Conceptualizing energy services: A review of energy and well-being along the Energy Service Cascade

[1]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Measuring energy poverty: Focusing on what matters , 2012 .

[2]  Jamie E. L. Spinney,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship between Socioeconomic and Well‐Being Variables and Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2013 .

[3]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Seven Centuries of Energy Services: The Price and Use of Light in the United Kingdom (1300-2000)1 , 2006 .

[4]  Daniel B. Müller,et al.  The Role of In-Use Stocks in the Social Metabolism and in Climate Change Mitigation , 2013 .

[5]  Zhao Liu,et al.  The direct and indirect CO2 rebound effect for private cars in China , 2017 .

[6]  Xin Gao,et al.  Empirical Study on Annual Energy-Saving Performance of Energy Performance Contracting in China , 2018 .

[7]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[8]  Charles A. S. Hall,et al.  Energy, EROI and quality of life , 2014 .

[9]  Luis Gabriel Carmona,et al.  Material Services with Both Eyes Wide Open , 2017 .

[10]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Industrial Ecology: The role of manufactured capital in sustainability , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Sebastian Groh,et al.  A critical review of modern approaches for multidimensional energy poverty measurement , 2018 .

[12]  R. Fouquet.  Long-Run Demand for Energy Services: Income and Price Elasticities over Two Hundred Years , 2014, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[13]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998 , 2003 .

[14]  Edward Vine,et al.  Energy service companies in European countries: Current status and a strategy to foster their development , 2006 .

[15]  E. Corbera,et al.  Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[16]  T. Foxon,et al.  Divergence of trends in US and UK aggregate exergy efficiencies 1960-2010. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Lenneke Kuijer,et al.  ‘That’s when we started using the living room’: Lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[18]  H. Saunders.  Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services , 2000 .

[19]  Manfred A. Max-Neef.  Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections , 1989 .

[20]  R. Cummins,et al.  Happiness versus the Environment—A Case Study of Australian Lifestyles , 2013 .

[21]  Michael F Blackhurst,et al.  Energy savings and the rebound effect with multiple energy services and efficiency correlation , 2014 .

[22]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow , 2016 .

[23]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Accounting for growth: the role of physical work , 2005 .

[24]  Yue‐Jun Zhang,et al.  Energy rebound effect in China's Industry: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis , 2017 .

[25]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Measuring energy rebound effect in the Chinese economy: An economic accounting approach , 2015 .

[26]  Ronan Bolton,et al.  UK Local Authority engagement with the Energy Service Company (ESCo) model: Key characteristics, benefits, limitations and considerations , 2015 .

[27]  K. Gillingham,et al.  The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy , 2015, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[28]  Stefan Bouzarovski,et al.  Rethinking the measurement of energy poverty in Europe: A critical analysis of indicators and data , 2017, Indoor + built environment : the journal of the International Society of the Built Environment.

[29]  Jouni K. Juntunen,et al.  Energy intensive lifestyles: time use, the activity patterns of consumers, and related energy demands in Finland , 2015 .

[30]  R. Howarth.  ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH , 1997 .

[31]  Bertoldi Paolo,et al.  Energy Service Companies in Europe - Status Report 2005 , 2005 .

[32]  I. Staveren.  Capabilities and Well-being , 2008 .

[33]  Julia K. Steinberger,et al.  Human well‐being and climate change mitigation , 2017 .

[34]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Three dimensional energy profile , 2011 .

[35]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Energy requirements of consumption: Urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications , 2013 .

[36]  Eva Samakovlis,et al.  The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries–A general equilibrium analysis , 2015 .

[37]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[38]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  A socio‐metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation , 2011 .

[39]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[40]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[41]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[42]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Transitions in pathways of human development and carbon emissions , 2013 .

[43]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Regional and global exergy and energy efficiencies , 1996 .

[44]  S. Menzel,et al.  Ecosystem Services as a Stakeholder‐Driven Concept for Conservation Science , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[45]  Franz Wirl,et al.  Interdependencies between transport fuel demand, efficiency and quality: An application to Austria , 2012 .

[46]  K. Kaygusuz.  Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries , 2012 .

[47]  A. Tukker,et al.  Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions , 2016 .

[48]  Ana Paula Bezerra Barquet,et al.  Business Model Elements for Product-Service System , 2011 .

