A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study is to report a multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy to treat patients with early stage cervical cancer with respect to perioperative outcomes. METHODS A multi-institutional robotic surgical consortium consisting of five board-certified gynecologist oncologist in distinct geographical regions of the United States was created to evaluate the utility of robotics for gynecologic surgery (benign and malignant). Between April 2003 and August 2008, a total of 835 patients underwent robotic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders and/or gynecologic malignancies by a surgeon in the consortium. IRB approval was obtained and data was collected in a prospective fashion at each institution. For the purposes of the study, a multi-institutional HIPPA compliant database was then created for all patients that underwent robotic-assisted surgery between the April 2003 and August 2008. This database was queried for all patients who underwent a robotic-assisted type II or III radical hysterectomy for Stage IA1 (+vsi)-IB2 cervical carcinoma. Forty-two patients were identified. Records were then reviewed for demographic data, medical conditions, prior abdominal or pelvic surgeries, and follow-up. The perioperative outcomes analyzed included: operative time (skin-skin), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, total lymph node count, conversion to laparotomy, and operative complications. RESULTS From a database of 835 patients who underwent robotic surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, a total of 42 patients who underwent a robotic-assisted type II (n=10) or type III (n=32) radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer were identified. Demographic data demonstrated a median age of 41 and a median BMI of 25.1. With regard to stage, seven patients (17%) were Stage IA2, twenty-eight patients (67%) were Stage IB1 and six patients (14%) were Stage IB2. There was a single patient with Stage IA1 cervical cancer with vascular space invasion who underwent a type II radical hysterectomy. The overall median operative time was 215 min. The overall median estimated blood loss was 50 cc. No patient received a blood transfusion. The median lymph node count was 25. The median hospital stay was 1 day. Positive lymph nodes were detected in 12% of the patients. Pelvic radiotherapy or chemo-radiation was given to 14% of the patients based on final surgical pathology. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4.8% of the patients and included one conversion to laparotomy (2.4%) and one ureteral injury (2.4%). Postoperative complications were reported in 12% of the patients and included a DVT (2.4%), infection (7.2%), and bladder/urinary tract complication (2.4%) The conversion rate to laparotomy was 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy is associated with minimal blood loss, a shortened hospital stay, and few operative complications. Operative time and lymph node yields are acceptable. This data suggests that robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy may offer an alternative to traditional radical hysterectomy. This series contributes to the growing literature on robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy and prospective comparisons with traditional radical hysterectomy are needed.

[1]  T. Tillmanns,et al.  Update on minimally invasive surgery in the management of gynecologic malignancies: focus on robotic laparoscopic systems , 2007 .

[2]  Young Tae Kim,et al.  Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  R Kevin Reynolds,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[4]  E. Surwit,et al.  Combined laparoscopic and vaginal surgery for the management of two cases of stage I endometrial cancer. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  A. Advincula,et al.  Preliminary Experience With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging of Gynecologic Malignancies , 2005, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[6]  J. Hentz,et al.  Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Managing medical complications in patients with brain tumors , 2007 .

[8]  Jubilee Brown,et al.  Comparison of Total Laparoscopic and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  J. Fanning,et al.  Robotic radical hysterectomy. , 2009, Minerva ginecologica.

[10]  J. Thigpen The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in early endometrial cancer by members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in 2005 , 2008 .

[11]  P. Gehrig,et al.  A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  G. Wang,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  R. Holloway,et al.  Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  R. Coleman,et al.  The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in early endometrial cancer by members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in 2005. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  Carol L. Brown,et al.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  M. Canis,et al.  [Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?]. , 1990, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[19]  F. Nezhat,et al.  Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer , 2008, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[20]  K. Hatch,et al.  Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  M. Burrell,et al.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  E. Venkatraman,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  Concepcion R. Diaz-Arrastia,et al.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[24]  A. Weaver,et al.  Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer: morbidity and survival. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  J. Magrina Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer , 2005, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[26]  G. Gross,et al.  Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer: laparotomy versus laparoscopy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  R. Romero,et al.  Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  L. Roman,et al.  Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program. , 2006, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[29]  P. Box Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy:The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience , 2006 .

[30]  V. Abeler,et al.  Robotic radical hysterectomy in early‐stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[31]  A. Weaver,et al.  Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[32]  N. Spirtos,et al.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  K. Hatch,et al.  The role of laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology , 1995, Cancer.