The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation.

[1]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[2]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Does the use of probabilistic genotyping change the way we should view sub-threshold data? , 2017 .

[3]  Charles E H Berger,et al.  The LR does not exist. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[4]  Michael D. Coble,et al.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion , 2016, BMC Genetics.

[5]  Simone Gittelson,et al.  Low-template DNA: A single DNA analysis or two replicates? , 2016, Forensic science international.

[6]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data? , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles , 2014, Electrophoresis.

[10]  John M. Butler,et al.  Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Interpretation , 2014 .

[11]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[12]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  P Gill,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  M. Perlin,et al.  Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation * ,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  John Buckleton,et al.  Validation and development of interpretation guidelines for low copy number (LCN) DNA profiling in New Zealand using the AmpFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[16]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[17]  P. Gill,et al.  PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[18]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[19]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[20]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[21]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  A comparison of statistical models for the analysis of complex forensic DNA profiles. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.