Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies

[1]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Advances on a Decision Analytic Approach to Exposure‐Based Chemical Prioritization , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Risk associated with engineered nanomaterials: Different tools for different ways to govern , 2018, Nano Today.

[3]  Gigi Kwik Gronvall,et al.  Safety, security, and serving the public interest in synthetic biology , 2018, Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology.

[4]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A decision analytic model to guide early‐stage government regulatory action: Applications for synthetic biology , 2018 .

[5]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Community‐Driven Hypothesis Testing: A Solution for the Tragedy of the Anticommons , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  A. Marcomini,et al.  Decision Support for International Agreements Regulating Nanomaterials , 2018 .

[7]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Nanotoxicology and nanomedicine: making development decisions in an evolving governance environment , 2018, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[8]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Governance Strategies for a Sustainable Digital World , 2018 .

[9]  Benjamin D. Trump,et al.  Synthetic biology regulation and governance: Lessons from TAPIC for the United States, European Union, and Singapore. , 2017, Health policy.

[10]  Benjamin D. Trump,et al.  Public perceptions of climate geoengineering: a systematic review of the literature , 2017 .

[11]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Integrate life-cycle assessment and risk analysis results, not methods. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Jennifer Kuzma,et al.  Societal Risk Evaluation Scheme (SRES): Scenario-Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Synthetic Biology Applications , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  Daniel Vallero,et al.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Frameworks and tools for risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials. , 2016, Environment international.

[16]  Margaret MacDonell,et al.  Advancing Risk Analysis for Nanoscale Materials: Report from an International Workshop on the Role of Alternative Testing Strategies for Advancement , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Theo Vermeire,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Risk-Based and Prevention-Based Governance for Emerging Materials. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria risk management with the use of DecernsMCDA: methods and case studies , 2016, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[20]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Emerging Technologies for Environmental Remediation: Integrating Data and Judgment. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Epistemic Uncertainty in Agent-based Modeling , 2016 .

[22]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Synthetic biology’s multiple dimensions of benefits and risks: implications for governance and policies , 2016 .

[23]  Benjamin D. Trump,et al.  Not a Humbug: the evolution of patient-centred medical decision-making , 2015, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[24]  Translational governance research for synthetic biology , 2015 .

[25]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Living Regulatory Challenges of Synthetic Biology , 2014 .

[26]  Lang Tran,et al.  A unified framework for nanosafety is needed , 2014 .

[27]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing , 2014, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[28]  Sheila M. Olmstead,et al.  Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  D. Rejeski,et al.  Shaping ecological risk research for synthetic biology , 2014, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[30]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Sustainable nanotechnology: Defining,measuring and teaching , 2014 .

[31]  Igor Linkov,et al.  For nanotechnology decisions, use decision analysis , 2013 .

[32]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[33]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Integrating legal liabilities in nanomanufacturing risk management. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  J. Tait.  Adaptive governance of synthetic biology , 2012, EMBO reports.

[35]  R. Falkner,et al.  Regulating Nanotechnologies: Risk, Uncertainty and the Global Governance Gap , 2012, Global Environmental Politics.

[36]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[37]  Global Affairs Division.  Sustainability and the U.S. EPA , 2011 .

[38]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis , 2011, AMBIO.

[39]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  D. Vallero.  Environmental Biotechnology: A Biosystems Approach , 2010 .

[41]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Nanotechnology Risk Management , 2010 .

[42]  I. Linkov,et al.  Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials , 2009 .

[43]  Jane Calvert,et al.  The role of social scientists in synthetic biology , 2009, EMBO reports.

[44]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Toward a New U.S. Chemicals Policy: Rebuilding the Foundation to Advance New Science, Green Chemistry, and Environmental Health , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[45]  Anders Baun,et al.  The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks , 2009 .

[46]  Ortwin Renn.  White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards and Integrative Approach , 2009 .

[47]  Governing Synthetic Biology: processes and outcomes , 2009 .

[48]  K. Oye.  What rough beast ? Synthetic Biology and the Future of Biosecurity , 2009 .

[49]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Synthetic Biology the technoscience and its societal consequences , 2009 .

[50]  Jennifer Kuzma,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Oversight Assessment for Emerging Technologies , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[51]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials , 2008 .

[52]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis , 2008 .

[53]  H. Kastenholz,et al.  Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[54]  J. Sohn,et al.  Production of recombinant hirudin in Hansenula polymorpha: variation of gene expression level depends on methanol oxidase and fermentation strategies , 1998, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[55]  Division on Earth.  Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .