Multialternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist Model of Decision Making

The authors interpret decision field theory (J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend, 1993) as a connectionist network and extend it to accommodate multialternative preferential choice situations. This article shows that the classic weighted additive utility model (see R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa, 1976) and the classic Thurstone preferential choice model (see L. L. Thurstone, 1959) are special cases of this new multialternative decision field theory (MDFT), which also can emulate the search process of the popular elimination by aspects (EBA) model (see A. Tversky, 1969). The new theory is unique in its ability to explain several central empirical results found in the multialternative preference literature with a common set of principles. These empirical results include the similarity effect, the attraction effect, and the compromise effect, and the complex interactions among these three effects. The dynamic nature of the model also implies strong testable predictions concerning the moderating effect of time pressure on these three effects.

[1]  A. Diederich,et al.  Survey of decision field theory , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[2]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic Models of Response Time and Accuracy: A Foundational Primer. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[3]  Ashby,et al.  A Stochastic Version of General Recognition Theory. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[4]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Attribute Conflict and Preference Uncertainty: The RandMAU Model , 2000 .

[5]  A. Diederich,et al.  Conflict and the Stochastic-Dominance Principle of Decision Making , 1999 .

[6]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[7]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[8]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[9]  Candel,et al.  A Probabilistic Feature Model for Unfolding Tested for Perfect and Imperfect Nestings , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[10]  Diederich,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[11]  Tim Curran,et al.  Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision , 1997 .

[12]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Similarity in Context: Cognitive Representation and Violation of Preference and Perceptual Invariance in Consumer Choice☆ , 1996 .

[14]  Daniel S. Levine,et al.  Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Dynamic representation of decision-making , 1996 .

[16]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Phased Narrowing: A New Process Tracing Method for Decision Making , 1995 .

[17]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Seeking Subjective Dominance in Multidimensional Space: An Explanation of the Asymmetric Dominance Effect , 1995 .

[18]  Philip L. Smith.  Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[19]  David B. MacKay,et al.  Probabilistic multidimensional unfolding: an anisotropic model for preference ratio judgments , 1995 .

[20]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Context Effects, New Brand Entry, and Consideration Sets , 1994 .

[21]  B. Mellers,et al.  Similarity and Choice. , 1994 .

[22]  J. Mazanec,et al.  Consumer decision making. , 1994 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[24]  Marius Usher,et al.  A Neural Network Model for Attribute-Based Decision Processes , 1993, Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[27]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[29]  J. Townsend,et al.  Fundamental derivations from decision field theory , 1992 .

[30]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Complex decision rules in categorization : contrasting novice and experienced performance , 1992 .

[31]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Multivariate Models of Preference and Choice , 1992 .

[32]  D. H. Wedell,et al.  Distinguishing Among Models of Contextually Induced Preference Reversals , 1991 .

[33]  How Entrants Affect Multiple Brands: a Dual Attraction Mechanism , 1991 .

[34]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[35]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Human Information Processing: Measures, Mechanisms, and Models , 1990 .

[36]  R. Bhattacharya,et al.  Stochastic processes with applications , 1990 .

[37]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[38]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  A. A. J. Marley,et al.  A random utility family that includes many of the ‘classical’ models and has closed form choice probabilities and choice reaction times , 1989 .

[40]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  New developments in psychological choice modeling , 1989 .

[42]  Yoshio Takane,et al.  Analysis of Covariance Structures and Probabilistic Binary Choice Data , 1989 .

[43]  S. Grossberg.  Neural Networks and Natural Intelligence , 1988 .

[44]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[45]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of decision making under risk: affective balance and cognitive-emotional interactions. , 1988, Psychological review.

[46]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. , 1987 .

[47]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[48]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[50]  Richard R. Batsell,et al.  A New Class of Market Share Models , 1985 .

[51]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Experimental paradigms emphasising state or process limitations: I effects on speed-accuracy tradeoffs , 1985 .

[52]  B. Dosher.  Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  STOCHASTIC CHOICE HEURISTICS , 1984 .

[54]  R A Heath,et al.  Random-Walk and Accumulator Models of Psychophysical Discrimination: A Critical Evaluation , 1984, Perception.

[55]  Stochastische Theorien individuellen Wahlverhaltens , 1984 .

[56]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[57]  S. Grossberg.  Studies of mind and brain : neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control , 1982 .

[58]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[59]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[60]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[61]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[62]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  A set-theoretic random utility model of choice behavior , 1980 .

[63]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[64]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[65]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[66]  D. Vickers.  Decision processes in visual perception , 1979 .

[67]  J. Payne,et al.  Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research , 1978 .

[68]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[69]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Choice frequency and similarity , 1977 .

[70]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[71]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[72]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[73]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[74]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[75]  L. V. Jones,et al.  The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. , 1970 .

[76]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[77]  H. D. Miller,et al.  The Theory Of Stochastic Processes , 1977, The Mathematical Gazette.

[78]  R. Shepard.  Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[79]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[80]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[81]  L L THURSTONE,et al.  The measurement of values. , 1960, Psychological review.