An Experimental Comparison of Ordinary and Universal Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting

A factorial, computational experiment was conducted to compare the spatial interpolation accuracy of ordinary and universal kriging and two types of inverse squared-distance weighting. The experiment considered, in addition to these four interpolation methods, the effects of four data and sampling characteristics: surface type, sampling pattern, noise level, and strength of small-scale spatial correlation. Interpolation accuracy was measured by the natural logarithm of the mean squared interpolation error. Main effects of all five factors, all two-factor interactions, and several three-factor interactions were highly statistically significant. Among numerous findings, the most striking was that the two kriging methods were substantially superior to the inverse distance weighting methods over all levels of surface type, sampling pattern, noise, and correlation.

[1]  Joel L Morrison.  OBSERVED STATISTICAL TRENDS IN VARIOUS INTERPOLATION ALGORITHMS USEFUL FOR FIRST STAGE INTERPOLATION , 1974 .

[2]  E. Bruce MacDougall.  Computer programming for spatial problems , 1976 .

[3]  Thomas K. Peucker.  THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL APPROACHES TO CONTOURING , 1980 .

[4]  R. Franke.  Scattered data interpolation: tests of some methods , 1982 .

[5]  C. Obled,et al.  Objective analyses and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: An objective comparison , 1982 .

[6]  N. Lam.  Spatial Interpolation Methods: A Review , 1983 .

[7]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[8]  J. Salas,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNIQUES FOR SPATIAL INTERPOLATION OF PRECIPITATION , 1985 .

[9]  Shahrokh Rouhani,et al.  Comparative Study of Ground-Water Mapping Techniques , 1986 .

[10]  A. MacEachren,et al.  Sampling and Isometric Mapping of Continuous Geographic Surfaces , 1987 .

[11]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH , 1987 .

[12]  A. Journel,et al.  When do we need a trend model in kriging? , 1989 .

[13]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Further Comparison of Spatial Methods for Predicting Soil pH , 1990 .

[14]  R. Haining.  Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences , 1990 .

[15]  James A. Lynch,et al.  Statistical analysis of errors in estimating wet deposition using five surface estimation algorithms , 1991 .

[16]  D. Weber,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II , 1992 .

[17]  Evan J. Englund,et al.  The effects of sampling design parameters on block selection , 1992 .

[18]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[20]  Jacques Gallichand,et al.  Mapping clay content for subsurface drainage in the Nile Delta , 1993 .

[21]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[22]  Geoffrey M. Laslett,et al.  Kriging and Splines: An Empirical Comparison of their Predictive Performance in Some Applications , 1994 .

[23]  Franky Albert Noël Declercq,et al.  Interpolation Methods for Scattered Sample Data: Accuracy, Spatial Patterns, Processing Time , 1996 .

[24]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: a soil survey case study. , 1996 .

[25]  Donald L. Phillips,et al.  USE OF AUXILIARY DATA FOR SPATIAL INTERPOLATION OF OZONE EXPOSURE IN SOUTHEASTERN FORESTS , 1997 .

[26]  Stephen P. Kaluzny,et al.  S+SpatialStats: User’s Manual for Windows® and UNIX® , 1998 .