Articulatory gestures as phonological units

We have argued that dynamically defined articulatory gestures are the appropriate units to serve as the atoms of phonological representation. Gestures are a natural unit, not only because they involve task-oriented movements of the articulators, but because they arguably emerge as prelinguistic discrete units of action in infants. The use of gestures, rather than constellations of gestures as in Root nodes, as basic units of description makes it possible to characterise a variety of language patterns in which gestural organisation varies. Such patterns range from the misorderings of disordered speech through phonological rules involving gestural overlap and deletion to historical changes in which the overlap of gestures provides a crucial explanatory element. Gestures can participate in language patterns involving overlap because they are spatiotemporal in nature and therefore have internal duration. In addition, gestures differ from current theories of feature geometry by including the constriction degree as an inherent part of the gesture. Since the gestural constrictions occur in the vocal tract, which can be charactensed in terms of tube geometry, all the levels of the vocal tract will be constricted, leading to a constriction degree hierarchy. The values of the constriction degree at each higher level node in the hierarchy can be predicted on the basis of the percolation principles and tube geometry. In this way, the use of gestures as atoms can be reconciled with the use of Constriction degree at various levels in the vocal tract (or feature geometry) hierarchy. The phonological notation developed for the gestural approach might usefully be incorporated, in whole or in part, into other phonologies. Five components of the notation were discussed, all derived from the basic premise that gestures are the primitive phonological unit, organised into gestural scores. These components include (1) constriction degree as a subordinate of the articulator node and (2) stiffness (duration) as a subordinate of the articulator node. That is, both CD and duration are inherent to the gesture. The gestures are arranged in gestural scores using (3) articulatory tiers, with (4) the relevant geometry (articulatory, tube or feature) indicated to the left of the score and (5) structural information above the score, if desired. Association lines can also be used to indicate how the gestures are combined into phonological units. Thus, gestures can serve both as characterisations of articulatory movement data and as the atoms of phonological representation.

[1]  K. Harris,et al.  A Temporal Model of Speech Production , 1981, Phonetica.

[2]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Fundamental problems in phonetics , 1977 .

[3]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Task Dynamic Coordination of the Speech Articulators: A Preliminary Model , 1986 .

[4]  C. A. Ferguson,et al.  WORDS AND SOUNDS IN EARLY LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1975 .

[5]  C. Browman,et al.  Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology , 1988, Phonetica.

[6]  Morris Halle,et al.  On distinctive features and their articulatory implementation , 1983 .

[7]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Revision of the IPA: linguo-labials as a test case , 1987, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[8]  D K Oller,et al.  Similarity of babbling in Spanish- and English-learning babies , 1982, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  H. Heuer,et al.  Generation and modulation of action patterns , 1986 .

[10]  B. D. Boysson-Bardies,et al.  Acoustic Investigations of Cross-linguistic Variability in Babbling , 1986 .

[11]  John Laver,et al.  The Cognitive Representation of Speech , 1982 .

[12]  J. Ohala Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns , 1975 .

[13]  B. Lindblom Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[14]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals , 1983 .

[15]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  The Segmental Organization of Speech , 1983 .

[16]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  T. Schadeberg,et al.  Nasalization in UMbundu , 1982 .

[18]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[19]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Gestures and autosegments: comments on Browman and Goldstein's paper , 1990 .

[20]  B. de Boysson-Bardies,et al.  Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[21]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  Elements of General Phonetics , 1967 .

[22]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[23]  Emma Gregores,et al.  A description of colloquial Guaraní , 1967 .

[24]  H. Stephen Straight,et al.  The Acquisition of Maya Phonology , 1978 .

[25]  J. Kelso,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[26]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[27]  K. Harris,et al.  Patterns of interarticulator phasing and their relation to linguistic structure. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C. Browman,et al.  Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures , 1986 .

[29]  W. Labov Locating Language in Time and Space , 1980 .

[30]  John M. Anderson,et al.  Principles of Dependency Phonology , 1987 .

[31]  D. Kimbrough Oiler,et al.  Metaphonology and Infant Vocalizations , 1986 .

[32]  V. Y. Plotkin Systems of Ultimate Phonological Units , 1976 .

[33]  Marlys A. Macken,et al.  From Babbling to Speech: A Re-Assessment of the Continuity Issue , 1985 .

