A general sampling formula for community structure data

The development of neutral community theory has shown that the assumption of species neutrality, although implausible on the level of individual species, can lead to reasonable predictions on the community level. While Hubbell's neutral model and several of its variants have been analysed in quite some detail, the comparison of theoretical predictions with empirical abundance data is often hindered by technical problems. Only for a few models the exact solution of the stationary abundance distribution is known and sufficiently simple to be applied to data. For other models, approximate solutions have been proposed, but their accuracy is questionable. Here, we argue that many of these technical problems can be overcome by replacing the assumption of constant community size (the zero‐sum constraint) by the assumption of independent species abundances. We present a general sampling formula for community abundance data under this assumption. We show that for the few models for which an exact solution with zero‐sum constraint is known, our independent species approach leads to very similar parameter estimates as the zero‐sum models, for six frequently studied tropical forest community samples. We show that our general sampling formula can be easily confronted to a much wider range of datasets (very large datasets, relative abundance data, presence‐absence data, and sets of multiple samples) for a large class of models, including non‐neutral ones. We provide an R package, called SADISA (Species Abundance Distributions under the Independent Species Assumption), to facilitate the use of the sampling formula.

[1]  M. Robb,et al.  Ideas and perspectives , 2019, Men, Masculinities and the Care of Children.

[2]  D. Bellwood,et al.  A unified model explains commonness and rarity on coral reefs. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[3]  Thijs Janzen,et al.  A sampling formula for ecological communities with multiple dispersal syndromes. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  R. Kadmon,et al.  A neutral theory with environmental stochasticity explains static and dynamic properties of ecological communities. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[5]  Amaury Lambert,et al.  Phylogenies support out-of-equilibrium models of biodiversity. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[6]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  David Alonso,et al.  When Can Species Abundance Data Reveal Non-neutrality? , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Ian Holmes,et al.  Linking Statistical and Ecological Theory: Hubbell's Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity as a Hierarchical Dirichlet Process , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  B. Haegeman,et al.  Independent species in independent niches behave neutrally , 2011 .

[10]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Franck Jabot,et al.  Analyzing Tropical Forest Tree Species Abundance Distributions Using a Nonneutral Model and through Approximate Bayesian Inference , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Shurong Zhou,et al.  Negative density dependence can offset the effect of species competitive asymmetry: a niche-based mechanism for neutral-like patterns. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  The neutral theory of biodiversity with random fission speciation , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[14]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[15]  Ryan A Chisholm,et al.  Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[17]  B. Haegeman,et al.  Self-consistent approach for neutral community models with speciation. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  James P O'Dwyer,et al.  Field theory for biogeography: a spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity , 2010, Ecology letters.

[19]  Omri Allouche,et al.  A general framework for neutral models of community dynamics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[20]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Improved estimation of neutral model parameters for multiple samples with different degrees of dispersal limitation. , 2009, Ecology.

[21]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Joshua B Plotkin,et al.  A statistical theory for sampling species abundances. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[24]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[26]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Estimating parameters of neutral communities: from one single large to several small samples. , 2007, Ecology.

[27]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an 'exact' test of neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[28]  Steven C Walker,et al.  When and why do non-neutral metacommunities appear neutral? , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[29]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2007 .

[30]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Comment on "Neutral Ecological Theory Reveals Isolation and Rapid Speciation in a Biodiversity Hot Spot" , 2006, Science.

[31]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests , 2005, Nature.

[32]  R. Etienne,et al.  A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[33]  M. Steele,et al.  Small-scale field experiments accurately scale up to predict density dependence in reef fish populations at large scales. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Pacala,et al.  Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process , 2005 .

[35]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity , 2005 .

[36]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[37]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[38]  R. Macarthur ON THE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF BIRD SPECIES. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  F. W. Preston The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[40]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[41]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  A nearly neutral model of biodiversity. , 2008, Ecology.