[49]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Connecting global emissions to fundamental human needs and their satisfaction , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[50]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure , 2008, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[51]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach , 2012 .

[52]  Milin Lu,et al.  Measurement of energy rebound effect in households: Evidence from residential electricity consumption in Beijing, China , 2016 .

[53]  B. Boardman,et al.  Global Energy Assessment (GEA): Energy, Poverty, and Development , 2012 .

[54]  S. Meyer,et al.  Capturing the multifaceted nature of energy poverty: Lessons from Belgium , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[55]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[56]  Hans Auer,et al.  The impact of consumer behavior on residential energy demand for space heating , 1998 .

[57]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Technological progress and energy rebound effect in China׳s textile industry: Evidence and policy implications , 2016 .

[58]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances , 1980 .

[59]  Eleanor C. Stokes,et al.  Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications , 2016 .

[60]  K. Gillingham,et al.  The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications , 2015, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[61]  Daniel Spreng,et al.  Energy use and energy access in relation to poverty , 2003 .

[62]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Energy at your service: highlighting energy usage systems in the context of energy efficiency analysis , 2011 .

[63]  Boğaziçi.  Analysis of ESCO Activities Using Country Indicators , 2019 .

[64]  Jaume Freire-González,et al.  Evidence of direct and indirect rebound effect in households in EU-27 countries , 2017 .

[65]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices , 2010 .

[66]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[67]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service , 2010 .

[68]  S. Sorrell.  The economics of energy service contracts , 2007 .

[69]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework , 2017, Ecological indicators.

[70]  E. van de Fliert,et al.  Defection, recruitment and social change in cooking practices: Energy poverty through a social practice lens , 2017 .

[71]  Helga Weisz,et al.  SOCIETY AS HYBRID BETWEEN MATERIAL AND SYMBOLIC REALMS : TOWARD A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF SOCIETY-NATURE INTERACTION , 2006 .

[72]  Chris J. Martin,et al.  Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation , 2015 .

[73]  K. Kaygusuz.  Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development , 2011 .

[74]  H. Joosten,et al.  Ecosystem services and ethics , 2013 .

[75]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding how access shapes the transformation of ecosystem services to human well-being with an example from Costa Rica , 2017 .

[76]  Jonathan M Cullen,et al.  Reducing energy demand: what are the practical limits? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[77]  L. Schipper,et al.  Residential energy demand in OECD-countries and the role of irreversible efficiency improvements , 1998 .

[78]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement , 2012 .

[79]  Nina Eisenmenger,et al.  Trends in Austrian Resource Efficiency: An Exergy and Useful Work Analysis in Comparison to Material Use, CO2 Emissions, and Land Use , 2016, Journal of industrial ecology.

[80]  Narasimha D. Rao,et al.  Decent Living Standards: Material Prerequisites for Human Wellbeing , 2017, Social Indicators Research.

[81]  G. Weisenborn.  United Nations Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .

[82]  Houcai Shen,et al.  The choice of energy saving modes for an energy-intensive manufacturer considering non-energy benefits , 2017 .

[83]  S. Moshiri,et al.  Rebound effect of efficiency improvement in passenger cars on gasoline consumption in Canada , 2017 .

[84]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  The Long Run Demand for Lighting:Elasticities and Rebound Effects in Different Phases of Economic Development , 2012 .

[85]  D. O'Rourke,et al.  Transforming Consumption: From Decoupling, to Behavior Change, to System Changes for Sustainable Consumption , 2015 .

[86]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy , 2014 .

[87]  Franz Wirl,et al.  Irreversible Price-Induced Efficiency Improvements: Theory and Empirical Application to Road Transportation , 1993 .

[88]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Towards sustainability of energy systems: A primer on how to apply the concept of energy services to identify necessary trends and policies , 2008 .

[89]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[90]  H. Haberl,et al.  Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target , 2018 .

[91]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  The WITCH Model: Structure, Baseline, Solutions , 2007 .

[92]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies , 2015 .

[93]  Rigoberto García Ochoa,et al.  Privation of energy services in Mexican households: An alternative measure of energy poverty , 2016 .

[94]  Benjamin Sovacool.  Conceptualizing urban household energy use: Climbing the “Energy Services Ladder” , 2011 .

[95]  Benjamin Sovacool.  Energy, poverty, and development , 2014 .