[34]  Esther Thelen,et al.  Rhythmical behavior in infancy: An ethological perspective. , 1981 .

[35]  Samuel Jay Keyser,et al.  CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable , 1988 .

[36]  Roger Lass,et al.  Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts , 1984 .

[37]  Robert C. Marshall,et al.  Selective impairment of phonation: A case study , 1988, Brain and Language.

[38]  G. Miller,et al.  The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach , 1966 .

[39]  Florien J. Koopmans-van Beinum,et al.  Early Stages in the Development of Speech Movements , 1986 .

[40]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[41]  Michael C. Mackey,et al.  From Clocks to Chaos , 1988 .

[42]  Linda Shockey,et al.  Phonetic and phonological properties of connected speech , 1973 .

[43]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[44]  A. C. Gimson,et al.  An introduction to the pronunciation of English , 1991 .

[45]  E. Saltzman,et al.  GEST: A computational model of speech production using dynamically defined articulatory gestures , 1986 .

[46]  J. McCarthy Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review , 1988 .

[47]  Wendy Linker WPP, No. 56: Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Labial Activity in Vowels: A Cross-linguistic Study , 1982 .

[48]  C. Fowler Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: cyclic production of vowels in monosyllabic stress feet. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  M. Studdert-Kennedy The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. , 1987 .

[50]  William Pagliuca,et al.  Prolegomena to a theory of articulatory evolution , 1982 .

[51]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  Lehrbuch der Phonetik , 1904 .

[52]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[53]  Gillian Brown,et al.  Listening to spoken English , 1977 .

[54]  J. Ohala,et al.  The Story of [w]: An Exercise in the Phonetic Explanation for Sound Patterns , 1977 .

[55]  D K Oller,et al.  The role of audition in infant babbling. , 1988, Child development.

[56]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic features and phonological features , 1973 .

[57]  Lyle Campbell,et al.  Phonological Features: Problems and Proposals. , 1974 .

[58]  J. Ohala The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[59]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  The Structure of phonological representations , 1982 .

[60]  J. Locke,et al.  Phonological acquisition and change , 1983 .

[61]  J. Locke,et al.  The Linguistic Significance of Babbling , 1986 .

[62]  J. Kelso,et al.  Articulatory synthesis from underlying dynamics , 1984 .

[63]  Höskuldur Thráisson,et al.  On the Phonology of Icelandic Prespiration , 1978, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[64]  O. Fujimura Temporal Organization of Articulatory Movements as a Multidimensional Phrasal Structure , 1981, Phonetica.

[65]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[66]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Language perception and production , 1987 .

[67]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Precursors of Early Speech , 1986 .

[68]  Osamu Fujimura Elementary Gestures and Temporal Organization — What Does an Articulatory Constraint Mean? , 1981 .

[69]  Michael Hammond,et al.  On deriving the well-formedness condition , 1988 .

[70]  Christian Abry,et al.  "Laws" for lips , 1986, Speech Commun..

[71]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[72]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing , 1980 .

[73]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Peter Ladefoged Hierarchical Features of the International Phonetic Alphabet , 1988 .

[75]  C. Fowler A Relationship between Coarticulation and Compensatory Shortening , 1981, Phonetica.

[76]  D. Ostry,et al.  Control of rate and duration of speech movements. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic linguistics : essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged , 1987 .

[78]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Task‐dynamic modeling of interarticulator coordination , 1987 .

[79]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[80]  P. Ladefoged WHAT ARE LINGUISTIC SOUNDS MADE OF , 1980 .

[81]  S. Anderson The Organization of Phonology , 1974 .

[82]  Elizabeth Caroline Sagey,et al.  The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology , 1986 .

[83]  J. Kelso,et al.  A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[84]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  WPP, No. 64: Some of the Sounds of the World's Languages , 1986 .

[85]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Phonologically motivated substitutions in a 20–22 month old's imitations of intervocalic alveolar stops , 1988 .

[86]  Sidney A J Wood,et al.  X-ray and model studies of vowel articulation , 1982 .

[87]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  DISCUSSION NOTES Some Major Features of the International Phonetic Alphabet , 1988 .

[88]  W. Hardcastle,et al.  An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences , 1979 .

[89]  Klaus J. Kohler Die Instabilität wortfinaler Alveolarpiosive im Deutschen: eine elektropalatographische Untersuchung , 1976 .

[90]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[91]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[92]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .