Adapting to the human world: Dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues

Dogs are more skilful than a host of other species at tasks which require they respond to human communicative gestures in order to locate hidden food. Four basic interpretations for this proficiency surface from distilling the research findings. One possibility is that dogs simply have more opportunity than other species to learn to be responsive to human social cues. A different analysis suggests that the domestication process provided an opening for dogs to apply general cognitive problem-solving skills to a novel social niche. Some researchers go beyond this account and propose that dogs' co-evolution with humans equipped them with a theory of mind for social exchanges. Finally, a more prudent approach suggests that sensitivity to the behaviours of both humans and conspecifics would be particularly advantageous for a social scavenger like the dog. A predisposition to attend to human actions allows for rapid early learning of the association between gestures and the availability of food.

[1]  J. E. Rice,et al.  Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. , 1997, Science.

[2]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[3]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  C. Wynne,et al.  A review of domestic dogs' (Canis familiaris) human-like behaviors: or why behavior analysts should stop worrying and love their dogs. , 2008, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  P. McConnell Acoustic structure and receiver response in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[8]  Harry Frank,et al.  Comparison of problem-solving performance in six-week-old wolves and dogs , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Natalie,et al.  Genetic Structure of the Purebred Domestic Dog , 2004 .

[10]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[11]  L. Trut,et al.  DOMESTICATION IN THE SILVER FOX (VULPES FULVUS DESM): CHANGES IN PHYSIOLOGICAL BOUNDARIES OF THE SENSITIVE PERIOD OF PRIMARY SOCIALIZATION , 1985 .

[12]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  B. Hyman,et al.  The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication , 2007 .

[14]  S. Itakura,et al.  Learning to use experimenter-given cues during an object-choice task by a capuchin monkey , 1996 .

[15]  József Topál,et al.  Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[16]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[17]  Kim A. Bard,et al.  Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes , 1999 .

[18]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Comparative social cognition: From wolf and dog to humans , 2006 .

[19]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  J. Neiworth,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a new world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  C. Wynne,et al.  Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. , 1997, Child development.

[24]  M. Feinstein,et al.  An updated description of the New Guinea singing dog (Canis hallstromi, Troughton 1957) , 2003 .

[25]  C. Wynne,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[27]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humans. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[28]  C. Wynne,et al.  Ontogeny's impacts on human–dog communication , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Konrad Z. Lorenz,et al.  Evolution and Modification of Behaviour , 1965 .

[30]  P. Marler A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. , 1970 .

[31]  S. Shettleworth The evolution of comparative cognition: Is the snark still a boojum? , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[32]  Integrating two evolutionary models for the study of social cognition , 2002 .

[33]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[34]  N. Emery,et al.  Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays , 2001, Nature.

[35]  J. Call,et al.  Word Learning in a Domestic Dog: Evidence for "Fast Mapping" , 2004, Science.

[36]  Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a new world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2002 .

[37]  B. Hare,et al.  Social Cognitive Evolution in Captive Foxes Is a Correlated By-Product of Experimental Domestication , 2005, Current Biology.

[38]  Gabriella Lakatos,et al.  A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[39]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Communication of Food Location Between Human and Dog ( Canis Familiaris ) , 1998 .

[40]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Juliet Clutton-Brock,et al.  Origins of the dog: domestication and early history , 1995 .

[42]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[43]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Human-like social skills in dogs? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner , 2003 .

[45]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The emotional reactivity hypothesis and cognitive evolution Reply to Miklósi and Topál , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[47]  V. Csányi,et al.  Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[48]  C. Allen,et al.  The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition , 2002 .

[49]  S. Shettleworth Constraints on Learning , 1972 .

[50]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Is there a simple recipe for how to make friends? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[52]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A Simple Reason for a Big Difference Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do , 2003, Current Biology.

[53]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[54]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[55]  P. Bateson,et al.  The Domestic Cat : The Biology of Its Behaviour , 1989 .

[56]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding , 2006, Cognition.

[57]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The early ontogeny of human–dog communication , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  L. Trut Early Canid Domestication: The Farm-Fox Experiment , 1999, American Scientist.

[59]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The effect of humans on the cognitive development of apes , 1996 .

[60]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[61]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs , 2002, Science.

[62]  K. Hollis,et al.  Novel strategies of subordinate fish competing for food: learning when to fold , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[64]  Brian Hare,et al.  From Nonhuman to Human Mind , 2007 .

[65]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Structure of the Purebred Domestic Dog , 2004, Science.

[66]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[67]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[68]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’ , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[70]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[71]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.