Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context

In 1999 Shah1 and others said that the Royal College of General Practitioners should advocate longer consultations in general practice as a matter of policy. The college set up a working group chaired by A P Hungin, and a systematic review of literature on consultation length in general practice was commissioned. The working group agreed that the available evidence would be hard to interpret without discussion of the changing context within which consultations now take place. For many years general practitioners and those who have surveyed patients' opinions in the United Kingdom have complained about short consultation time, despite a steady increase in actual mean length. Recently Mechanic pointed out that this is also true in the United States.2 Is there any justification for a further increase in mean time allocated per consultation in general practice? We report on the outcome of extensive debate among a group of general practitioners with an interest in the process of care, with reference to the interim findings of the commissioned systematic review and our personal databases. The review identified 14 relevant papers. #### Summary points Longer consultations are associated with a range of better patient outcomes Modern consultations in general practice deal with patients with more serious and chronic conditions Increasing patient participation means more complex interaction, which demands extra time Difficulties with access and with loss of continuity add to perceived stress and poor performance and lead to further pressure on time Longer consultations should be a professional priority, combined with increased use of technology and more flexible practice management to maximise interpersonal continuity Research on implementation is needed The systematic review consistently showed that doctors with longer consultation times prescribe less and offer more advice on lifestyle and other health promoting activities. Longer consultations have been significantly associated with better recognition and …

[1]  W. Silverman A New Kind of Doctor: The General Practitioner's Part in the Health of the Community (review) , 2015 .

[2]  D. Mechanic How should hamsters run? Some observations about sufficient patient time in primary care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Richard Smith,et al.  Hamster health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  R. Lloyd‐Mostyn National service framework for coronary heart disease , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  B. Starfield,et al.  Fix what's wrong, not what's right, with general practice in Britain , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  G. Freeman,et al.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey , 1999, BMJ.

[7]  R. Neal,et al.  Time for a change? The process of lengthening booking intervals in general practice. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  J. Hart Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared? , 1998, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[9]  G. Freeman,et al.  What future for continuity of care in general practice? , 1997, BMJ.

[10]  C. McLaughlin,et al.  Continuous quality improvement for continuity of care. , 1993, The Journal of family practice.

[11]  A. Porter,et al.  Attitudes to medical care, the organization of work, and stress among general practitioners. , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  C. Borchgrevink,et al.  Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations. , 1991, BMJ.

[13]  R. Chambers Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal. , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  A. Wilson,et al.  Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal. , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  A. Porter,et al.  Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice. , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  J. Swales A New Kind of Doctor: The General Practitioner's Part in the Health of the Community , 1989, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[17]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease , 1989, Medical care.

[18]  S. Arber,et al.  Do appointment systems work? , 1982, British medical journal.

[19]  N. Stott,et al.  The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. , 1979, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[20]  M. Balint The doctor, his patient and the illness , 1957 .

[21]  London,et al.  General Medical Council , 1920 .

[22]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Report of a Scoping Exercise for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) , 2001 .

[23]  David Tuckett,et al.  Meetings Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations , 1986 .