Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of Probiotics for the Prevention of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea in a Provincial Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE To conduct a full economic evaluation assessing the costs and consequences related to probiotic use for the primary prevention of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD). DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis using decision analytic modeling. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the risk of CDAD and the costs of receiving oral probiotics versus not over a time horizon of 30 days. The target population modeled was all adult inpatients receiving any therapeutic course of antibiotics from a publicly funded healthcare system perspective. Effectiveness estimates were based on a recent systematic review of probiotics for the primary prevention of CDAD. Additional estimates came from local data and the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess how plausible changes in variables impacted the results. RESULTS Treatment with oral probiotics led to direct costs of CDN $24 per course of treatment per patient. On average, patients treated with oral probiotics had a lower overall cost compared with usual care (CDN $327 vs $845). The risk of CDAD was reduced from 5.5% in those not receiving oral probiotics to 2% in those receiving oral probiotics. These results were robust to plausible variation in all estimates. CONCLUSIONS Oral probiotics as a preventive strategy for CDAD resulted in a lower risk of CDAD as well as cost-savings. The cost-savings may be greater in other healthcare systems that experience a higher incidence and cost associated with CDAD. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1079–1086

[1]  A. Maw,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Probiotic Use to Prevent Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Adults Receiving Antibiotics , 2017, Open forum infectious diseases.

[2]  E. Goldstein,et al.  A Decade of Experience in Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection at a Community Hospital Using the Probiotic Combination Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (Bio-K+). , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  B. Sander,et al.  The Economic Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review , 2015, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[4]  C. Donskey,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Clostridium difficile Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  E. Dubberke,et al.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection , 2014, Current opinion in gastroenterology.

[6]  Carol A. Keohane,et al.  Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[7]  C. Butler,et al.  Nutrition economic evaluation of a probiotic in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea , 2013, Front. Pharmacol..

[8]  B. Currie,et al.  Impact of adding prophylactic probiotics to a bundle of standard preventative measures for Clostridium difficile infections: enhanced and sustained decrease in the incidence and severity of infection at a community hospital , 2013, Current medical research and opinion.

[9]  V. Palda,et al.  Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized patients: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[10]  B. Nathanson,et al.  Length of stay and hospital costs among high-risk patients with hospital-origin Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea , 2013, Journal of medical economics.

[11]  V. Haley,et al.  Comparison of 2 Clostridium difficile Surveillance Methods National Healthcare Safely Network's Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting Module versus Clinical Infection Surveillance , 2013, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  J. LeLorier,et al.  Savings from the use of a probiotic formula in the prophylaxis of antibiotic-associated diarrhea , 2012, Journal of medical economics.

[13]  L. Miller,et al.  Dose–Response Efficacy of a Proprietary Probiotic Formula of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea Prophylaxis in Adult Patients , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[14]  D. Yokoe,et al.  Clinical Risk Factors for Severe Clostridium difficile–associated Disease , 2009, Emerging Infectious Diseases.

[15]  Helen Burstin,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Clostridium difficile Infections in Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  J. Lachaine,et al.  Effect of a fermented milk combining Lactobacillus acidophilus Cl1285 and Lactobacillus casei in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2007, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[17]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[18]  Jennifer Beardsley,et al.  Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  E. Bouza,et al.  Consequences of Clostridium difficile infection: understanding the healthcare burden. , 2012, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[20]  L. Cipriano,et al.  Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada , 2012 .