Automated measurement of lying behavior for monitoring the comfort and welfare of lactating dairy cows

Abstract Behavioral monitoring may be useful to assess the welfare, state of health and comfort of farm animals. Lying behavior is often used as an indication of well-being in cattle and for evaluating the stall quality. The use of electronic data loggers to automate behavioral recording has become increasingly common. We tested the use of the Pedometer Plus tag (S.A.E. Afikim, Israel) for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle (n=18 lactating cows). Behavior was recorded for 11 days with the Pedometer Plus tag, from which the rest bout, bout duration and rest time were calculated. The lying behavior was simultaneously recorded using a HOBO Pendant G logger as a reference system to validate the Pedometer Plus tag. A linear regression analysis between the measurement methods showed that the recorded lying time (R2≥0.948) and the recorded number of lying bouts (R2≥0.718) were closely related, which was also confirmed by the comparison of the means (lying time, P=0.60; lying bouts, P=0.72). Despite the positive relationship, in some days, slope and intercept were statistically different from 1 and 0, respectively. The recordings of lying time and the number of lying bouts between the devices, for some cows, differed by more than 5%. The Pedometer Plus tag overestimates the number of lying bouts and underestimates the time that cows spend lying down with respect to HOBO pendant G logger recording. The different sampling, editing and filtering methods between devices may contribute to these discrepancies. This system will be advantageous for the reliable, 24 h/d automated recording of individual animals in a herd. This system reduces the difficulty of performing continuous measurements of behavior for a large number of animals over a prolonged period of time. In summary, the Pedometer Plus tag is likely a useful tool for the measurement of lying behavior in dairy cows.

[1]  Lars Schrader,et al.  A new method to measure behavioural activity levels in dairy cows , 2003 .

[2]  D. Broom,et al.  The relationships between social behaviour of dairy cows and the occurrence of lameness in three herds. , 2000, Research in veterinary science.

[3]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems , 2001 .

[4]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  Dafydd Gibbon,et al.  1 User’s guide , 1998 .

[6]  D. Weary,et al.  Free-stall dimensions: effects on preference and stall usage. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  David G. Renter,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle , 2009 .

[8]  D. Weary,et al.  Brisket boards reduce freestall use. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  M. V. Keyserlingk,et al.  Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  N. Cook,et al.  Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Rushen,et al.  Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing , 2000 .

[13]  R. W. Palmer,et al.  Factors affecting stall use for different freestall bases. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Jago,et al.  Validation of a technology for objectively measuring behaviour in dairy cows and its application for oestrous detection , 2007 .

[15]  L. Boyle,et al.  A brief note on the validation of a system for recording lying behaviour in dairy cows , 2008 .

[16]  C. Nogareda,et al.  Climate factors affecting conception rate of high producing dairy cows in northeastern Spain. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[17]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  T. Mader,et al.  Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds , 2006 .

[19]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Effect of rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the time budgets of dairy cattle. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior: assessing within- and between-herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Abby E. Barberg,et al.  Behavior of Dairy Cows in an Alternative Bedded-Pack Housing System , 2008 .

[22]  J. Rushen,et al.  Correlated changes in behavioral indicators of lameness in dairy cows following hoof trimming. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  N. Cook,et al.  The effect of heat stress and lameness on time budgets of lactating dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  W M Sischo,et al.  Using time-lapse video photography to assess dairy cattle lying behavior in a free-stall barn. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Designing the Optimal Robotic Milking Barn, Part 1: Quantifying Facility Usage , 2000 .

[26]  C. Winckler,et al.  Evaluation of data loggers, sampling intervals, and editing techniques for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of Dairy Science.

[27]  R. Hauser,et al.  Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[28]  D T Galligan,et al.  Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  Matthew J. Darr,et al.  Application note: Embedded sensor technology for real time determination of animal lying time , 2009 .