Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale.

Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale were examined. Self-identified Chinese, Japanese, and Americans (N=136, 323, and 160, respectively) recruited at ethnic or general supermarkets in Southern California completed a 13-question Sense of Coherence scale with a choice of either four, five, or seven responses in either Chinese, Japanese, or English. The Japanese respondents more frequently reported difficulty with the scale, the Chinese more frequently skipped questions, and both these groups selected the midpoint more frequently on items that involved admitting to a positive emotion than did the Americans, who were more likely to indicate a positive emotion. Construct validity of the scale tended to be better for the Chinese and the Americans when there were four response choices and for the Japanese when there were seven. Although culture affected response patterns, the association of sense of coherence and health was positive in all three cultural groups.

[1]  Hadley Cantril,et al.  The pattern of human concerns , 1965 .

[2]  H. Markus,et al.  Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M A McDermott,et al.  A literature review of the critical elements in translation theory. , 1994, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[4]  M. McDermott,et al.  A process for translating and testing a quantitative measure for cross-cultural nursing research. , 1992, The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association.

[5]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students , 1995 .

[6]  A. Nyamathi.  Sense of coherence in minority women at risk for HIV infection. , 1993, Public health nursing.

[7]  N. Iwata,et al.  Japan-U.S. comparison of responses to depression scale items among adult workers , 1995, Psychiatry Research.

[8]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[9]  S. Sue,et al.  The Mental Health of Asian Americans: Contemporary Issues in Identifying and Treating Mental Problems. , 1984 .

[10]  R. M. Suinn,et al.  The Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale: An Initial Report , 1987 .

[11]  David W. Chapman,et al.  Translation Procedures for the Cross Cultural Use of Measurement Instruments , 1979 .

[12]  J. Flaskerud,et al.  Is the Likert scale format culturally biased? , 1988, Nursing research.

[13]  Alfred Doeblin.  The living thoughts of Confucius , 1948 .

[14]  Charles P. Chen.  Counseling applications of RET in a Chinese cultural context , 1995 .

[15]  J. Everett,et al.  Response Styles in a Cross-Cultural Managerial Study , 1984 .

[16]  N. Iwata,et al.  Responses to a self-administered depression scale among younger adolescents in Japan , 1994, Psychiatry Research.

[17]  E. Jones.  Translation of quantitative measures for use in cross-cultural research. , 1987, Nursing research.

[18]  J. Johnson,et al.  Effects of the Order of Presentation of Evaluative Dimensions for Bipolar Scales in Four Societies , 1981 .

[19]  C. Samuel-Hodge,et al.  Development and Testing of Culturally Sensitive Instruments for African American Women With Type 2 Diabetes , 2000, The Diabetes educator.

[20]  Thomas E. Whalen,et al.  A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients , 1976 .

[21]  Eli P. Cox,et al.  The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review , 1980 .

[22]  A. Antonovsky.  The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[23]  J. Schensul,et al.  The challenge of using Likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. , 1997, Nursing research.

[24]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .