Online Social Network Sites and the Concept of Social Capital

1. Introduction During the past decade usage of online social network sites has grown dramatically, now rivaling search engines as the most visited Internet sites (Experian Hitwise, 2010). With the rise of such mega‐sites as Facebook, which by itself now boasts more than 400 million active users around the world (Facebook Press Room, 2010), online social network use has become a fixture in the lives of a large proportion of the world's 1.8 billion Internet users (Internet World Stats, 2010). Growing evidence from analyses of online social network site use suggests that these sites have become important tools for managing relationships with a large and often heterogeneous network of people who provide social support and serve as conduits for useful information and other resources (boyd & Ellison, 2007; Ellison et al., 2007). Such SNS benefits are derived from social relationships and have been broadly conceptualized as social capital outcomes of SNS use (Ellison et al., 2007). Beyond identifying benefits, new research explores the factors that lead to improved outcomes for SNS users (Burke et al., 2010; Ellison et al, 2010). Given the pervasive use of social network sites (SNSs), there is a need for a careful assessment of the ways in which users incorporate these tools into their daily lives and obtain benefits from use. The goals of the paper are therefore to review the broad themes from this body of work, and to examine the underlying mechanisms through which social capital benefits are generated. By exposing such mechanisms, we will be better prepared to educate future users about usage strategies, as well as aid designers who are adding social features to many new forms of online media. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. First, social network sites are briefly introduced and defined, so as to differentiate them from other forms of online communities. The paper then introduces the notion of social capital and summarizes key findings from research exploring the linkages between social capital and the Internet. We then review the literature investigating the social capital implications of online social network sites. As part of this review, we explore the underlying mechanisms that can explain how social network sites contribute to social capital formation. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.

[1]  Alice E. Marwick 'I’m a Lot More Interesting than a Friendster Profile': Identity Presentation, Authenticity and Power in Social Networking Services , 2005 .

[2]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[3]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[5]  N. Nie Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .

[6]  Steven L. Puller,et al.  The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social Network Formation on University Campuses , 2008 .

[7]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[10]  N. Ellison,et al.  Connection Strategies: Relationship Formation and Maintenance on Social Network Sites , 2009 .

[11]  David R. Millen,et al.  Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook , 2007, GROUP.

[12]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[14]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[15]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[16]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[17]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[18]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[20]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[21]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[22]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[24]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[27]  Jaz Hee-jeong Choi,et al.  Living in Cyworld: Contextualising Cy-Ties in South Korea , 2006 .

[28]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[30]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.

[31]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[32]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  The effects of teacher self‐disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility , 2009 .

[33]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[35]  M. Huysman,et al.  How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital , 2004 .

[36]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace , 2007 .

[37]  M. Huysman,et al.  Social Capital and Information Technology , 2004 .

[38]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[39]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[41]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  Social capital and the net , 2000, CACM.

[42]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[44]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace , 2007, AMCIS.

[45]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  With a Little Help From My Friends: How Social Network Sites Affect Social Capital Processes , 2010 .

[46]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Understanding Development and Usage of Social Networking Sites: The Social Software Performance Model , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[47]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[48]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  Analysing Social Networks Via the Internet , 2007 .