Invasive Species Management: Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the U.S. Beef Industry

A conceptual bioeconomic framework that integrates dynamic epidemiological-economic processes was designed to analyze the effects of invasive species introduction on decision making in a livestock sector (e.g., production and feeding). The framework integrates an epidemiological model, a dynamic livestock production model, domestic consumption, and international trade. The integrated approach captures producer and consumer responses and welfare outcomes of livestock disease outbreaks, as well as alternative invasive species management policies. Scenarios of foot-and-mouth disease are simulated to demonstrate the usefulness of the framework in facilitating invasive species policy design.

[1]  David M. Aadland Cattle cycles, heterogeneous expectations and the age distribution of capital , 2004 .

[2]  Aalt A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  A dynamic model for cost-benefit analyses of foot-and-mouth disease control strategies , 1992 .

[3]  R. S. Swingle,et al.  Nutrient requirements of beef cattle , 1986 .

[4]  DISCOSEM: An Integrated Epidemiological-Economic Analysis of Foot and Mouth Disease in the Southern Cone , 2004 .

[5]  R. Huffaker,et al.  Optimal Control of Vector‐Virus‐Plant Interactions: The Case of Potato Leafroll Virus Net Necrosis , 2000 .

[6]  O. Mahul,et al.  Simulated economic consequences of foot-and-mouth disease epidemics and their public control in France. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Cattle Cycles , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Brian K. Coffey,et al.  The economic impact of BSE on the U.S. beef industry: product value losses, regulatorycosts, and consumer reactions , 2005 .

[9]  L. Jarvis Cattle as Capital Goods and Ranchers as Portfolio Managers: An Application to the Argentine Cattle Sector , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  M. Schoenbaum,et al.  Modeling alternative mitigation strategies for a hypothetical outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the United States. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  J. Ekboir,et al.  Evaluating the Potential Impact of a Foot‐and‐Mouth Disease Outbreak , 2008 .

[12]  D. Fox,et al.  Adjusting Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle for Animal and Environmental Variations , 1988 .

[13]  R. Kemp,et al.  A bioeconomic model for comparing beef cattle genotypes at their optimal economic slaughter end point. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[14]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  Solving Empirical Bioeconomic Models: A Rangeland Management Application , 1992 .

[15]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[16]  An evaluation of alternate control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease in Australia: a regional approach , 1995 .

[17]  J. R. Black,et al.  A system for Predicting Body Composition and Performance of Growing Cattle , 1984 .