Extraction of geological information from acoustic well-logging waveforms using time-frequency wavelets

Recently developed classification and regression methods are applied to extract geological information from acoustic well‐logging waveforms. First, acoustic waveforms are classified into the ones propagated through sandstones and the ones propagated through shale using the local discriminant basis (LDB) method. Next, the volume fractions of minerals are estimated (e.g., quartz and gas) at each depth using the local regression basis (LRB) method. These methods first analyze the waveforms by decomposing them into a redundant set of time‐frequency wavelets, i.e., the orthogonal wiggle traces localized in both time and frequency. Then, they automatically extract the local waveform features useful for such classification and estimation or regression. Finally, these features are fed into conventional classifiers or predictors. Because these extracted features are localized in time and frequency, they allow intuitive interpretation. Using the field data set, we found that it was possible to classify the waveform...

[1]  William F. Murphy,et al.  Modulus decomposition of compressional and shear velocities in sand bodies , 1993 .

[2]  R. E. Hoard Sonic Waveform Logging: A New Way To Obtain Subsurface Geologic Information , 1983 .

[3]  R. Coifman,et al.  Local feature extraction and its applications using a library of bases , 1994 .

[4]  K. Hsu,et al.  Wave separation and feature extraction of acoustic well-logging waveforms using Karhunen-Loeve transformation , 1990 .

[5]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Local discriminant bases , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  Frederick L. Paillet,et al.  Acoustic Waves in Boreholes , 1991 .

[7]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[8]  Naoki Saito,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF GEOPHYSICAL ACOUSTIC WAVEFORMS USING TIME-FREQUENCY ATOMS , 1996 .

[9]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[10]  Casimir A. Kulikowski,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning and Expert Systems , 1990 .

[11]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  The Best Two Independent Measurements Are Not the Two Best , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  S. Kimminau,et al.  A Coherent Framework For Developing And Applying Multiple Formation Evaluation Models , 1986 .

[13]  George R. Coates,et al.  Applying Mineral Knowledge To Standard Log Interpretation , 1990 .

[14]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[15]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  IMPROVED LOCAL DISCRIMINANT BASES USING EMPIRICAL PROBABILITY DENSITY ESTIMATION , 1996 .

[16]  M. Victor Wickerhauser,et al.  Adapted wavelet analysis from theory to software , 1994 .

[17]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  CONSTRUCTIONS OF LOCAL ORTHONORMAL BASES FOR CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION , 1994 .

[18]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Semblance processing of borehole acoustic array data , 1984 .

[19]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[20]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[21]  M. Basseville Distance measures for signal processing and pattern recognition , 1989 .

[22]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.