[96]  David L. Ryan,et al.  Economic modelling of energy services: Rectifying misspecified energy demand functions , 2015 .

[97]  S. Sorrell.  The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[98]  M. Nussbaum.  CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE , 2003 .

[99]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Terry Barker,et al.  The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy , 2009 .

[101]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  AIM/CGE V2.0: Basic Feature of the Model , 2017 .

[102]  J. Clancy,et al.  Enabling urban poor livelihoods policy making: understanding the role of energy services. Inception Report. , 2004 .

[103]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Material Stock–Flow–Service Nexus: A New Approach for Tackling the Decoupling Conundrum , 2017 .

[104]  H. Wang,et al.  Direct rebound effect for passenger transport: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong , 2012 .

[105]  Ke Li,et al.  The energy rebound effects across China’s industrial sectors: An output distance function approach , 2016 .

[106]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption , 2016 .

[107]  Giulio Mattioli,et al.  Transport needs in a climate-constrained world. A novel framework to reconcile social and environmental sustainability in transport , 2016 .

[108]  D. French,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals , 2021, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[109]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .

[110]  R. Fouquet.  Trends in income and price elasticities of transport demand (1850–2010) , 2012 .

[111]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade , 2012 .

[112]  Lee Stapleton,et al.  Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in , 2016 .

[113]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies , 2014 .

[114]  Jose Manuel Lopez-Guede,et al.  Decoupling between human development and energy consumption within footprint accounts , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[115]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Useful work and information as drivers of economic growth , 2012 .

[116]  Peter H. Larsen,et al.  A method to estimate the size and remaining market potential of the U.S. ESCO (energy service company) industry , 2014 .

[117]  S. Sorrell.  The contribution of energy service contracting to a low carbon economy , 2005 .

[118]  Julia K. Steinberger,et al.  A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use , 2017 .

[119]  R. Gillard,et al.  Fuel poverty from the bottom-up: Characterising household energy vulnerability through the lived experience of the fuel poor , 2015 .

[120]  E. Voet,et al.  How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach , 2016 .

[121]  R. Ayres,et al.  Structure and dynamics of useful work along the agriculture-industry-services transition: Portugal from 1856 to 2009 , 2016 .

[122]  J. Roberts,et al.  From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005 , 2010 .

[123]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Decomposition of useful work intensity: The EU (European Union)-15 countries from 1960 to 2009 , 2014 .

[124]  T. Sousa,et al.  Useful Exergy Is Key in Obtaining Plausible Aggregate Production Functions and Recognizing the Role of Energy in Economic Growth: Portugal 1960–2009 , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[125]  Göran Englund,et al.  Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect : Evidence from USA and six European countries 1960-2002 , 2009 .

[126]  Michael J. Fell.  Energy Services: A conceptual review , 2017 .

[127]  E. Hertwich.  Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective , 2005 .

[128]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy - A review , 2015 .

[129]  Charles Goldman,et al.  Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data , 2003 .

[130]  Jaume Freire-González.  A new way to estimate the direct and indirect rebound effect and other rebound indicators , 2017 .

[131]  Yuwan Malakar,et al.  Structure, agency and capabilities: Conceptualising inertia in solid fuel-based cooking practices , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[132]  K. Jax,et al.  Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade , 2017, Ecosystem services.

[133]  Qianli Deng,et al.  Strategic design of cost savings guarantee in energy performance contracting under uncertainty , 2015 .

[134]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  The effectiveness of energy service demand reduction: A scenario analysis of global climate change mitigation , 2014 .

[135]  Satu Pätäri,et al.  Energy Service Companies and Energy Performance Contracting: is there a need to renew the business model? Insights from a Delphi study , 2014 .

[136]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[137]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups , 2014 .

[138]  R. Fouquet.  Long Run Trends in the Price of Energy and Energy Services , 2011 .

[139]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Energy service satisfaction in two Mexican communities: A study on demographic, household, equipment and energy related predictors , 2014 .

[140]  R. Day,et al.  Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework , 2016 .

[141]  Rajesh H. Acharya,et al.  Assessing the extent and intensity of energy poverty using Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index: Empirical evidence from households in India , 2017 .

[142]  Stefan Bouzarovski,et al.  A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary , 2015 .

[143]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .