Comparing the attractor strength of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination using cross-recurrence analysis

Previous research has demonstrated that intra- and interpersonal rhythmic interlimb coordination are both constrained by the self-organizing entrainment process of coupled oscillators. Despite intra- and interpersonal coordination exhibiting the same stable macroscopic movement patterns the variability of the coordination is typically found to be much greater for inter- compared to intrapersonal coordination. Researchers have assumed that this is due to the interpersonal visual-motor coupling producing a weaker attractor dynamic than the intrapersonal neuromuscular coupling. To determine whether this assumption is true, two experiments were conducted in which pairs of participants coordinated hand-held pendulums swung about the wrist, either intra- and interpersonally. Using the cross-recurrence statistics of percent recurrence and maxline to independently index the level of noise and the attractor strength of the coordination, respectively, the results confirmed that the attractor strength was significantly weaker for inter- compared to intrapersonal coordination and that a similar magnitude of noise underlies both.

[1]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[2]  M. Turvey,et al.  Encoding and retrieval during bimanual rhythmic coordination. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , 2004 .

[4]  Mehmet Emre Çek,et al.  Analysis of observed chaotic data , 2004 .

[5]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Concurrent Cognitive Task Modulates Coordination Dynamics , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Kazutoshi Kudo,et al.  Environmental coupling modulates the attractors of rhythmic coordination. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Synergies in intra- and interpersonal interlimb rhythmic coordination. , 2007, Motor control.

[8]  J. Kelso,et al.  Action-Perception as a Pattern Formation Process , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[9]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Synergetics: An Introduction , 1983 .

[10]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Distinguishing the noise and attractor strength of coordinated limb movements using recurrence analysis , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  H. Haken,et al.  A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Long-term consistencies in assembling coordinated rhythmic movements ☆ , 1992 .

[14]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy environments using cross-recurrence quantification , 1998 .

[15]  N. Marwan Encounters with neighbours : current developments of concepts based on recurrence plots and their applications , 2003 .

[16]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Charles L. Webber,et al.  Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators , 2002 .

[18]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[19]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Influence of observational noise on the recurrence quantification analysis , 2002 .

[20]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[21]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  R. Schmidt,et al.  A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.