The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods

The rationalization of logistics activities and processes is very important in the business and efficiency of every company. In this respect, transportation as a subsystem of logistics, whether internal or external, is potentially a huge area for achieving significant savings. In this paper, the emphasis is placed upon the internal transport logistics of a paper manufacturing company. It is necessary to rationalize the movement of vehicles in the company’s internal transport, that is, for the majority of the transport to be transferred to rail transport, because the company already has an industrial track installed in its premises. To do this, it is necessary to purchase at least two used wagons. The problem is formulated as a multi-criteria decision model with eight criteria and eight alternatives. The paper presents a new approach based on a combination of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and rough numbers, which is used for ranking the potential solutions and selecting the most suitable one. The rough Best–Worst Method (BWM) was used to determine the weight values of the criteria. The results obtained using a combination of these two methods in their rough form were verified by means of a sensitivity analysis consisting of a change in the weight criteria and comparison with the following methods in their conventional and rough forms: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Ordering Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). The results show very high stability of the model and ranks that are the same or similar in different scenarios.

[1]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a simple additive weight method , 2007 .

[3]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR , 2017 .

[4]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Yeu-Shiang Huang,et al.  Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Manish Kumar Sagar,et al.  Exploring Fuzzy SAW Method for Maintenance Strategy Selection Problem of Material Handling Equipment , 2013 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature , 2015 .

[10]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[11]  Sen Liu,et al.  A Study of Rural Logistics Center Location Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2017 .

[12]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach for Complicated Supply Chain Management Problems in Construction , 2017 .

[14]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2017 .

[15]  Alireza Afshari,et al.  Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem , 2010 .

[16]  Jin Qi,et al.  An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  Ladislav Bartuška,et al.  Costs Comparison and the Possibilities of Increasing the Transport Capacity with a Selection of the Appropriate Railway Wagons , 2016 .

[18]  Lóránt Tavasszy,et al.  Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method , 2017 .

[19]  Sen Guo,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  K R MacCrimmon,et al.  Decisionmaking among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach , 1968 .

[22]  Michel Dagenais,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Information Security Risk Assessment , 2012 .

[23]  Željko Stevi,et al.  THE SELECTION OF THE LOGISTICS CENTER LOCATION USING AHP METHOD , 2015 .

[24]  Zdzisław Pawlak,et al.  Anatomy of conflicts , 1992 .

[25]  Gintautas Bureika,et al.  Study of traction rolling-stock using in Lithuanian sector of railway line "Rail Baltica" , 2012 .

[26]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[27]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[28]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[29]  Ivan Petrovic,et al.  Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Xin Guo Ming,et al.  A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[32]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers , 2017 .

[33]  Alok Gupta,et al.  A Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Vendor Evaluation in a Supply Chain , 2012 .

[34]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Z-number DEA: A new possibilistic DEA in the context of Z-numbers , 2016, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[35]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[36]  Ilija Tanackov,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS model for supplier evaluation , 2016 .

[37]  Elton Moura Nickel,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis model to evaluate transport systems: An application in Florianópolis, Brazil , 2017 .

[38]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making: An example of sensitivity analysis , 2017 .

[39]  P. Koskinen,et al.  Supply chain challenges of North-European paper industry , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[40]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[41]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[42]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[43]  José Luis Míguez,et al.  The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: A review , 2015 .

[44]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[45]  G. Montazer,et al.  Landfill Site Selection Using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method and Artificial Neural Network Method; A Case Study from Lorestan Province, Iran , 2016 .

[46]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[47]  A. Zarei,et al.  Using fuzzy Delphi method in maintenance strategy selection problem , 2008 .

[48]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[49]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[50]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[51]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location , 2010 .

[52]  Marius Jakimavičius,et al.  Assessment of vilnius city development scenarios based on transport system modelling and multicriteria analysis , 2009 .

[53]  Yong Deng,et al.  A Method of Converting Z-number to Classical Fuzzy Number , 2012 .

[54]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  D. Tsamboulas A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments , 2007 .