Material flow analysis for Europe: An exergoecological approach

Material flow analysis is a key tool to quantify and monitor the use of natural resources. A very visual way to undertake such analyses representing the mineral trade is through Sankey diagrams, in which the mineral resources that are extracted, imported, exported, recycled and consumed within the given boundaries are represented with the arrows proportional to their respective quantities. Yet Sankey diagrams alone are not sensitive to the quality of the resources as they only reflect tonnage. This issue can lead to misleading conclusions and thereby not effective resource policies. A way to overcome this deficiency is representing the flows in exergy replacement cost (ERC) terms instead of tonnage. Exergy replacement cost is a concept derived from the second law of thermodynamics and assesses the exergy cost required to return with available technologies a given mineral to its initial conditions of composition and concentration in the mines where it was found, once it has been dispersed after use. Using this methodology, minerals are physically valued in terms of their respective scarcities and the effort (in exergy cost terms) required to produce them. Accordingly, in this paper the so-called exergoecology method is used to evaluate mineral trade and foreign mineral dependency in the EU-28 for 1995 to 2012. Using the year 2011 as a case study, it can be seen using this novel approach that 45.8% of the total input of minerals are imported resulting in lower values of self-sufficiency than if a traditional MFA were applied (0.45 for minerals and 0.41 for fossil fuels, in contrast to 0.79 and 0.52 obtained respectively when using tonnes). Analyzing 10 of the 20 minerals deemed critical by the European Commission, of the total internal production, 0.88% corresponded to critical minerals when data were expressed in tonnes and 3.19% when expressed in exergy replacement costs, highlighting their relevance respect to other minerals. This external dependency leaves Europe in a delicate situation regarding fossil fuels and non-fuel minerals supply highlighting the importance of recycling especially scarce minerals and searching for alternative sources.

[1]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Exergoecology: A thermodynamic approach for accounting the Earth's mineral capital. The case of bauxite–aluminium and limestone–lime chains , 2010 .

[2]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Regional Patterns in Global Resource Extraction , 2006 .

[3]  Alexandra Kriz,et al.  Aggregates Resources Policies in Europe , 2011 .

[4]  Antonio Valero,et al.  The crepuscular planet. A model for the exhausted atmosphere and hydrosphere , 2011 .

[5]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Globalisation and the Shifting Environmental Burden , 2004 .

[6]  G. Mudd.  Global trends in gold mining: Towards quantifying environmental and resource sustainability , 2007 .

[7]  H. Haberl,et al.  Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century , 2009 .

[8]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe , 2008 .

[9]  S. Jørgensen,et al.  Towards A Thermodynamic Theory For Ecological Systems , 2004 .

[10]  S. Giljum,et al.  Materials embodied in international trade – Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005 , 2012 .

[11]  Helga Weisz,et al.  The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption , 2006 .

[12]  Antonio Valero,et al.  How to account for mineral depletion. The exergy and economic mineral balance of Spain as a case study , 2014 .

[13]  Gavin M Mudd,et al.  The future of Yellowcake: a global assessment of uranium resources and mining. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Economy-wide material flow indicators: Overall framework, purposes and uses and comparison of material use and resource intensity of the Czech Republic, Germany and the EU-15 , 2012 .

[15]  Jan Kovanda,et al.  The importance of raw material equivalents in economy-wide material flow accounting and its policy dimension , 2013 .

[16]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  International Trade, Material Flows and Land Use: Developing a Physical Trade Balance for the European Union , 2001 .

[17]  G. Mudd,et al.  The environmental costs of platinum-PGM mining and sustainability: Is the glass half-full or half-empty? , 2010 .

[18]  Antonio Valero Capilla,et al.  Thanatia: The Destiny of the Earth's Mineral Resources : A Thermodynamic Cradle-to-Cradle Assessment , 2014 .

[19]  N. Lior,et al.  Advances in energy studies , 2009 .

[20]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Physical Hydronomics: application of the exergy analysis to the assessment of environmental costs of water bodies. The case of the inland basins of Catalonia. , 2009 .

[21]  G. Tiess.  Minerals policy in Europe: Some recent developments , 2010 .

[22]  Christoph Helbig,et al.  How to evaluate raw material supply risks—an overview , 2013 .

[23]  Bin Chen,et al.  Ecological accounting for China based on extended exergy , 2014 .

[24]  Antonio Valero,et al.  The crepuscular planet. A model for the exhausted continental crust , 2011 .

[25]  F. Krausmann,et al.  Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Bin Chen,et al.  Ecological accounting based on extended exergy: a sustainability perspective. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  A. Valero,et al.  What are the clean reserves of fossil fuels , 2012 .