Comparison of Middle Ear Visualization With Endoscopy and Microscopy

Introduction: The primary goal of chronic ear surgery is the creation of a safe, clean dry ear. For cholesteatomas, complete removal of disease is dependent on visualization. Conventional microscopy is adequate for most dissection, but various subregions of the middle ear are better visualized with endoscopy. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to quantitatively assess the improved visualization that endoscopes afford as compared with operating microscopes. Methods: Microscopic and endoscopic views were simulated using a three-dimensional model developed from temporal bone scans. Surface renderings of the ear canal and middle ear subsegments were defined and the percentage of visualization of each middle ear subsegment, both with and without ossicles, was then determined for the microscope as well as for 0-, 30-, and 45-degree endoscopes. Using this information, we analyzed which mode of visualization is best suited for dissection within a particular anatomical region. Results: Using a 0-degree scope provides significantly more visualization of every subregion, except the antrum, compared with a microscope. In addition, angled scopes permit visualizing significantly more surface area of every subregion of the middle ear than straight scopes or microscopes. Conclusions: Endoscopes offer advantages for cholesteatoma dissection in difficult-to-visualize areas including the sinus tympani and epitympanum.

[1]  M. Tarabichi.  Transcanal Endoscopic Management of Cholesteatoma , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  D. Poe,et al.  Endoscope-assisted ear surgery. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[3]  Derald E. Brackmann,et al.  Cholesteatoma Surgery: Residual and Recurrent Disease , 1977, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[5]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Automatic Identification and 3D Rendering of Temporal Bone Anatomy , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Dongqing Zhang,et al.  Simulation of trans-nasal endoscopy of the middle ear for visualization of cholesteatoma , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[7]  M Badr-el-Dine,et al.  Value of Ear Endoscopy in Cholesteatoma Surgery , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  S. Vowler,et al.  A 5-Year Observational Study of the Outcome in Pediatric Cholesteatoma Surgery , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  K. Niemczyk,et al.  Comparison of visualization of the middle ear by microscope and endoscopes of 30° and 45° through posterior tympanotomy , 2014, Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques.