Translation of a circulating microRNA signature of melanoma into a solid tissue assay to improve diagnostic accuracy and precision.

Background: Successful treatment of cutaneous melanoma depends on early and accurate diagnosis of clinically suspicious melanocytic skin lesions. Multiple international studies have described the challenge of providing accurate and reproducible histopathological assessments of melanocytic lesions, highlighting the need for new diagnostic tools including disease-specific biomarkers. Previously, a 38-microRNA signature (“MEL38”) was identified in melanoma patient plasma and validated as a novel biomarker. In this study, MEL38 expression in solid tissue biopsies representing the benign naevi to metastatic melanoma spectrum is examined. Methods: Nanostring digital gene expression assessment of the MEL38 signature was performed on 308 formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies of naevi, melanoma in-situ and invasive melanoma. Genomic data were interrogated using hierarchical clustering, univariate, and multivariate statistical approaches. Classification scores computed from the MEL38 signature were analysed for their association with demographic data and histopathology results, including MPATH-DX class, AJCC disease stage and tissue subtype. Results: The MEL38 score can stratify higher-risk melanomas (MPATH-Dx Class V or more advanced) from lower-risk skin lesions (Class I-IV) with an area-under-the curve of 0.97 (P<0.001). The genomic score ranges from 0 to 10 and is positively correlated with melanoma progression, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 with stage 0 to IV disease. Using an optimised classification threshold of ≥2.7 accurately identifies higher-risk melanomas, associated with poorer outcomes and more intensive suggested clinical actions with 89% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Multivariate analysis showed the score to be a significant predictor of malignancy, independent of technical and clinical covariates. Application of the MEL38 signature to spitz naevi reveal an intra-subtype profile, with elements of the profile in common to both naevi and melanoma. Conclusion: Melanoma-specific circulating microRNAs maintain their association with malignancy when measured in the hypothesized tissue of origin. The MEL38 signature is an accurate and reproducible metric of melanoma status, based on changes in microRNA expression that occur as the disease develops and spreads. Inclusion of the MEL38 score into routine practice would provide physicians with previously unavailable, personalised genomic information about their patient’s skin lesions. Combining molecular biomarker data with conventional histopathology data may improve diagnostic accuracy, healthcare resource utilisation, and patient outcomes.

[1]  J. Gershenwald,et al.  Discordance in Diagnosis of Melanocytic Lesions and Its Impact on Clinical Management. , 2021, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  H. Welch,et al.  The Rapid Rise in Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnoses. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Andrea C. Radick,et al.  Terminology for melanocytic skin lesions and the MPATH‐Dx classification schema: A survey of dermatopathologists , 2020, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[4]  Roman C. Maron,et al.  Overdiagnosis of melanoma – causes, consequences and solutions , 2020, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[5]  R. Rubin Melanoma Diagnoses Rise While Mortality Stays Fairly Flat, Raising Concerns About Overdiagnosis. , 2020, JAMA.

[6]  C. Schmults,et al.  Cost and Utilization of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Melanoma: Cross-Sectional Analysis in the Medicare Population, 2013 and 2015. , 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  S. Fereday,et al.  Characterisation and validation of Mel38; A multi-tissue microRNA signature of cutaneous melanoma , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  R. Van Laar,et al.  A plasma microRNA biomarker of melanoma as a personalised assessment of treatment response , 2019, Melanoma research.

[9]  H. Soyer,et al.  Dermoscopy and Overdiagnosis of Melanoma In Situ. , 2018, JAMA dermatology.

[10]  R. Van Laar,et al.  Development and validation of a plasma-based melanoma biomarker suitable for clinical use , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Pathologists ' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations : observer accuracy and reproducibility study , 2019 .

[13]  Iris Barshack,et al.  Melanoma miRNA trafficking controls tumour primary niche formation , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  Tumaini R. Coker,et al.  Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2023, JAMA.

[15]  Benjamin Stoff,et al.  Discordance of histopathologic parameters in cutaneous melanoma: Clinical implications. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  P. Sainsbury Development and oversight of ethical health promotion quality assurance and evaluation activities involving human participants. , 2015, Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals.

[17]  B. B. Weitner,et al.  Histomorphologic Assessment and Interobserver Diagnostic Reproducibility of Atypical Spitzoid Melanocytic Neoplasms With Long-term Follow-up , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[18]  J. Elmore,et al.  The MPATH-Dx reporting schema for melanocytic proliferations and melanoma. , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  R. Sullivan,et al.  MAP kinase signaling and inhibition in melanoma , 2013, Oncogene.

[20]  M. Mihm,et al.  Histologically challenging melanocytic tumors referred to a tertiary care pigmented lesion clinic. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  Heidi M Rolfe Accuracy in skin cancer diagnosis: A retrospective study of an Australian public hospital dermatology department , 2012, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[22]  S. Feldman,et al.  How good are US dermatologists at discriminating skin cancers? A number-needed-to-treat analysis , 2012, The Journal of dermatological treatment.

[23]  C. Rosendahl,et al.  Measuring performance in skin cancer practice: the SCARD initiative , 2011, International journal of dermatology.

[24]  M. Kashani-Sabet,et al.  Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  Graham G Giles,et al.  Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985 , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  R. Corona,et al.  Interobserver variability on the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M A Weinstock,et al.  Epidemiology of melanoma. , 2017, Cancer treatment and research.