tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke

Objective. The aim of this exploratory pilot study is to test the effects of bilateral tDCS combined with upper extremity robot-assisted therapy (RAT) on stroke survivors. Methods. We enrolled 23 subjects who were allocated to 2 groups: RAT + real tDCS and RAT + sham-tDCS. Each patient underwent 10 sessions (5 sessions/week) over two weeks. Outcome measures were collected before and after treatment: (i) Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), (ii) Box and Block Test (BBT), and (iii) Motor Activity Log (MAL). Results. Both groups reported a significant improvement in FMA-UE score after treatment (p < 0.01). No significant between-groups differences were found in motor function. However, when the analysis was adjusted for stroke type and duration, a significant interaction effect (p < 0.05) was detected, showing that stroke duration (acute versus chronic) and type (cortical versus subcortical) modify the effect of tDCS and robotics on motor function. Patients with chronic and subcortical stroke benefited more from the treatments than patients with acute and cortical stroke, who presented very small changes. Conclusion. The additional use of bilateral tDCS to RAT seems to have a significant beneficial effect depending on the duration and type of stroke. These results should be verified by additional confirmatory studies.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation , 2009, Stroke.

[3]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[4]  Justin M. Drogos,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the expression of the flexor synergy in the paretic arm in chronic stroke is dependent on shoulder abduction loading , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  C. Calautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review , 2003, Stroke.

[6]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[8]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Anatomy of Stroke Injury Predicts Gains From Therapy , 2011, Stroke.

[9]  Viswanathan Ramakrishnan,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose–Response Relationship , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  S. Saeki,et al.  Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  J. Summers,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[14]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Corticospinal Excitability as a Predictor of Functional Gains at the Affected Upper Limb Following Robotic Training in Chronic Stroke Survivors , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  W. Byblow,et al.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[18]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robot-Assisted Arm Training in Subacute Stroke Patients , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

[19]  Wayne Dite,et al.  Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. , 2004, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[20]  S. Barbay,et al.  Rehabilitative Training Promotes Rapid Motor Recovery but Delayed Motor Map Reorganization in a Rat Cortical Ischemic Infarct Model , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Winston D. Byblow,et al.  An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke. , 2014, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. , 2000, Science.

[24]  CinziaCalautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults , 2003 .

[25]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[27]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Domenico Formica,et al.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[29]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[30]  Giovanni Pellegrino,et al.  Immediate and Late Modulation of Interhemipheric Imbalance With Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Stroke , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  G W Thickbroom,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[32]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Resting State Interhemispheric Motor Connectivity and White Matter Integrity Correlate with Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[33]  Bernhard Elsner,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[35]  Patrick McElduff,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Does it Have Merit in Stroke Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[36]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of tDCS Combined With Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Poststroke Patients , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  P. Schestatsky,et al.  Comparison of blinding effectiveness between sham tDCS and placebo sertraline in a 6-week major depression randomized clinical trial , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training? , 2015, Neuroreport.

[39]  P. Stanzione,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients , 2013, European journal of neurology.

[40]  S. Paolucci,et al.  The Ineffective Role of Cathodal tDCS in Enhancing the Functional Motor Outcomes in Early Phase of Stroke Rehabilitation: An Experimental Trial , 2014, BioMed research international.

[41]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Interhemispheric Modulation Induced by Cortical Stimulation and Motor Training , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[42]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients , 2010, Neurology.

[43]  M. Hommel,et al.  Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  Lynne V. Gauthier,et al.  Size doesn't matter: cortical stroke lesion volume is not associated with upper extremity motor impairment and function in mild, chronic hemiparesis. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[45]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[46]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke☆ , 2014, NeuroImage.

[47]  Hui Chen,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[48]  R. Carson,et al.  Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[49]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[50]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: a pilot study on patients after stroke. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[51]  D. Liebetanz,et al.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  Janine Reis,et al.  Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[53]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[54]  D. Reinkensmeyer.  Robotic assistance for upper extremity training after stroke. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[55]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[56]  Thomas A. Zeffiro,et al.  Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke Is Associated With Ipsilesional Primary Motor Cortical Activity: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, Stroke.

[57]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[58]  F L Mastaglia,et al.  Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke. , 2009, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[59]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  A. Pavlovic,et al.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  F. Fregni,et al.  Systematic Review of Parameters of Stimulation, Clinical Trial Design Characteristics, and Motor Outcomes in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[62]  G. Kwakkel.  Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[63]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  A Closed-Loop Brain–Computer Interface Triggering an Active Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Inducing Cortical Neural Plasticity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[64]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.