The Computational Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence: A Reflective Examination of a Theoretical Falsework

Advocates and critics of AI have long engaged in a debate that has generated a great deal of heat but little light. Whatever the merits of specific contributions to this ongoing debate, the fact that it continues points to the need for a reflective examination of the foundations of AI by its active practitioners. Following the lead of Earl MacCormac, we hope to advance such a reflective examination by considering questions of metaphor in science and the computational metaphor in AI. Specifically, we address three issues: the role of metaphor in science and AI, an examination of the computational metaphor, and an introduction to the possibility and potential value of using alternative metaphors as a foundation for AI theory.

[1]  Kenneth A. Johnson.  The Bag Model of Quark Confinement , 1979 .

[2]  E. Keller.  Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[3]  A.L. Norberg,et al.  Turing's man: Western culture in computer age , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Vernon Pratt,et al.  Thinking Machines: The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence , 1987 .

[5]  R. Bergland.  The fabric of mind , 1986 .

[6]  Drew McDermott,et al.  Introduction to artificial intelligence , 1986, Addison-Wesley series in computer science.

[7]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  John Haugeland.  Mind design , 1985 .

[9]  André Vellino.  T. Winograd and F. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[10]  W.R. McKinzie,et al.  The fifth generation , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  H. Gardner.  The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[12]  M. Lings,et al.  Articles , 1967, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[13]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Précis of The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Society of Mind: A Response to Four Reviews , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[15]  William C. Hill,et al.  The Mind at AI: Horseless Carriage to Clock , 1989, AI Mag..

[16]  J. Searle,et al.  Minds, Brains and Science , 1988 .

[17]  K. Pribram.  Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology , 1971 .

[18]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  John Haugeland,et al.  Artificial intelligence - the very idea , 1987 .

[20]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Logical foundations of artificial intelligence , 1987 .

[21]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[22]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[23]  D. Thomas King,et al.  Mind over Machine. , 1978 .

[24]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[25]  J. Michael.  Verbal behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  George Lakoff,et al.  A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. , 1987 .

[27]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[28]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Computer power and human reason , 1976, SGAR.

[29]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[30]  G. Reeke.  Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[31]  Donald Gustafson.  Minds, Brains, and Science , 1986 .

[32]  Michael Conrad.  Molecular computer design: a synthetic approach to brain theory , 1987 .

[33]  John McCarthy,et al.  Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines , 1979 .