Value-Driven Coordination Process Design Using Physical Delivery Models

Current e-business technology enables the execution of increasingly complex coordination processes that link IT services of different companies. Successful design of cross-organizational coordination processes requires the mutual alignment of the coordination process with a commercial business case. There is however a large conceptual gap between a commercial business case and a coordination process. The business case is stated in terms of commercial transactions, but the coordination process consists of sequences, choices and iterations of actions of people and machines that are absent from a business case model; also, the cardinality of the connections and the frequency and duration of activities are different in both models. This paper proposes a coordination process design method that focusses on the the shared physical world underlying the business case and coordination process. In this physical world, physical deliveries take place that realize commercial transactions and that must be coordinated by a coordination process. Physical delivery models allow us to identify the relevant cardinality, frequency and duration properties so that we can design the coordination process to respect these properties. In the case studies we have done so far, a physical delivery model is the greatest common denominator that we needed to verify consistency between a business case and a coordination process model.

[1]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Modelling Value-based Inter-Organizational Controls in Healthcare Regulations , 2006, I3E.

[2]  R. Wieringa,et al.  Monitoring Collaboration from a Value Perspective , 2007, 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference.

[3]  Gerald Foster,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis 6th Edition , 1987 .

[4]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Requirements Engineering Techniques for e-Services , 2008, CoopIS 2008.

[5]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the Tropos project , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[6]  W. McCarthy,et al.  USE OF AN ACCOUNTING OBJECT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR KNOWLEDGE-BASED ENTERPRISE MODELS , 1999 .

[7]  Hongjun Lu,et al.  Conceptual Modeling – ER 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Michael A. Jackson,et al.  Problem Frames - Analysing and Structuring Software Development Problems , 2000 .

[9]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Conceptual Modeling for E-Business and the Web , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Kurt Jensen,et al.  Coloured Petri Nets , 1997, Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science An EATCS Series.

[11]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches , 2007 .

[12]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Requirements Engineering: Frameworks for Understanding , 1996 .

[13]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Business Modelling Is Not Process Modelling , 2000, ER.

[14]  Madhav V. Rajan,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis , 1972 .

[15]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Value-oriented design of service coordination processes: correctness and trust , 2005, SAC '05.

[16]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[17]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[18]  Andreas Wombacher,et al.  Consistency Between e3-value Models and Activity Diagrams in a Multi-perspective Development Method , 2005, OTM Conferences.

[19]  Maria Bergholtz,et al.  Value modeling and the transformation from value model to process model , 2006 .

[20]  Robert Meersman,et al.  On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[21]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Conceptual Modeling — ER 2000 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Design methods for reactive systems - Yourdon, Statemate, and the UML , 2003 .

[23]  G. L. Geerts,et al.  Expert opinion [accounting] , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[24]  Petia Wohed,et al.  A Pattern and Dependency Based Approach to the Design of Process Models , 2004, ER.

[25]  Birger Andersson,et al.  From Business to Process Models - a Chaining Methodology , 2006, BUSITAL.

[26]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Bridging Business Value Models and Process Models in Aviation Value Webs via Possession Rights , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[27]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  From Entities and Relationships to Social Actors and Dependencies , 2000, ER.