.  Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization , 1995, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[19]  Lynn Marran,et al.  Lens induced aniso-accommodation , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  P. Dunlop Development of dominance in the central binocular field , 1992 .

[21]  White Ge,et al.  Mandibular position and head posture as a function of eye dominance. , 1996 .

[22]  W. Miles Ocular dominance in human adults. , 1930 .

[23]  K. Schmid,et al.  The autonomic control of accommodation and implications for human myopia development: a review , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  M. Kapadia,et al.  Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  Walter H. Fink,et al.  THE DOMINANT EYE: ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE , 1938 .