Sound source perception in anuran amphibians

Sound source perception refers to the auditory system's ability to parse incoming sensory information into coherent representations of distinct sound sources in the environment. Such abilities are no doubt key to successful communication in many taxa, but we know little about their function in animal communication systems. For anuran amphibians (frogs and toads), social and reproductive behaviors depend on a listener's ability to hear and identify sound signals amid high levels of background noise in acoustically cluttered environments. Recent neuroethological studies are revealing how frogs parse these complex acoustic scenes to identify individual calls in noisy breeding choruses. Current evidence highlights some interesting similarities and differences in how the auditory systems of frogs and other vertebrates (most notably birds and mammals) perform auditory scene analysis.

[1]  G. Rose,et al.  Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Josh H. McDermott The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[3]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[4]  A S Feng,et al.  Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Shamma,et al.  Behind the scenes of auditory perception , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Finding Your Mate at a Cocktail Party: Frequency Separation Promotes Auditory Stream Segregation of Concurrent Voices in Multi-Species Frog Choruses , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Andrew J King,et al.  Auditory Neuroscience: Filling in the Gaps , 2007, Current Biology.

[8]  Alejandro Vélez,et al.  Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  R. Fay,et al.  Forward masking and suppression in the midbrain of the southern grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  A. Simmons,et al.  Perception of mistuned harmonics in complex sounds by the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  Albert S Feng,et al.  GABA Is Involved in Spatial Unmasking in the Frog Auditory Midbrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Ryan,et al.  The Effects of Spatially Separated Call Components on Phonotaxis in Túngara Frogs: Evidence for Auditory Grouping , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[13]  R. Carlyon How the brain separates sounds , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. A. Bee,et al.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  Anthony Arak,et al.  Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses , 1983, Nature.

[16]  A. Popper,et al.  The Evolutionary biology of hearing , 1992 .

[17]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) do not selectively respond to signals with a harmonic structure in noise , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  J. Bird Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. , 1997 .

[20]  Franz Huber,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[21]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  D. Bodnar The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa) , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Evolution of a sensory novelty: Tympanic ears and the associated neural processing , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[25]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Joshua J. Schwartz,et al.  Directionality of the Auditory System and Call Pattern Recognition During Acoustic Interference in the Gray Tree Frog , 1995 .

[27]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: perceptual restoration or sensory bias? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Stimulus Familiarity Affects Perceptual Restoration in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  R. Fay Sound Source Perception and Stream Segregation in NonhumanVertebrate Animals , 2008 .

[30]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Anuran Acoustic Signal Production in Noisy Environments , 2013 .

[31]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[32]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Effects of masking noise on evoked calling in the Puerto Rican coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[33]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  M. Ryan,et al.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs. , 2011, Nature communications.

[35]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .

[36]  K. O’Connor,et al.  Illusory Sound Perception in Macaque Monkeys , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  A neural and behavioral study of auditory habituation in the bullfrog,Rana catesbeiana , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[39]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.

[40]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  R. Fay,et al.  Auditory perception of sound sources , 2007 .

[43]  A. Simmons Selectivity for harmonic structure in complex sounds by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  J. Schwartz,et al.  TESTS FOR CALL RESTORATION IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA VERSICOLOR , 2011 .

[46]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs , 2012, Hearing Research.

[47]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians , 2010 .

[49]  Stewart H. Hulse,et al.  Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .

[50]  Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al.  On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Spatial Hearing and Perceiving Sources , 2008 .

[52]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  A. Simmons,et al.  Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.