Is patient reporting of physical function accurate following total knee replacement?

The aim of this study was to determine the association between the Oxford knee score (OKS) and direct assessment of outcome, and to examine how this relationship varied at different time-points following total knee replacement (TKR). Prospective data consisting of the OKS, numerical rating scales for 'worst pain' and 'perceived mean daily pain', timed functional assessments (chair rising, stairs and walking ability), goniometry and lower limb power were recorded for 183 patients pre-operatively and at six, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively. The OKS was influenced primarily by the patient's level of pain rather than objective functional assessments. The relationship between report of outcome and direct assessment changed over time: R2 = 35% pre-operatively, 44% at six weeks, 57% at 26 weeks and 62% at 52 weeks. The relationship between assessment of performance and report of performance improved as the patient's report of pain diminished, suggesting that patients' reporting of functional outcome after TKR is influenced more by their pain level than their ability to accomplish tasks.

[1]  Ronald Melzack,et al.  Handbook of pain assessment , 1992 .

[2]  N Verdonschot,et al.  How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? , 2008, The Knee.

[3]  P. Baker,et al.  Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  P. Stratford,et al.  Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Rgn Pgce Amelia Williamson MSc,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales , 2005 .

[6]  J. Oldham,et al.  The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[7]  M. Jensen,et al.  The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients , 1996, PAIN.

[8]  C. Terwee,et al.  Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  R. Coombes,et al.  Ahead of the game , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Paul Karoly,et al.  Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults , 1992 .

[11]  R L Lamb,et al.  Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[12]  C. Ramsay,et al.  The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  E. Bassey,et al.  A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Thomas Bandholm,et al.  Reliability of knee joint range of motion and circumference measurements after total knee arthroplasty: does tester experience matter? , 2010, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[17]  M. Jensen,et al.  Assessing Global Pain Severity by Self-Report in Clinical and Health Services Research , 2000, Spine.

[18]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  J. Dawson,et al.  The use of outcome measures relating to the knee , 2010 .

[20]  D. Murray,et al.  Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  S. Perrot,et al.  Comparison of daily, weekly or monthly pain assessments in hip and knee osteoarthritis. A 29-day prospective study. , 2011, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[22]  A. Carr,et al.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[24]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[25]  S. Lamb,et al.  Recovery of mobility after knee arthroplasty: expected rates and influencing factors. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  P. Stratford,et al.  Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  B. Hoggart,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[28]  A. Davies.  Rating systems for total knee replacement. , 2002, The Knee.

[29]  H. Doll,et al.  Leg extensor power and quadriceps strength: an assessment of repeatability in patients with osteoarthritic knees , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  D W Murray,et al.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  A. Carr,et al.  Are pain and function better measures of outcome than revision rates after TKR in the younger patient? , 2010, The Knee.