Grounding Cognition: Constraints on Spatial Language Comprehension: Function and Geometry

[1]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Attention in Spatial Language: Bridging Geometry and Function , 2005, Functional Features in Language and Space.

[2]  Kenny R. Coventry Spatial prepositions, functional relations, and lexical specification , 1998 .

[3]  M. Tarr,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.

[4]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of''over , 2001 .

[5]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[6]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Interpreting Words in Spatial Descriptions , 1988 .

[7]  Claude Vandeloise,et al.  Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French , 1991 .

[8]  Rolf A. Zwaan The Immersed Experiencer: Toward An Embodied Theory Of Language Comprehension , 2003 .

[9]  A Study in Unified Diversity: English and Mixtec Locatives , 2004 .

[10]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Functional Relations on Spatial Term Selection , 1996 .

[11]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Gesturing and Naming , 2003, Psychological science.

[12]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Perceived motion in the vector sum direction , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[14]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[16]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[17]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction , 1997 .

[18]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Function, geometry and spatial prepositions: Three experiments , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[19]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  Functional influences on orienting a reference frame , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[20]  David C. Bennett,et al.  Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions : an essay in stratificational semantics , 1979 .

[21]  S. Garrod,et al.  In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions , 1999, Cognition.

[22]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[24]  Terry Regier,et al.  The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism , 1996 .

[25]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[26]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Spatial Prepositions, Object-Specific Function, and Task Requirements , 1994, J. Semant..

[27]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[28]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations , 1996 .

[29]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Selecting a reference frame , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[30]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[32]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .

[33]  R. Langacker Grammatical traces of some ‘invisible’ semantic constructs , 1993 .

[34]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  “What” Effects on “Where”: Functional Influences on Spatial Relations , 1999 .