Optimal Control of Automotive Multivariable Dynamical Systems

Two distinctive features of challenging control engineering problems are commonly taken into consideration in design of dynamical, mechatronics systems, namely operation ranges, of such systems with nonlinear effects, which are not always near to equilibrium states, as well as a fairly high level of uncertainties of their physical description with which controllers have to cope despite a lack of knowledge on the all system parameters although physical modeling allows to identify their particular nonlinear effects. It should be noted that usage of nonlinear physical modeling in real-time control systems can be computationally very demanding. Hence, it seems to be suitable to use robust control methods based on linearized models with adaptive updating algorithms. However, usually strong nonlinearities can reduce the effectiveness of control methods, and thus of adaptive control algorithms. The controller gains can be often updated by using the estimated parameters. In this contribution the adaptive control systems for automotive applications, which are based on indirect (or self-tuning) controller strategies are discussed. The modeling issue of indirect optimal controller strategies is illustrated by the application example.

[1]  Pablo Moscato,et al.  Handbook of Memetic Algorithms , 2011, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[2]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Automotive Model Predictive Control , 2010 .

[3]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[4]  Uwe Kiencke,et al.  Automotive Control Systems , 2005 .

[5]  Milan Sága,et al.  Memetic Algorithm with Normalized RBF ANN for Approximation of Objective Function and Secondary RBF ANN for Error Mapping , 2017 .

[6]  L. S. Pontryagin,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes , 1962 .

[7]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  The Electrical Engineering Handbook , 1993 .

[8]  Javier García-Heras,et al.  A Comparison of Optimal Control Methods for Minimum Fuel Cruise at Constant Altitude and Course with Fixed Arrival Time , 2014 .

[9]  J. Jackiewicz,et al.  Manufacturing of instructional aids for students at low cost by means of 3D printing , 2017 .

[10]  Henry J. Kelley,et al.  Gradient Theory of Optimal Flight Paths , 1960 .

[11]  Hong Chen,et al.  Automotive Control: the State of the Art and Perspective: Automotive Control: the State of the Art and Perspective , 2014 .

[12]  A. Sideris,et al.  A multilayered neural network controller , 1988, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[13]  U. Ascher,et al.  A collocation solver for mixed order systems of boundary value problems , 1979 .

[14]  Hong Chen,et al.  Automotive Control: the State of the Art and Perspective , 2013 .

[15]  Norman S. Nise,et al.  Control Systems Engineering , 1991 .

[16]  J. Stoer,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1962, Universum:Technical sciences.

[18]  Howard Kaufman,et al.  Direct adaptive control algorithms: theory and applications , 1993, Choice Reviews Online.

[19]  John F. Gardner,et al.  Dynamic Modeling and Control of Engineering Systems , 2007 .

[20]  T. Barth,et al.  Efficient massively parallel Euler solver for two-dimensional unstructured grids , 1992 .

[21]  I. D. Landau,et al.  Digital Control Systems: Design, Identification and Implementation , 2006 .

[22]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Modelling, Identification and Control , 2002 .